Started By
Message

re: Bombing Iran never served U.S. interests

Posted on 4/9/26 at 3:34 pm to
Posted by holdmuh keystonelite
Member since Oct 2020
4582 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 3:34 pm to
It seems a lot of people haven’t accepted that we are likely down to two options with Iran:

-a long, costly ground war

or

-a peace deal with a lot of crappy stuff in it
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90352 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 3:35 pm to
Only two options!

Boolean boi!
Posted by LightHeat
Member since Oct 2020
558 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

So, a country that promises to destroy America and is developing a nuke to do it, should be ignored? OK.


The risk from Iran (against the U.S. directly) is principally from terror operations, and the worst-case scenario is that they develop and sell a nuclear weapon that someone else floats into one of our coastal cities, with plausible deniability for Iran.

It is not clear to me whether that risk is now higher or lower.
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
6971 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

You really need to brush up on your history the last 47 years. Iran has been the world's largest state sponsor of terror.


Yeah? Some suspect Saudi is up there with them. Should we go bomb them back to the stone age, too? North Korea... them too? China?

Sorry, that doesn't compare to Germany and Japan. Brush up on your own and try again.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65599 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Bombing Iran never served U.S. interests


Stopped reading. Entire premise is false.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram