- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Calcasieu River Bridge in Lake Charles, La (I-10)
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:01 am
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:01 am
How can people be allowed to drive on this bridge? If something were to happen wouldn't the state and/or federal government be held accountable and negligent for leaving it open to the public? See below from my work, warning us not to take this bridge.
The Calcasieu River Bridge on I-10 has been given a very low safety rating. We urge caution and recommend avoiding this route for any travel, please note that travel on any company business shall be restricted to an alternate route. In most cases, the Lake Charles bypass (I-210) is a viable alternative.
The National Bridge Inventory (NBI) has rated the Calcasieu river bridge a 6.6 out of 100. (That is six point six out of 100, not a typo.)
(FYI - The I-35 West Mississippi River bridge in Minneapolis had a rating of 50 when it collapsed in 2007.)
Opened in 1952 with a 50-year lifespan, the I-10 bridge was designed for 37,000 vehicle crossings per day. An average of 81,710 vehicles crossed the bridge daily in 2016. Please plan on using the I-210 bridge,
to the south of I-10 instead (it has a rating of 73.9).
The National Bridge Inventory Database
State:LA
Place Name: Lake Charles
County: Calcasieu
NBI Structure Number: 071004509127691
Route Sign Prefix: Interstate
Route Number: 10
Facility Carried: ' I0010
Feature Intersected: 'CALCASIEU RIVER RR ST
Location: 'I-10 OVER LA 378
Year Built: 1952
Status: Structurally Deficient
RecordType: Roadway is carried ON the structure
Level of Service: Mainline roadway
Owner: State Highway Agency
Highway Agency District: 07
Maintenance Responsibility: State Highway Agency
Functional Class: Principal Arterial - Interstate, Urban
Service On Bridge: Highway
Service Under Bridge: Highway-waterway-railroad
Latitude: 30 14 13.11 N
Longitude: 93 15 29.94 W
Material Design: Steel continuous
Design Construction: Truss - Thru
Approach Material Design: Steel
Approach Design Construction: Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder
Structure Length (m): 2,014.000
Navigation Vertical Clearance (m): 4.1
Approach Roadway Width (m): 28
Lanes on Structure: 4
Lanes under Structure: 8
Average Daily Traffic: 74100
Year of Average Daily Traffic: 2015
Design Load: MS 18
Scour: Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour and to reduce the risk of bridge failure during a flood event.
Bridge Railings: Do not meet currently acceptable standards.
Historical Significance: Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
# of Spans in Main Structure: 7
# of Spans in Approach Structures: 90
StructureFlared: No flare
Transitions: Does not meet currently acceptable standards.
Approach Guardrail: Does not meet currently acceptable standards.
Approach Guardrail Ends: Meets currently acceptable standards.
Navigation Control: Navigation control on waterway (bridge permit required).
Navigation Horizontal Clearance (m): 11.6
Structure Open?: Open, no restrictions
Deck: Serious Condition
Superstructure: Serious Condition
Substructure: Serious Condition
Structural Evaluation: Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrective action
Sufficiency Rating (%): 6.6
The Calcasieu River Bridge on I-10 has been given a very low safety rating. We urge caution and recommend avoiding this route for any travel, please note that travel on any company business shall be restricted to an alternate route. In most cases, the Lake Charles bypass (I-210) is a viable alternative.
The National Bridge Inventory (NBI) has rated the Calcasieu river bridge a 6.6 out of 100. (That is six point six out of 100, not a typo.)
(FYI - The I-35 West Mississippi River bridge in Minneapolis had a rating of 50 when it collapsed in 2007.)
Opened in 1952 with a 50-year lifespan, the I-10 bridge was designed for 37,000 vehicle crossings per day. An average of 81,710 vehicles crossed the bridge daily in 2016. Please plan on using the I-210 bridge,
to the south of I-10 instead (it has a rating of 73.9).
