- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BOOM! Chaffetz " DOJ IG to investigate leaks"
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:18 pm to Mr. Hangover
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:18 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
n someone give me some cliffs as to what's going on? I really don't follow politics but this has caught my attention
Espionage.... Intelligence leaked. That has happened several times and now that Sessions is sworn in the House is requesting the IG to investigate the leaks.
It's simple to find because only a small number of people would have the clearance to warrantlessly wire tap Trump and his team!
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If it were damning, you'd already know
Would we? Intelligence gathering takes time before an official report is made.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:18 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
t looks bad when you care more about the source of the leaks than the content of the leaks, amirite?
Both are important.
Can you now please link the full content of the leaks?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:19 pm to When in Rome
quote:
Has it been reported who placed the call to whom? Just curious.
I think there were more than 1, but I don't know the answer as to who called who in which instance.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:19 pm to Jjdoc
This will blow up on the Democrats. It had to have come from the Acting Ag that Trump fired last week.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:19 pm to jeff5891
quote:
If it were damning, you'd already know
Would we?
Ask WaPo...they didnt publish the info they had.
Instead, they published their analysis of the information.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:19 pm to jeff5891
quote:
We know Flynn felt the need to lie about it. Reason to investigate imo
Already investigated and no charges....
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:20 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
It's simple to find because only a small number of people would have the clearance to warrantlessly wire tap Trump and his team!
dude
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:21 pm to CptBengal
quote:
like Obama in 2008 before being inaugurated?
So that justifies Trump to do the same?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:21 pm to jeff5891
quote:
Would we? Intelligence gathering takes time before an official report is made.
Are you insane? There would be people all over themselves to report this.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:21 pm to jeff5891
quote:
You know the IG isn't the AG, right?
But is a part of the DOJ. :)
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Lol@you thinking "this administration" is behind the attacks.
no I just dont think this administration would be diligent and truthful with any results of an investigation
Trump lies
His staff lies
and the people he has in place are all sycophants that wont do the right thing when it comes to this admin.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:23 pm to Jjdoc
And they are thinking that someone from hillary or obama's side did it?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:23 pm to LSUwag
quote:
This will blow up on the Democrats. It had to have come from the Acting Ag that Trump fired last week.
I would be surprised if it really came from Yates.
I think it's politically iffy for both sides. The GOP will look mildly stupid pursuing the leaks behind Flynn getting canned for some degree of misconduct (misconduct =/= criminality). The left will look stupid for overplaying a scandal hand, something the GOP knows well about over the last 8 years.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:23 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
no I just dont think this administration would be diligent and truthful with any results of an investigation
You don't need an investigation to leak shite to the media.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:24 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
There's a 90% chance this is what the conversation went like.
Russian Guy: Hey so Flynn, can we do anything about these sanctions?
Flynn: Yeah man we're obviously gonna look at things like that after the inauguration.
Butthurt Obama appointees and MSM: Flynn talked about Sanctions!!!!!!!!!
Pence to Flynn: You talk about sanction?
Flynn to Pence: No dude.
Butthurt Obama appointees and MSM: Flynn is a liar!!!!!!!!
So then I presume you would have no problem with an in-depth investigation to make sure?
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:25 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
quote:
It's simple to find because only a small number of people would have the clearance to warrantlessly wire tap Trump and his team!
dude
That's a fact and verified by a lot of people today including the architect of the NSA and AGs across the US.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:25 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
And they are thinking that someone from hillary or obama's side did it?
People are saying Obama's side, but that really could mean any careerist at DOJ with access who is sanctimonious about the threat Trump poses. I'm not convinced it has to be some Obama loyalist.
For example, the IC elements who are opposing Trump, in significant part, probably aren't Obama fans.
Posted on 2/15/17 at 10:26 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
And they are thinking that someone from hillary or obama's side did it?
Obama loyalists
Popular
Back to top



2



