- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breakdown of the Epstein Files - G. Maxwell is Defendant - This is SICK!
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:15 pm to alpinetiger
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:15 pm to alpinetiger
4
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:18 pm to blackinthesaddle
finally, you got him. congrats.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:19 pm to blackinthesaddle
quote:
Because Trump and Epstein's falling out wasn't over girls, it was over a Florida property that both men were bidding on which drove up the price that Trump had to pay. The same property that Trump later sold to a Russian oligarch for a suspiciously large profit.
So that means that Trump was actually part of all this sick crap?
"Well, they fell out over something else, so OBVIOUSLY, Trump was a Pedo, too..."?
That's what you are going with?
Some of you folks are too stupid to live. Yet you do. How is it possible?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:22 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
The same property that Trump later sold to a Russian oligarch for a suspiciously large profit.
He was a real estate investor. What was he supposed to do, sell it at a loss? That would have been "suspicious ". Where are the journalistic standards anymore?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:25 pm to Beessnax
quote:
He was a real estate investor. What was he supposed to do, sell it at a loss? That would have been "suspicious ".
Was it "suspicious" at the time, or did it only become "suspicious" after Trump became President?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:25 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Page 102 (443) - Guiffre clarifies she never say Donald have sex with any of the ‘girls’ in her presence but had met him a few times. - Donald Trump was never in her presence with her with any of the ‘other girls’. - Her Dad seems to have known Donald trump and talked when they say each other and was there at least once when they met. Page 103 (444) - Giuffre had never been in Donald Trump presence while at the same time being in the presence of Epstein. - Jeffrey was the one who told Giuffre they were good friends, but she never observed them together. - She never saw him at Epstein’s island, New Mexico, or New York that she can remember.
The dems hoping to implicate Trump ain't gonna like this, any more than they like her testifying against their heroes.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:27 pm to SSpaniel
I would place my bet on only after becoming president. They just don't even try to hide their hatred for him.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:28 pm to OmniPundit
quote:
The dems hoping to implicate Trump ain't gonna like this, any more than they like her testifying against their heroes.
But... but... that's not what I was promised.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:32 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
So that means that Trump was actually part of all this sick crap?
You're jumping to a false conclusion. I'm not saying that at all. Trump is not pursuing this with altruistic intent, is what I'm saying. There's a larger war going on and some people are aligning themselves with a team, when none of them are on team American values. I'm all for exposing the mechanizations of those in power, let's just not get caught up in teams.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:34 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
But... but... that's not what I was promised.
We just have to remember that's the dem story. "Promises, Promises", even if they know there is no way that they could be kept.
My evidence: The debates; each candidate upping the ante on the free stuff they would give, trying to buy votes. (With our money, of course. Unfortunately, we just ain't got enough to pay for all their promises.)
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:39 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Was it "suspicious" at the time, or did it only become "suspicious" after Trump became President?
Oh, it was suspicious in that it looks a lot like money laundering. Just because the media doesn't hold the rich to the flame, doesn't mean they aren't fleecing us. Real estate and art are the easiest ways to launder money.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:42 pm to GEAUXmedic
The super elite and career politicians lead unbelievably bizarre and fricked up lies we will never know about. This shite probably just scratches the surface.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:44 pm to blackinthesaddle
quote:
Oh, it was suspicious in that it looks a lot like money laundering.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:45 pm to SSpaniel
Your sarcastic rejection of truth is noted.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:50 pm to blackinthesaddle
quote:
Your sarcastic rejection of truth is noted.
So Trump was laundering money, eh? For the Russians, right? That's how they helped him get elected, isn't it? Now, I'm not saying you are dumb, but
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:53 pm to OmniPundit
quote:
We just have to remember that's the dem story. "Promises, Promises", even if they know there is no way that they could be kept.
Perfect example. Biden’s promise to cure cancer if he gets elected.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:05 pm to bmy
quote:
Cause its sketchy
Mar-a-lago. They’re bringing in pedos. They’re bringing in rapists. I’m sure some of their members are good people.
You see how easy it is to vilify a whole group of people for a very tenuous reason?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:25 pm to GEAUXmedic
Saw on Fox News earlier that the DOJ is going to have trouble brining charges against the 4 coconspirators. (kellen, etc).
They stated that if JE followed the conditions of the agreement, the US agrees not to bring charges against any of them for charges related to sex crimes.
Im summarizing, but Fox said the immunity deal was written so vaguely that the DOJ is going to have trouble arguing against it.
They stated that if JE followed the conditions of the agreement, the US agrees not to bring charges against any of them for charges related to sex crimes.
Im summarizing, but Fox said the immunity deal was written so vaguely that the DOJ is going to have trouble arguing against it.
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:28 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
the US agrees not to bring charges against any of them for charges related to sex crimes.
That is mind boggling. Simply mind boggling. No charges for sex trafficking.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:33 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
That is mind boggling. Simply mind boggling. No charges for sex trafficking.
After reading the file summary - for JE to get a slap on the wrist, and for the other 5 to walk Scott free with immunity - whoever was in on making that deal for the US should be thrown in jail.
Equal justice my arse. This is a joke. They need to investigate those prosecutors. I’m betting it will come out that they were paid.
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 4:38 pm
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News