Started By
Message

re: Bernie Sanders says that "health care is a basic human right"

Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

It's a good argument.


I just pointed out that's it's not?

You have rights in this country that require other people's labor. That is a fact.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Maybe you missed why I brought it up, but the claim was that your right cannot be to someone else's labor. I was pointing out that it's a terrible argument, as I'm sure you'd agree.
Actually, it's a great and on point argument and your point doesn't counter it.

Unless, of course, you think that when people say they have a "right" to health care, they mean the same comparable level difference as what one might get from a public defender versus what Bill Gates might get when he goes to Johns Hopkins.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

I just pointed out that's it's not?
Not really.

We can't hold your hand out of your simple mindedness. You'll have to do that for yourself.

Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Actually, it's a great and on point argument and your point doesn't counter it.


So there is no labor involved in a trial?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

So there is no labor involved in a trial?
Yep

Alas, this goes to the point I keep making regarding what we are arguing one has RIGHT to.

Because, applying your point, everyone ALREADY has a "right" to free health care.

Homeless and go to the ER with a broken leg. They're gonna cast you up. frick up with the courts and can't afford a lawyer? We'll basically do the same.

Oh, but you want a GOOD lawyer(or a doctor with a given specialty)? Yeah. That's gonna cost you. And nope, you don't have a RIGHT to either.


Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

So there is no labor involved in a trial?

I should add that the court can't just go grab ANY attorney to do the job.

Those that are doing the job are people who have CHOSEN to be available to do it. (in other words, they took the job)

And, if you don't like the job that PD is doing...……..oh well.
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

So there is no labor involved in a trial?
Yep


Are you answering affirmatively to my question?

quote:

Because, applying your point, everyone ALREADY has a "right" to free health care.

Homeless and go to the ER with a broken leg. They're gonna cast you up. frick up with the courts and can't afford a lawyer? We'll basically do the same.



Those are not the same thing. Just saying "basically" does not mean that the two situation are the same in this context.

Who pays the public defender? Who pays the Dr for their labor in your scenario?

Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Those that are doing the job are people who have CHOSEN to be available to do it. (in other words, they took the job)


Do you think the plan is to cage Drs up and force them under penalty of torture to do their work?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Do you think the plan is to cage Drs up and force them under penalty of torture to do their work?

Do you think that they're going to let like 99% of all doctors opt out?


Nice try dude. Not very good, but, you had to try.

No one arguing for the "right" to health care is arguing for a right to only a few barely qualified doctors in any given community willing to help out. Sheesh.

As pointed out. We ALREADY have a comparable "right to health care" as we have for public defenders. This thread wouldn't exist and you wouldn't be in here full of shite if that was what you wanted.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Those are not the same thing. Just saying "basically" does not mean that the two situation are the same in this context. Who pays the public defender? Who pays the Dr for their labor in your scenario?


They're pretty much exactly the same thing. You get minimal care, or minimal legal services on the govt's dime from people who have CHOSEN a line of work that requires it.

Go back to bed. Your line of attack has failed.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
12182 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Do you think that they're going to let like 99% of all doctors opt out?


Opt out of what exactly?
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

No one arguing for the "right" to health care is arguing for a right to only a few barely qualified doctors in any given community willing to help out. Sheesh.


I'm not even arguing for the right to have healthcare. You're not even paying attention.

I'm arguing the assertion that you cannot have a right to other people's labor. We all do, and you've pointed out how. We have the RIGHT to have a qualified lawyer on our behalf, as well tons of other labor that is required to ensure a fair trial.

That's all.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Opt out of what exactly?
REad the thread man. It ain't complicated.

He's comparing the "right" to a public defender to the "right" to health care.

I pointed out that you ALREADY have that level of "right" in terms of health care. People don't just want that level.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
12182 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

They're pretty much exactly the same thing. You get minimal care, or minimal legal services on the govt's dime from people who have CHOSEN a line of work that requires it.


Yes, but minimum/necessary in both contexts do not necessarily equate to “cheaper” or “lesser quality.”

The similarity is that we (tax payers) foot the bill. People can bitch and moan about it, but I’ve yet to hear an ideal solution to this complex problem.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82317 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

We all do, and you've pointed out how.


Close, but not quite.

That lawyer still must consent and cooperate.

True rights do not rely on the consent and cooperation of others.

Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
12182 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

REad the thread man. It ain't complicated.

He's comparing the "right" to a public defender to the "right" to health care.

I pointed out that you ALREADY have that level of "right" in terms of health care. People don't just want th


I understand fully. The question, like I’ve stated multiple times, isn’t an ideological binary, but a matter of degree. As you noted, everyone has a “right” to emergency medical services to save their life. I’d venture and say most people do not agree people have a right to a boob job. So between these two scenarios, where is the inflection point?
Posted by LSURN98
Jupiter
Member since Oct 2019
448 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Yes, but minimum/necessary in both contexts do not necessarily equate to “cheaper” or “lesser quality.”


You serious, Clark?

Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6622 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

True rights do not rely on the consent and cooperation of others.


The 6th amendment disagrees.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

I'm arguing the assertion that you cannot have a right to other people's labor.
And you don't. EVERYONE that the courts reached out to as a PD is someone who chose to be available.

Saying that = a "right" to their labor is like saying my current employer has a "right" to my labor.

Which, of course, they don't.

quote:

We have the RIGHT to have a qualified lawyer on our behalf,
LOL. I guess if one uses the word qualified VERY loosely.

In any case. Go read a bit about places where there's like one PD in an entire district handling hundreds of cases and talk to me about this "right".

It's cute that you think this "right" actually exists in any meaningful manner.

It literally CANNOT exist in any meaningful manner no matter how many times its declared precisely because no, you can't actually kidnap some unwilling party to take the case.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
12182 posts
Posted on 2/16/20 at 12:26 pm to
You think getting into a car accident, having multiple surgeries and spending time in the ICU is cheap?
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram