- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Comer announces they have found $200,000.00 DIRECT payment to Joe Biden
Posted on 10/21/23 at 8:31 am to SlimTigerSlap
Posted on 10/21/23 at 8:31 am to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Comer is hilarious.
Don't sell yourself short Slimdickslap
quote:
Posted by SlimTigerSlap ? on 10/19/23
Twitter is the devil. Amazing how many people will believe this stupid headline
quote:
WH apologizes for national security blunder after publishing Special Forces full photos
0
Posted on 10/21/23 at 8:36 am to BigBinBR
A Democrat will be elected as president in 2024.
The House will flip to the Democrats. Prepare yourselves, guys. It’s coming.
The House will flip to the Democrats. Prepare yourselves, guys. It’s coming.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 8:38 am to KiwiHead
quote:
If Biden were to produce loan papers or a promissory note, this is a standard loan repayment between brothers. Do better. The trail is out there, but this ain't it.
Lol Biden won’t talk to the press and you think he will volunteer cooperate
Posted on 10/21/23 at 8:49 am to ABearsFanNMS
But thus far there is not a linkage to any outward criminal activity by either James Biden or Joe Biden.
Someone wants to pay Jim Biden for access to his brother the former VP in 2018. The guy that paid 600 K to Jim Biden can do that and it's not illegal at that time. Jim Biden could write a check to Joe Biden in 2018 and put on the check, " for services rendered" and it would be OK. He was a private citizen at that point.
If I were going after Biden. I would want a transaction that happened prior to Jan.21 2017. 2018 transactions could be explained away. Plus this transaction occurred before Biden was an announced candidate.
I want a better trail. This is barely circumstantial. Although it is predicate to keep an investigation ongoing. It is far from a smoking gun though. More like bullets hanging around bookshelf but no discernable gun....or weapon for that matter.
It's a timing thing.
Someone wants to pay Jim Biden for access to his brother the former VP in 2018. The guy that paid 600 K to Jim Biden can do that and it's not illegal at that time. Jim Biden could write a check to Joe Biden in 2018 and put on the check, " for services rendered" and it would be OK. He was a private citizen at that point.
If I were going after Biden. I would want a transaction that happened prior to Jan.21 2017. 2018 transactions could be explained away. Plus this transaction occurred before Biden was an announced candidate.
I want a better trail. This is barely circumstantial. Although it is predicate to keep an investigation ongoing. It is far from a smoking gun though. More like bullets hanging around bookshelf but no discernable gun....or weapon for that matter.
It's a timing thing.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 8:53 am to Fun Bunch
"Loan repayment"
Posted on 10/21/23 at 8:56 am to momentoftruth87
He's not under any type of DOJ investigation, so he's not obliged to cooperate. Besides Joe Biden has very little exposure on this check. Jim Biden may have more, but he's under no obligation to produce documentation that would establish a bona fide contract between him and his brother.
If he were my client I would have him produce the promissory note and shut up this end of the investigation and make Comer look like an incompetent fool.
I'm not saying there was not influence peddling, I'm saying this is not evidence of what you seek.
If he were my client I would have him produce the promissory note and shut up this end of the investigation and make Comer look like an incompetent fool.
I'm not saying there was not influence peddling, I'm saying this is not evidence of what you seek.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 9:02 am to KiwiHead
You’re not a lawyer so stop acting like one. The check is irrelevant in the sense that it was a pay for play because of who Jim’s brother was. It’s a trend the check and story here verify that.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 9:11 am to VOR
quote:
A Democrat will be elected as president in 2024. The House will flip to the Democrats. Prepare yourselves, guys. It’s coming.
Probably. You're still an irredeemable moron.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 9:52 am to momentoftruth87
But I am a lawyer and what you contend would be dismissed . No DA or AG would seriously bring this as real evidence by itself or even in combination as evidence of anything larger as it applied to RICO. In the end it barely establishes a trend.
Go ahead , run this by a Republican DA or AG. He/she will tell you to get something more direct.Where or what is the specific crime? This transaction occurs in 2018. Joe Biden was a private citizen at that point. Get me something that shows payouts when Joe Biden was VP....shite get me something that shows he got money from his brother in 2008 that links up through influence peddling. Show me a real path or even one that is over grown with weeds. I could not take this in front of a judge. .
At best this could be predicate to keep open an investigation. But by itself this ain't much.
Go ahead , run this by a Republican DA or AG. He/she will tell you to get something more direct.Where or what is the specific crime? This transaction occurs in 2018. Joe Biden was a private citizen at that point. Get me something that shows payouts when Joe Biden was VP....shite get me something that shows he got money from his brother in 2008 that links up through influence peddling. Show me a real path or even one that is over grown with weeds. I could not take this in front of a judge. .
At best this could be predicate to keep open an investigation. But by itself this ain't much.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 10:07 am to KiwiHead
democrats are so corrupt
Posted on 10/21/23 at 10:15 am to tigersmanager
quote:
democrats are so corrupt
....and will defend each other to no end.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 10:16 am to KiwiHead
quote:
But I am a lawyer and what you contend would be dismissed
Posted on 10/21/23 at 10:23 am to momentoftruth87
Go ahead bring this to a Republican AG or judge.you would be laughed out of the office or chambers.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 10:28 am to KiwiHead
quote:
At best this could be predicate to keep open an investigation. But by itself this ain't much.