The National Bridge Inventory Database
State:LA
Place Name: Lake Charles
County: Calcasieu
NBI Structure Number: 071004509127691
Route Sign Prefix: Interstate
Route Number: 10
Facility Carried: ' I0010
Feature Intersected: 'CALCASIEU RIVER RR ST
Location: 'I-10 OVER LA 378
Year Built: 1952
Status: Structurally Deficient
RecordType: Roadway is carried ON the structure
Level of Service: Mainline roadway
Owner: State Highway Agency
Highway Agency District: 07
Maintenance Responsibility: State Highway Agency
Functional Class: Principal Arterial - Interstate, Urban
Service On Bridge: Highway
Service Under Bridge: Highway-waterway-railroad
Latitude: 30 14 13.11 N
Longitude: 93 15 29.94 W
Material Design: Steel continuous
Design Construction: Truss - Thru
Approach Material Design: Steel
Approach Design Construction: Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder
Structure Length (m): 2,014.000
Navigation Vertical Clearance (m): 4.1
Approach Roadway Width (m): 28
Lanes on Structure: 4
Lanes under Structure: 8
Average Daily Traffic: 74100
Year of Average Daily Traffic: 2015
Design Load: MS 18
Scour: Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour and to reduce the risk of bridge failure during a flood event.
Bridge Railings: Do not meet currently acceptable standards.
Historical Significance: Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
# of Spans in Main Structure: 7
# of Spans in Approach Structures: 90
StructureFlared: No flare
Transitions: Does not meet currently acceptable standards.
Approach Guardrail: Does not meet currently acceptable standards.
Approach Guardrail Ends: Meets currently acceptable standards.
Navigation Control: Navigation control on waterway (bridge permit required).
Navigation Horizontal Clearance (m): 11.6
Structure Open?: Open, no restrictions
Deck: Serious Condition
Superstructure: Serious Condition
Substructure: Serious Condition
Structural Evaluation: Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrective action
Sufficiency Rating (%): 6.6
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:04 am to bleedpg
what Facebook mom's group did you get this copypasta from?
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:05 am to SlowFlowPro
My work sent this out to us warning us not to take this route.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:06 am to bleedpg
what Facebook mom's group did that employee get this copypasta from?
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:06 am to bleedpg
quote:
The National Bridge Inventory (NBI) has rated the Calcasieu river bridge a 6.6 out of 100. (That is six point six out of 100, not a typo.)
The bridge in Minnesota that failed was rated a 26. Yeah, avoid that bridge.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
what Facebook mom's group did that employee get this copypasta from?
It really is rated a 6.6 and is one of the most dangerous bridges in America. I'll never cross it again.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:07 am to SlowFlowPro
So is this a new development or is this very old news? I don't know what to believe. I travel that route alot and my family does also.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
what Facebook mom's group did that employee get this copypasta from?
No idea. This came from my safety department and we are not allowed to drive this route while on company business.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:09 am to BugAC
that bridge is evaluated pretty regularly by the feds. it literally just had a ton of work done last year to handle the overflow due to the 210 work that's going on now. that safety rating is based on the narrow lanes and angle of ascent, not the risk of the bridge falling
This hoax has been going on for over a decade
This hoax has been going on for over a decade
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:09 am to bleedpg
quote:
So is this a new development or is this very old news? I don't know what to believe. I travel that route alot and my family does also.
Old news, really. But i think the rating is just becoming more known now. It should have been replaced 10 years ago. FWIW, there are plans to build a new bridge, but there is no funding for it. So you'll get the new bridge once the old one collapses.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:10 am to bleedpg
quote:
So is this a new development or is this very old news?
i believe this hoax started before Saban was coaching at Alabama, for a reference point
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:12 am to SlowFlowPro
Thanks,
I sent that link to my safety department. You may have something here.
I sent that link to my safety department. You may have something here.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
what Facebook mom's group did you get this copypasta from?
LOL
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:13 am to SlowFlowPro
If i run into my fried from high schools dad i will ask him. he was a structural engineer who inspected bridges for the state before retiring.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:14 am to EmmitDrallid
i'll say this. the risk of an issue with the bridge is significantly higher than the risks associated with MoMo
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:17 am to SlowFlowPro
No money the Republicans are so cheap they would rather put it on a wall than the safety of our on people. No infrastructure for the federal government.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:17 am to bleedpg
Pics of bridge?
Nevermind. Would not hit.
quote:
6.6 out of 100. (That is six point six out of 100, not a typo.)
Nevermind. Would not hit.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:17 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:17 am to CAD703X
quote:clearly several someone's did hit it though
Would not hit.
Popular
Back to top

11





