- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/9/24 at 9:40 am to SDVTiger
He likes needling the shite out of lefties. 
Posted on 8/9/24 at 9:41 am to VOR
What are you referring too exactly Vor
Posted on 8/9/24 at 9:46 am to Flats
quote:
That's absurd. Of course they'll attack, they'll try, but some candidates give them more to work with than others.
Trump is polarizing and that drives turnout, both theirs and ours. The fewer of them that are motivated to get out and vote against someone the better.
Your post is true but Trump is beyond polarizing. He's segregated. He's separated. He's on an Island in some ways.
This board doesn't fully appreciate the loathsome hatred the opposition has for him. We've never seen anything like this. The hate for him is so visceral and potent that it drives oppositional turnout.
Even if liberals have a shitty candidate (like Biden or Harris) they'll turn out just to vote against Trump, and that's unusual. People typical sit out an election if they have a candidate they can't get excited about. Well not in Trump’s case, those motherfrickers will turn out in mass quantities just to vote against him.
The assassination attempt has turned this into a broken glass election for Conservatives and Republicans. We'll find out soon if there are actually enough of us to win a Presidential election. Just like in 2020, liberal turn out will be sky frickin' high and millions will turn out simply because they hate Trump.
Posted on 8/9/24 at 9:49 am to 50_Tiger
One word POLITICS
And if you notice all the dem voters that refused her in the primary have all fell in line and are touting her amazing qualifications ans how she's so likeable, etc.
And if you notice all the dem voters that refused her in the primary have all fell in line and are touting her amazing qualifications ans how she's so likeable, etc.
Posted on 8/9/24 at 10:21 am to 50_Tiger
Because she is who the democrats and the media (also the democrats) think they can drag across the finish line.
I imagine her numbers will be falsely reported as high through their conventions. Then when she debates Trump her wheels will come off just like they did with joe.
She will undoubtable have the questions beforehand but that wont change that she is an idiot and will probably start spouting off some word salad that nobody understands. Hopefully Trump can use some of the talking points that Tulsi used to gut her arse in that debate.
I imagine her numbers will be falsely reported as high through their conventions. Then when she debates Trump her wheels will come off just like they did with joe.
She will undoubtable have the questions beforehand but that wont change that she is an idiot and will probably start spouting off some word salad that nobody understands. Hopefully Trump can use some of the talking points that Tulsi used to gut her arse in that debate.
Posted on 8/9/24 at 10:23 am to TigerDat
quote:
And if you notice all the dem voters that refused her in the primary have all fell in line and are touting her amazing qualifications ans how she's so likeable, etc.
Its not as if the same wouldn't be true if the roles were reversed. It isn't surprising or even noteworthy that the parties coalesce around their candidate, given that our electoral system produces a binary choice for federal office.
Posted on 8/9/24 at 10:26 am to 50_Tiger
Pretty easy explanation.
She was the only candidate who could access the campaign's war chest and existing infrastructure.
Any other candidate would have had to start from scratch.
There was a lot of trepidation about her. Many folks would have preferred someone else, but they saw the immediate energy and fundraising and quickly fell in line.
It's as simple as that. No need to construct some wackadoodle conspiracy theory.
She was the only candidate who could access the campaign's war chest and existing infrastructure.
Any other candidate would have had to start from scratch.
There was a lot of trepidation about her. Many folks would have preferred someone else, but they saw the immediate energy and fundraising and quickly fell in line.
It's as simple as that. No need to construct some wackadoodle conspiracy theory.
Posted on 8/9/24 at 10:29 am to 50_Tiger
The real question is how did she suddenly become popular after being historically unpopular until the second she announced her candidacy. Check out her huge surge in favorability. It’s all manipulated.
Posted on 8/9/24 at 11:36 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
It was loosened a little when Biden told him to frick off in his endorsement of Harris. Obama wanted to control that and Biden denied him.
That is good news.
Posted on 8/9/24 at 3:39 pm to Flats
quote:
That's absurd. Of course they'll attack, they'll try, but some candidates give them more to work with than others.
Remember what they did to Mitt fricking Romney?
frick out of here dude. It's not absurd at all. It's factual.
Posted on 8/9/24 at 3:50 pm to Strannix
I suspect 120 mil votes bc they really have to make up a lot of fake ballots just in case they actually come close. 
Popular
Back to top

0









