- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bondi responds! Boasberg gonna cry!
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
You think you are a smart guy.
So tell me this.
Are there certain powers of the president outside judicial review?
There are certain core powers that judges can't get involved in. Or if should say if they get involved in they overstep their authority.
I mean what can happen when a president oversteps his limits?
What recourse could there be? I mean could congress go anything.
It would've been great if the constitution had some way to check the power of a run away president.
Is there such a mechanism?
1
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
why don't you go play Zelda TOTK to kill time? your trolling game is so far gone it is obvious.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
Your melts never get old
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:52 pm to thetempleowl
quote:
Are there certain powers of the president outside judicial review?
Sure.
quote:
I mean what can happen when a president oversteps his limits?
What recourse could there be? I mean could congress go anything.
It would've been great if the constitution had some way to check the power of a run away president.
Is there such a mechanism?
So you think that the only remedy for a President acting outside of his statutory authority is impeachment?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:52 pm to Paddyshack
quote:
Your melts never get old
You have a wonderful imagination. No melt here.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You have a wonderful imagination. No melt here.
You’re melting and you’re in denial. Not a good combination. Hope it works out for you
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:54 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
why don't you go play Zelda TOTK to kill time? your trolling game is so far gone it is obvious.
I'm not trolling. I'm trying to explain to the short-sighted types that this is a terrible standard for everyone moving forward.
Trolling would be the person above
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're not
You're losing
...and are subsequently upset
...and thus trolling
You're losing
...and are subsequently upset
...and thus trolling
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
short-sighted types that this is a terrible standard for everyone moving forward.
So do tell what you think will happen?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Instead of perpetually posting bullshite rhetoric, tell me why deporting gang members and criminals should not be allowed.
And for once, just stick to the question I asked.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
And who's watching the judge as he makes his decisions in a silo?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
you think that the only remedy for a President acting outside of his statutory authority is impeachment?
I reread what I wrote and I don't see me saying that.
However, let me make this clear.
When previous supreme court decisions have stated that certain decisions are made at the discretion of the president and the president alone, that says the judicial has no right to review it.
Obviously there are additional mechanisms to remove a president, but when the Supreme Court already said the ultimate arbiter is the president, that means that judicial review should not be done.
On that choice by the president.
Or do you disagree?
So during war if the president decides to move a certain deal team from point a to point b, a judge can block that?
Seems ridiculous.
So some of the president's decisions are not open to judicial oversight.
But they are open to other oversight. Can we at least agree in that?
Or are you doing a judge can block any decision by a president?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:00 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
and are subsequently upset
I"m not upset. This is par for the course, especially avoiding answering my questions.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:01 pm to NussBusDriver
quote:
When they failed to enforce our immigration laws and left the border wide open.
Bingo. The door swings both ways. By their own standards this judge was complicit allowing illegals into the country, not to mention his daughters financial stake in that illegal activity.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:01 pm to KCT
quote:
tell me why deporting gang members and criminals should not be allowed.
I never argued it shouldn't. I've stated the opposite ITT I believe
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're upset
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:02 pm to thetempleowl
quote:
I reread what I wrote and I don't see me saying that.
That's why i was asking you to be specific about your point and stop beating around the bush to allow you to remain malleable.
quote:
So during war if the president decides to move a certain deal team from point a to point b, a judge can block that?
No.
quote:
But they are open to other oversight. Can we at least agree in that?
Sure.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When?
Criticized judges during ongoing litigation? Lots of examples. Remember when the left said the Supreme Court was illegitimate? Now criticizing a District Court is worse than that?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:05 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Criticized judges during ongoing litigation?
No it was
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
He said that is what the Biden admin did.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. I will continue to argue for your rights and smaller government.
Saving democracy on a message board!
You’re a silly guy SFP.
Page 8 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News