- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California Assault Weapons Ban coming back to chopping block.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:37 pm to BuckyCheese
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:37 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
That has happened a number of times.
That doesn't f*cking matter.
No Democrat thug has done it since the law was struck down and that will be all that matters in the demented and deranged mind of a Dimocrap.
This post was edited on 6/29/22 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:38 pm to Clames
quote:
Saint Benitez
Blessings be upon him.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:40 pm to captdalton
quote:
The Hearing Protection Act that would have treated suppressors the same as firearms (just a standard 4473 background check; no NFA $200 tax stamp and 6-12+ month wait) was poised to be approved and had already cleared the committee. . Then the Las Vegas shooting happened. And that bill died that night. Strange thing that Las Vegas shooting.
So to answer your question, probably never unless you want to go the tax stamp route.
Yeah the Hearing Protection Act would be nice.
There's also the Home Defense and Competitive Shooting Act that would remove SBRs and a couple others.
All great things, but I'd really like to see these issues litigated and decided by SCOTUS, rather than Congress.
Posted on 6/29/22 at 10:01 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
How long before some leftist flunky 'accidentally' releases the named and addresses of everyone who owns an AR or an AK?
Gonna be a long list
Posted on 6/29/22 at 10:08 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
I wonder if SCOTUS' decision from last week can be used to fight the attack on ammo. Or maybe the EPA one of it goes for the good guys?
It might, though the EPA ruling could be more impactful if Chevron deference is disposed of.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 5:54 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:a friend of mine owns one. Decommissioned from polish AF.
MiG 21?
Posted on 6/30/22 at 6:38 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
I think I should be able to legally own a fully operational tank.
Ummmmm bad news for you, YOU CAN!, and have never not been able to.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 6:40 am to Clames
You know what actually IS protected by very clear wording in the constitution?
Popular
Back to top


0







