- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Based on SCOTUS opinion DOJ asks Boasberg to cancel 4/8 hearing - *UPDATE: Hearing Vacated
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:45 am to jrodLSUke
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:45 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
Every time SFP has a OMB position and is proven wrong, he just simple claims that he was right all along.
I am right. A literal quote from the opinion yesterday
quote:
“It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law” in the context of removal proceedings.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:47 am to Paddyshack
quote:
Sorry the lawfare against Trump, that you claim doesn’t exist, failed again.
Ummmm. The Supreme Court literally ruled they could not simply use the law to deport them without fair hearings and protecting their habeas corpus rights.
SFP was right you dolts.
God, these Trumpits are just morons.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Every time SFP has a OMB position and is proven wrong, he just simple claims that he was right all along.
I am right. A literal quote from the opinion yesterday
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:51 am to Geauxgurt
quote:
Ummmm. The Supreme Court literally ruled they could not simply use the law to deport them without fair hearings and protecting their habeas corpus rights.
SFP was right you dolts.
God, these Trumpits are just morons.
The constant DKE in real time is... illuminating
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The constant DKE in real time is... illuminating
It’s quite impressive how stupid most of the people on this board are. Reminds me the blonde jokes from the eighties except replace the blondes with Trumpits and it amazingly is accurate.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:55 am to Geauxgurt
quote:
It’s quite impressive how stupid most of the people on this board are
quote:
Trumpits
Ya you sure are a brainiac…
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
You never argued it wasn't a correct jurisdiction, therefore, never questioned dear Judge Boasberg.
As far as illegal aliens rights. You actually fail again.
As 5 of the original illegal aliens of this case: were pulled from the planes manifest-- Because they were indeed allowed to show they were not gang members or otherwise dangerous criminals.
As far as illegal aliens rights. You actually fail again.
As 5 of the original illegal aliens of this case: were pulled from the planes manifest-- Because they were indeed allowed to show they were not gang members or otherwise dangerous criminals.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:56 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
Ya you sure are a brainiac…
Posted on 4/8/25 at 7:58 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
Ya you sure are a brainiac…
Oh wow. That went over your head did it? You think it was a misspelling?
God, this place is gold.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:02 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:02 am to cajunangelle
quote:
You never argued it wasn't a correct jurisdiction, therefore, never questioned dear Judge Boasberg.
And?
You're trying to frame this as some us/them, in/out group dynamic with Boasberg as some villain. That's silly and I don't engage in such irrationalities.
quote:
As far as illegal aliens rights. You actually fail again.
Read the quotes. The USSC confirmed yesterday they have 5A rights.
I was right. All the people who claimed "illegal aliens don't have rights" were proven wrong, again.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:02 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Read the quotes. The USSC confirmed yesterday they have 5A rights. I was right. All the people who claimed "illegal aliens don't have rights" were proven wrong, again.
So they have 2A rights?
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:09 am to Paddyshack
quote:
So they have 2A rights?
That's being litigated. I'm a "shall not" guy so I think they should, but we don't have USSC jurisprudence on that yet.
My personal opinion =/= a prediction in court ruling (I have to make that clear for the DKE crowd, who get confused, typically with the inverse scenario)
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's being litigated. I'm a "shall not" guy so I think they should, but we don't have USSC jurisprudence on that yet.
“Illegal migrants should have the right to bare arms in the United States while they are here illegally.”
You heard it from the horse’s mouth, folks.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:14 am to Paddyshack
quote:
So they have 2A rights?
Federal law makes it a crime for an illegal alien to possess a weapon. The circuits are split on the constitutionality of the statute and the Supreme court just denied writs, so we wait until the Supreme Court decides to resolve the split.
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:16 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:19 am to Paddyshack
quote:
“Illegal migrants should have the right to bare arms in the United States while they are here illegally.”
"shall not"
Posted on 4/8/25 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
But Boasberg had no jurisdiction. Nor the right to tell anyone to turn planes around. He's a black robed dictator trying to assume powers that he doesn't have.
Correct me if I am wrong but lost in all this is maybe the inference that District Court judges don't have the power to make sweeping nationwide orders.
"The People" in the Second Amendment does not include someone that is not a Citizen sir,
Correct me if I am wrong but lost in all this is maybe the inference that District Court judges don't have the power to make sweeping nationwide orders.
"The People" in the Second Amendment does not include someone that is not a Citizen sir,
This post was edited on 4/8/25 at 8:27 am
Popular
Back to top



4






