- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brown just deleted the profile page of one of its students…
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:24 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:24 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
It seems unlikely to me, however, that a kid who uses "they/them" pronouns is an Islamic jihadist.
Time will tell.
It seemed unlikely to me that I would live to see a group called Queers for Palestine, but...
Time will tell.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:26 pm to RollTide1987
Democrats are the party of violence
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:26 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
If it is White, female Christians, the shooter's success rate was pretty low.
Right, but if it was White female young republican it would've the tits right? Clown
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:29 pm to sabanisarustedspoke
quote:Are you suggesting that the Uzbek kid who was killed is a Republican as well?
If it is White, female Christians, the shooter's success rate was pretty low.quote:
Right, but if it was White female young republican it would've the tits right?
If so, we may have found a commonality.
But I rather doubt that an Uzbek foreign student was a member of the College Young Republicans.
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:29 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
One is female, the other is male.
One is European, the other is Central Asian
One is Christian, the other (from his name and home country) is probably Muslim
One had way more bullet holes than the other correct?
You just ignore the targetted part of my point?
ETA: havent kept up with the hour to hours details of this so if im wrong about that...inform me...
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:34 pm to gaetti15
quote:I have not seen any reporting on which victim attracted the most bullets.quote:One had way more bullet holes than the other correct?
One is female, the other is male.
One is European, the other is Central Asian
One is Christian, the other (from his name and home country) is probably Muslim
ETA: havent kept up with the hour to hours details of this so if im wrong about that...inform me...
You? If so, please link.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:38 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
You? If so, please link.
Not to BS you but I did see that reported in the initial onslaught of reports.
However upon further search I cant find anything at the moment, but with the amount of scrubbing going on idk if I trust a simple Google search anymore.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:39 pm to gaetti15
In all seriousness, this was a group of students gathered in a classroom to study for a final.
Was this the ONLY group studying in that building? If so, the argument that SOMEONE in that group was a specific target gains SOME traction.
Or was every classroom on that floor full of students studying for DIFFERENT finals? If so, the "targeting" theory loses a lot of traction.
I don't think that much info of this sort has even been released as of yet. But the usual suspects are happily speculating, based entirely upon their preconceptions.
Was this the ONLY group studying in that building? If so, the argument that SOMEONE in that group was a specific target gains SOME traction.
Or was every classroom on that floor full of students studying for DIFFERENT finals? If so, the "targeting" theory loses a lot of traction.
I don't think that much info of this sort has even been released as of yet. But the usual suspects are happily speculating, based entirely upon their preconceptions.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:41 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The closest guy is not he.
“He”? I don’t think I’ve ever seen that done correctly on tigerdroppings!
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:43 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
don't think that much info of this sort has even been released as of yet. But the usual suspects are happily speculating, based entirely upon their preconceptions.
Yeah that i understand.
However, I wouldn't just make this up (some folks on this website do unfortunately). So apologies for the confusion
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:45 pm to Penrod
quote:Proper grammar is indeed a rarity in this locale.quote:“He”? I don’t think I’ve ever seen that done correctly on tigerdroppings!
The closest guy is not he.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:46 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:The indistinct blob inside the green circle at the far top edge of the video image.
Night, where is the shooter in that video? The closest guy is not he.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:15 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Are you suggesting that the Uzbek kid who was killed is a Republican as well?
Likely innocent bystander
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:21 pm to udtiger
Allan's snackbar striles again?
that a-hole allan sure has some shitty snacks in his vending machines. makes people rage.
that a-hole allan sure has some shitty snacks in his vending machines. makes people rage.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:28 pm to BHTiger
quote:
27 year old tranny Muslim 1st year student taking a BS degree......100% bet the taxpayer paid for it.
A. He’s 20.
B. ‘27 is his grad class.
C. The use of “they/their” in the article may be Brown’s attempt to be progressive.
D. Definitely a muzzie and maybe confused sexually.
E. US taxpayer funded through a NGO cutout that is actually a CIA front.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:28 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
But the usual suspects are happily speculating, based entirely upon their preconceptions.
Of course if the speculators turn out to be correct...
Will you admit such?
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:33 pm to CC
quote:
D. Definitely a muzzie and maybe confused sexually.
He wears lip gloss and lady earrings... I'd say he's confused.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:36 pm to Narax
quote:Sure. It would be silly to do otherwise.
if the speculators turn out to be correct... Will you admit such?
My point is NOT that it is inconceivable that the "speculators" are correct. My point is that there is not yet enough data to draw reasonable inferences and that what we have now is simply ... speculation.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:38 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
My point is that there is not yet enough data to draw reasonable inferences and that what we have now is simply ... speculation.
I think what stands out to me is that we know the name, they know the name, we know they know... and they've not cleared him. My reasonable inference is there's something there.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:40 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
speculation
It's interesting always interesting.
Plus there is the non stop rush to scrub profiles.
When that DEI chopper Pilot killed people on that plane, they held her name so they could scrub her social profile.
Any information gathered now might get scrubbed soon.
Popular
Back to top


0