Disagree. When they fail to produce any evidence of a loan there is a case. If they do produce evidence of a loan and it wasn’t arms length there is a potential tax case. Everyone knows exactly what happened here. I wish there was video of Biden talking about quid pro quo (I mean other than the video of him saying just that with the Burisma prosecutor). Still, this check is not as unimportant as you claim.
This post was edited on 10/21/23 at 11:02 am
Posted on 10/21/23 at 10:30 am to VOR
quote:
A Democrat will be elected as president in 2024. The House will flip to the Democrats. Prepare yourselves, guys. It’s coming.
As long as you get to ballot harvest I think you’re right. Congrats.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 10:45 am to VOR
quote:
A Democrat will be elected as president in 2024.
The House will flip to the Democrats. Prepare yourselves, guys. It’s coming.
I'm fully aware.
I'm not poor or wealthy so this has no benefit to me.
California is your model for the rest of the country.
Posted on 10/21/23 at 11:00 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Someone wants to pay Jim Biden for access to his brother the former VP in 2018
You do realize the "big guy" was considering running prior to the date of this check. Here is an article from Politico in February 2018.
LINK Joe Biden Feb 2018
Posted on 10/21/23 at 11:13 am to BBONDS25
If Joe shows that he leant Jim 190K and there is a paper trail, then this falls apart. If he shows a transaction from his account(s) to his brother that is anywhere close to this number then it's not evidence of fraud.
Like I said, I would want more about than this. At best at this moment you have a possible underreporting of income. Do we have a copy of Joe's 2018 returns because if he reported this and paid taxes, this is nothing. If this was a no interest loan his tax exposure is minimal.
But you also know that if this is a private loan , a handshake deal, it's just as valid just harder to prove
The only way this is suspect is if Hunter lends the money and Joe gets repaid. But I'm not seeing anything outwardly illegal just given this one transaction and the timing. 2018 puts Biden as a private citizen. His family could trade on his name and previous influence....sleazy maybe.
The second a promissory note is produced this issue becomes less than an issue. In private matters a loan does not have to necessarily be arms length if both parties are going in eyes wide open.
For example: I leant my brother 50K as a bridge loan while he was moving his practice and was waiting on a loan to be finalized. No promissory note no interest. I gave him 50K and he paid me back 50K 3 months later. I reported it, but I did not pay any taxes because it was a wash.
I'm not saying it is not a little suspect, but I'm not going to a DA or AG with that as my anchor evidence in which everything else depends. The Burisma situation is imminently stronger....this not really
Like I said, I would want more about than this. At best at this moment you have a possible underreporting of income. Do we have a copy of Joe's 2018 returns because if he reported this and paid taxes, this is nothing. If this was a no interest loan his tax exposure is minimal.
But you also know that if this is a private loan , a handshake deal, it's just as valid just harder to prove
The only way this is suspect is if Hunter lends the money and Joe gets repaid. But I'm not seeing anything outwardly illegal just given this one transaction and the timing. 2018 puts Biden as a private citizen. His family could trade on his name and previous influence....sleazy maybe.
The second a promissory note is produced this issue becomes less than an issue. In private matters a loan does not have to necessarily be arms length if both parties are going in eyes wide open.
For example: I leant my brother 50K as a bridge loan while he was moving his practice and was waiting on a loan to be finalized. No promissory note no interest. I gave him 50K and he paid me back 50K 3 months later. I reported it, but I did not pay any taxes because it was a wash.
I'm not saying it is not a little suspect, but I'm not going to a DA or AG with that as my anchor evidence in which everything else depends. The Burisma situation is imminently stronger....this not really
Posted on 10/21/23 at 11:17 am to KiwiHead
2018 tax return is out there. Google is your friend.
LINK Joe Biden financial disclosures
Go to interest income Schedule B. Total of under 18k with the bulk of it coming from a k-1 Celticcapri Corp and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Association.
Let's not get started as well on his flow thru income either avoiding ss and Medicare. Again... not selling any product just himself.
LINK Joe Biden financial disclosures
Go to interest income Schedule B. Total of under 18k with the bulk of it coming from a k-1 Celticcapri Corp and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Association.
Let's not get started as well on his flow thru income either avoiding ss and Medicare. Again... not selling any product just himself.
This post was edited on 10/21/23 at 11:24 am
Posted on 10/21/23 at 11:20 am to KiwiHead
quote:
If Joe shows that he leant Jim 190K and there is a paper trail, then this falls apart. If he shows a transaction from his account(s) to his brother that is anywhere close to this number then it's not evidence of fraud.
Agreed. The only thing we can ascertain now is that the interest income was not reported on the 2018 income. So it indicates there wasn’t a loan or that if there was it wasn’t arms length.
quote:
The second a promissory note is produced this issue becomes less than an issue. In private matters a loan does not have to necessarily be arms length if both parties are going in eyes wide open.
quote:
The second a promissory note is produced this issue becomes less than an issue. In private matters a loan does not have to necessarily be arms length if both parties are going in eyes wide open.
Agreed. I said this yesterday. Also, bank documents to back up that the promissory note is legit.
The reality is, there won’t be evidence of a loan and this will be recognized as a bribe. If they produce the note and the corresponding bank records I will eat crow.
Page 11 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News