re: Biden tapping Bill Nye the 'not really a' science guy

quote:

---

You have big tits? Congrats. Tuck them under your belt when you go into Walmart. No one wants to see those.

---

Why are you girlfriends telling you size don't matter in reference to your tits?

I have to admit, I did not see that one coming.

quote:

---

The nuclear timescale is of the Sun 10^10 years, The Kelvin Helmholtz timescale is around 3*10^7 years

---

quote:

---

So you just assume it must be the Sun?

---

No. But I do find cowfarts, Milankovitch cycles, CO2 climate causation, currents, and/or continental drift falling short of explaining this:

quote:

---

A few hundred thousand? But the shortest cycle is 20k and the longest 100k. What do you mean by "flutter"?

---

I said them both because the Milankovitch cycles are so negligible as to be a candidate for being a nothing burger over many of its cycles.

The likelihood of your nonsense being even CONSIDERABLE has to be made over a long term over many cycles. Still unlikely as it ever was.

and the conditions on the star itself continues to be the source of variations worthy of being called climate change...

Your ever gone out in the morning and felt the radiation from the star and noticed that it is warm?

Well here's your clue; it is warm because in this neighborhood it controls the radiation situation so far beyond anything else, it is practically all of it forever and ever..

even if massive underwater volcanos or dust veil volcanos have their way.

The star rules. NOT communists. Not Saturday morning tv personalities.

Stop being stupid.

quote:

---

Milankovitch cycles are so negligible

---

quote:

---

The star rules

---

??? The star rules, but it doesn't matter what path the Earth takes around the star or what it's attitude is relative to the star?

Ok. That don't make sense.

quote:

---

and the conditions on the star itself continues to be the source of variations worthy of being called climate change...

---

Okeey dokey like what does that even mean?

quote:

---

Your ever gone out in the morning and felt the radiation from the star and noticed that it is warm?

---

You ever notice when then Suns overhead it's a lot hotter than when it's in the other side of the Earth ?



Are you gonna actually explain anything or are you just throwing out speculation that hey, maybe the Suns it, even though there is no physical basis on which significant 100000 year oscillations in the Suns brightness can be based? Stars don't just change brightness for no reason. You get that right ?

quote:

---

maybe the Suns it

---

not maybe

quote:

---

Stars don't just change brightness for no reason

---

they change all the time. Our star has approx 11 year, 25 year, and a 300 year cycles of radiation.

The sun puffs its fusion 'bubbles', its sunspots over those lengths of time. It very much changes. good thing it is 93 million miles away during its variations

of course life here has faced this very thing since there was life here.. sola puffing away

Pay attention. You communists don't control a GD thing about this and couldn't even if you know what changes were beneficial or not,

which you don't

and you certainly don't get this target information from a saturday morning kids show (or the WEF or democrat/communists),

which you won't.

orbit jumping, OF COURSE

quote:

---

Depends on who you wanna believe.

---

2 points

1. It's a simple answer- No, smoking does not cause cancer

2. As for carbon dioxide, there is a finite amount of carbon and , therefore. There can only be a finite amount of carbon dioxide. The ratios may change but it will never be larger than the available carbon.