Started By
Message

re: Bill Gates funding Toxic Chemicals in milk cows to reduce climate changing flatulence

Posted on 11/28/24 at 10:25 pm to
Posted by Shamoan
Member since Feb 2019
13303 posts
Posted on 11/28/24 at 10:25 pm to
Nerd that needs a fair and swift trial that ends with him hanging from a rope.
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
31039 posts
Posted on 11/28/24 at 10:29 pm to
Only glass bottle Brits/no BPA..yet let Gates chemical the cows..penny wise..pound foolish

London and Britain are finished
Posted by Von
Wichita Falls, TX
Member since Feb 2019
2662 posts
Posted on 11/28/24 at 11:24 pm to
Scientists and journalists are easier to buy than politicians, and Gates owns a shitload of all of them.

It blows my mind that that creepy a-hole keeps proposing (and executing) crazy arse plans that have a definite impact on millions of people, without their consent, and he gets zero pushback from any government agencies, law enforcement, concerned scientists, curious journalists...

Something you can always be sure of with this fricker. A lot of people will be harmed and he will make billions of dollars on the other end.
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
18001 posts
Posted on 11/28/24 at 11:32 pm to
I think I missed the part where it’s shown as toxic to humans
Posted by PalletJack
LA by birth, TX by choice
Member since Oct 2024
946 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 3:19 am to
quote:

I think I missed the part where it’s shown as toxic to humans


We give milk to children, I would guess our personal intake drops sharply as we age.
We allow an evil billionaire to begin introducing chemicals to cows for bullshite reasons.
If they change the cow they can change the milk thereby changing those who consume it.
On the other hand, if at an early age the brain of children is manipulated they become controllable.
Hmmmm, sure let's turn this frick loose.

Bill Gates no longer being alive would be a good thing for this world.
Posted by mtopdawg421
Middle GA
Member since Aug 2017
1249 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 7:38 am to
Gates has a very very hot location spot waiting for him when he leaves this world. The only windows he’s going to looking through is up.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 7:47 am to
quote:

I think I missed the part where it’s shown as toxic to humans

Yeah, from what I can tell, the reports are not highlighting potential harm to humans - that doesn't mean it's absent, but leave that aside for now. The reports do suggest a signal of harm to the animals is present. That could be a real problem if we start reducing the number of dairy cows by killing them with this chemical. That will affect the availability of both dairy and meat.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
18381 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 7:49 am to
When you mention Hussein in your list, are you using a middle name?
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22843 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Cows, and other livestock, have zero impact on climate change. Not even a measurable amount.


It only took dinosaurs 200M years to fart themselves out of existence.
Posted by LaMigra
Member since Nov 2022
2716 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 8:06 am to
quote:

He could set a great example by taking his own life


Exactly, why doesn’t he set the example and do us all a favor and offs himself already!!
Posted by Audustxx
Member since Jul 2022
2283 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 8:23 am to
News flash; they all do
Posted by mikeytig
NE of Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2007
7754 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 8:29 am to
Axis of American Evil

Bill Gates
Joe Biden
Chris Wray
Merrick Garland
Any Biden/Obama appointed judge
Nancy Pelosi
Chuck Schumer
MSM
Adam Schiff


Feel free to add to the list.

Posted by FreedomBarefoot
42° parallel
Member since Aug 2016
2497 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 8:32 am to
quote:

We give milk to children, I would guess our personal intake drops sharply as we age.
We allow an evil billionaire to begin introducing chemicals to cows for bullshite reasons.
If they change the cow they can change the milk thereby changing those who consume it.


I noticed on my milk label that the company wasn't using cows treated with rBST. Some of the others brands used them.

I looked it up and it's basically a synthetic hormone that causes cows to produce more milk. Other countries have banned it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_somatotropin

quote:

Bovine somatotropin or bovine somatotrophin (abbreviated bST and BST), or bovine growth hormone (BGH), is a peptide hormone produced by cows' pituitary glands.[1] Like other hormones, it is produced in small quantities and is used in regulating metabolic processes.[1] Scientists created a bacterium that produces the hormone somatotropin which is produced by the cow's body after giving birth[2][page needed] and increases milk production by around 10 percent.

Recombinant bovine somatotropin (usually "rBST"), is a synthetic version of the bovine growth hormone given to dairy cattle by injection to increase milk production.

Controversy over its safety has led to it being banned in several countries, including the European Union since 1990, and Canada, Japan, Pakistan, Australia, New Zealand, and Argentina, as it has been found to increase health risks in cows. The Codex Alimentarius has not approved it as safe.

The FDA approved it in 1993, and required that any milk advertising that its cows were not treated with rBST include the disclaimer "The FDA has determined that no significant difference has been shown between milk derived from rBST treated and non-rBST treated cows".
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
7607 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 8:34 am to
Putting Covid into cows milk now. Fook these guys…switching to almond milk never surrender
Posted by idsrdum
Member since Jan 2017
604 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 8:38 am to
According to ChatGPT:
quote:

While 3-NOP is used in animal feed, there is a possibility of trace amounts in meat, milk, or eggs if the compound accumulates in animal tissues or products. The safety of such residues for human consumption has not been completely evaluated.

And yet:
quote:

the FDA has stated that 3-NOP is both safe and effective for use in livestock feed, specifically for reducing methane emissions in ruminant animals like cattle.

FDA authorized it for use in 2022.

Just another example that SAFE AND EFFECTIVE doesn't mean what we think it should.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram