- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can Barr arrest Nadler...
Posted on 5/6/19 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 5/6/19 at 10:03 pm
...for trying to coerce Barr to commit a crime by unredacting Grand Jury testimony?
Barr needs to send Nadler a letter indicating that he will prosecute Nadler for trying to force him to commit a crime.
Barr needs to send Nadler a letter indicating that he will prosecute Nadler for trying to force him to commit a crime.
This post was edited on 5/6/19 at 10:04 pm
11
Posted on 5/6/19 at 10:07 pm to djmicrobe
It’s a Democratic Party-wide conspiracy to compel him to commit a crime. Arrest them all.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 10:07 pm to Lsupimp
Or just ignore him...
Posted on 5/6/19 at 10:39 pm to John McClane
quote:Much rather see most of the Dem Party facing 20 years for Conspiracy to Commit
Or just ignore him...
Posted on 5/6/19 at 10:41 pm to djmicrobe
Need a big paddy wagon:
Posted on 5/6/19 at 10:52 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
...for trying to coerce Barr to commit a crime by unredacting Grand Jury testimony?
Barr needs to send Nadler a letter indicating that he will prosecute Nadler for trying to force him to commit a crime.
Solicit is the word I believe. I dont see why not.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 10:53 pm to djmicrobe
Backer is too fat to be arrested
Posted on 5/6/19 at 11:31 pm to djmicrobe
quote:It’s interesting though that when the DOJ was resisting Nunes’ fight for the release of information regarding an on-going investigation, many were calling for those in the DOJ to be arrested, despite the DOJ also raising valid legal and practical concerns.
for trying to coerce Barr to commit a crime by unredacting Grand Jury testimony?
Frankly, I think both are examples of hack politicians just being the partisan hacks that so many love when they are hacking it up on their side.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 11:38 pm to buckeye_vol
No, they are scum trying to keep thereselves out of jail and keep the money flowing in. SCUM of the earth.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 11:42 pm to omegaman66
quote:OK. And I’m sure someone is arguing the same thing about Barr, and I’m sure both arguments align perfectly (and conveniently) with one’s partisan views. Isn’t it possible that both are scum or that neither are scum?
No, they are scum trying to keep thereselves out of jail and keep the money flowing in. SCUM of the earth.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 11:55 pm to djmicrobe
Charge him with abuse of power...using his public office to harass for political means, or just for being a dumbazz liberal.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:23 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
It’s interesting though that when the DOJ was resisting Nunes’ fight for the release of information regarding an on-going investigation, many were calling for those in the DOJ to be arrested, despite the DOJ also raising valid legal and practical concerns.
Nunes was asking for info unrelated to a Grand Jury investigation. DOJ could have permitted the underrated info to be viewed in a secure place, just like Barr.
Nadler is asking Barr to commit a crime. Nunez requested info which could be legally permitted to view.
Also, the DOJ was redacting info to cover up their own actions which looked questionable. They were covering up the truth.
Barr is covering up nothing.
These 2 situations are very different, if you have educated yourself to the facts.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:38 am to buckeye_vol
quote:Perhaps you can cite that?
It’s interesting though that when the DOJ was resisting Nunes’ fight for the release of information regarding an on-going investigation, many were calling for those in the DOJ to be arrested
I remember similar conversations re: Issa and Holder. Of course Holder subsequently became the first U.S. Attorney General in history to be held in both criminal and civil contempt. He was held, by a bipartisan 255–67 vote, in contempt by the House of Representatives. At that point, he probably should have been arrested.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:03 am to PorkSammich
If Nadler's tailor charges by the yard he'll be a millionaire in no time.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:04 am to djmicrobe
quote:That’s exactly what they did, and Nunes didn’t even go. He sent (probably a good idea) Gowdy instead.
DOJ could have permitted the underrated info to be viewed in a secure place, just like Barr.
But they are accusing Barr of not allowing THEM access whatsoever:
quote:So what is specific crime is Nadler asking Barr to commit by requesting that the committee view the unredacted report?
"[T]he Committee needs to review the unredacted report, the underlying evidence, and associated documents so that it can ascertain the facts and consider our next steps," the report reads.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:09 am to buckeye_vol
quote:Unauthorized release of 6e Material. Segments of Congress have access to everything else in the report.
So what is specific crime is Nadler asking Barr to commit
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:13 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
So what is specific crime is Nadler asking Barr to commit
Unauthorized release of 6e Material. Segments of Congress have access to everything else in the report.
Demanding illegal activity under threat of contempt to boot.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:16 am to djmicrobe
Barr is the most powerful lawman in the country. He can arrest anyone he pleases.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:34 am to NC_Tigah
quote:While there seems to be some conflicts in circuit courts, at least 2 decisions have ruled that Congress as the authority to review it:
Unauthorized release of 6e Material.
quote:
Relying on an expansive conception of Congress’ investigative authority, two courts have held that Congress has a “constitutionally independent legal right” to obtain documents in furtherance of “legitimate legislative activity” even if the documents disclose matters occurring before a grand jury. Yet other courts have criticized these decisions, sharply disagreeing with the conclusion that the rule of grand jury secrecy does not apply when Congress is the contemplated recipient of information.
It’s one thing to argue that Barr as the right to refuse their demands, it’s another thing to argue that the demands are inherently legal when multiple courts have said otherwise.
The Special Counsel’s Report: Can Congress Get It?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 4:50 am to buckeye_vol
quote:No sir!
While there seems to be some conflicts in circuit courts, at least 2 decisions have ruled that Congress as the authority to review it:
Congress has the right to ask the Courts for authorized release of 6e material.
In this instance they have not done that.
Nadler's current request is for Barr's unauthorized release of 6e Material. That would constitute a crime. The Judicial Branch has complete say over whether release of such material can or will be authorized.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News