- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California Governor signs law that allows college athletes to get paid
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:50 pm to Jbird
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:50 pm to Jbird
quote:
Jbird
You have no idea how clueless you are about Title IX. You're making a fool of yourself
Of course, you could cite the Title IX law that prohibits Tua from doing a commercial for Dreamland...if it existed.
1
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:50 pm to NPComb
quote:
USC and UCLA about to have every 5* athlete west of the Mississippi.
And none of them can compete for titles or play in college sanctioned games.
Which means TV money is GONE. NCAA controls that money.
I'd say they are in for a budgeting nightmare IF they allow one penny to the athlete.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:51 pm to BamaGradinTn
I am glad YOU STOPPEED frickING YELLING!
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:52 pm to USA Dan
quote:
Wearing the team's jersey? I'd imagine without the jersey they wouldn't get much.
And if there's no name on the jersey, what would they be entitled to?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:53 pm to Music_City_Tiger
Y'all have WAAAY too much faith in the NCAA. They are too busy fighting for bathroom equality to care about California.
Watch and see them fold...
Watch and see them fold...
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:53 pm to Jbird
quote:
I am glad YOU STOPPEED frickING YELLING!
And I'll be glad when you actually learn what the frick Title IX is.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:54 pm to BamaGradinTn
Well educate me Gump.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:59 pm to Music_City_Tiger
Nobody ever said democrats aren't shortsighted.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:08 pm to Vecchio Cane
quote:
I still don't see the need for any law.
It was never illegal for them to be paid.
That's not the only nature of the bill.
CBS makes millions for every SEC Game of the Week. The entire week leading up to it they use highlights of players to help increase viewership. That is a prime example of someone using the players' likeness. No different than CBS having to pay BMI for every music clip they use.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:12 pm to BamaGradinTn
Got a question for you, do you think time slots and stations covering sports impact the potential earning power of a student athlete?
Well since you are the expert I guess I needed to find the answer myself.
So how long beofre a lawsuit is brought concerning your football team getting major coverage and preferred time slots for the games?
Soon as someone starts making money Gump.
Well since you are the expert I guess I needed to find the answer myself.
So how long beofre a lawsuit is brought concerning your football team getting major coverage and preferred time slots for the games?
Soon as someone starts making money Gump.
quote:LINK
Similarly, in 2012 the Seventh Circuit required an Indiana high school to schedule more girls' basketball games on Fridays and Saturdays. It argued that relegating girls' games to "non-primetime" results "in a loss of audience" and "foster[s] feelings of inferiority" that depress girls' interest in basketball: "[D]isparate scheduling creates a cyclical effect that stifles community support, prevents the development of a fan base, and discourages females from participating in a traditionally male dominated sport." Title IX requires schools to counteract these "stereotyped notions of women's interests and abilities" by increasing the audience for girls' varsity games.
This post was edited on 9/30/19 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:13 pm to roadGator
quote:
Until the NCAA allows it this is meaningless.
Not true.
NCAA is a paper tiger. They really can't enforce shite. The members have to consent to their bullshite. Corporations and bowl games don't have to consent to what the NCAA says.
NCAA is all mouth and no trousers.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:20 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Not true.
NCAA is a paper tiger. They really can't enforce shite. The members have to consent to their bullshite. Corporations and bowl games don't have to consent to what the NCAA says.
NCAA is all mouth and no trousers.
absolutely this. No one tunes in on Saturday morning thinking "I can't wait to watch an NCAA sanctioned football game."
They want to watch the teams play. Free market will eventually sort this all out one way or the other.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:21 pm to pankReb
quote:
Free market will eventually sort this all out one way or the other.
Until men make more money then women athletes.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:29 pm to Jbird
They'll also have the opportunity to be compensated for their likeness.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:30 pm to Music_City_Tiger
While California is busy with seceding from the NCAA, can they go ahead and secede from everything else while they're at it?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:31 pm to pankReb
quote:That's nice, now how about your Reb football team playing on prime time and the Reb women's La crosse on ESPN 47 at 11 p.m. on a Sunday night, that impact potential earning power of the oppressed female athlete?
They'll also have the opportunity to be compensated for their likeness.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:33 pm to Jbird
What about it?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:33 pm to pankReb
quote:Precedent as already been set brah.
What about it?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:34 pm to Jbird
Has it?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:35 pm to pankReb
It has.
quote:Very easy to apply this to potential earning power.
Similarly, in 2012 the Seventh Circuit required an Indiana high school to schedule more girls' basketball games on Fridays and Saturdays. It argued that relegating girls' games to "non-primetime" results "in a loss of audience" and "foster[s] feelings of inferiority" that depress girls' interest in basketball: "[D]isparate scheduling creates a cyclical effect that stifles community support, prevents the development of a fan base, and discourages females from participating in a traditionally male dominated sport." Title IX requires schools to counteract these "stereotyped notions of women's interests and abilities" by increasing the audience for girls' varsity games.
Page 5 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News