- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
AZ audit preview - better than watermarks
Posted on 8/20/21 at 12:37 am
Posted on 8/20/21 at 12:37 am
Jovan Pulitzer Reveals It’s Not the ‘Watermarks’ on the Ballots – It’s Better (VIDEO)
LINK. - GP
Jovan Pulitzer surprised us all once again and likely scared the hell out of any election fraudsters in the process. In a video he released Wednesday on Twitter, Jovan explained that identifying markings are in fact on the ballots and are exactly what they were looking for during the audit! He explained it wasn’t bamboo paper as audit detractors claimed, and it wasn’t secret “watermarks” either.
It was, however, a secret printer identifying protocol established years ago by the Secret Service to help catch counterfeiters.
LINK. - GP
Jovan Pulitzer surprised us all once again and likely scared the hell out of any election fraudsters in the process. In a video he released Wednesday on Twitter, Jovan explained that identifying markings are in fact on the ballots and are exactly what they were looking for during the audit! He explained it wasn’t bamboo paper as audit detractors claimed, and it wasn’t secret “watermarks” either.
It was, however, a secret printer identifying protocol established years ago by the Secret Service to help catch counterfeiters.
This post was edited on 8/20/21 at 12:49 am
Posted on 8/20/21 at 1:00 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
It was, however, a secret printer identifying protocol established years ago by the Secret Service to help catch counterfeiters.
If they catch them on that, I'll laugh uproarously.
Everyone knows they can ID printers.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 1:08 am to BuckyCheese
In the video you can see borders around the ballot created by the special printer process that are not visible to the naked eye spectrum
Posted on 8/20/21 at 6:08 am to Kjnstkmn
Gateway Pundit articles are so hard to read with all of their pop-ups and advertisements in the middle of articles.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 6:48 am to AUauditor
Biden “cmon man that was like days ago”
Posted on 8/20/21 at 6:54 am to Kjnstkmn
Sounds promising but I'm done getting my hopes up and then nothing comes of it.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 6:57 am to Kjnstkmn
Wake me when state authorities kick the door in on Maricopa election officials with a search warrant in hand.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:12 am to Kjnstkmn
This is interesting.
Some printers specifically do not use this (although that's not common) and only color printers printing in color (ie: not in b/w mode) will print the microdots.
This means that if the SoS was not using a color printer and printing them in color then any which have micodots are fakes. It also means that if they were printing them in color from a color printer then any which don't make the correct microdot sequences are fakes.
There could be issues if the SoS used multiple printers (including both B/W and color) and printed in both formats. At that point all you would really have left is to verify the codes on the ones printed in color. Again though, this would depend on the printing company and whether the AZ ballots had a mandatory color beyond black/white (if even one thing on the document is anything beyond the black/white/grey scale then the printer considers the whole thing to be "color").
Some printers specifically do not use this (although that's not common) and only color printers printing in color (ie: not in b/w mode) will print the microdots.
This means that if the SoS was not using a color printer and printing them in color then any which have micodots are fakes. It also means that if they were printing them in color from a color printer then any which don't make the correct microdot sequences are fakes.
There could be issues if the SoS used multiple printers (including both B/W and color) and printed in both formats. At that point all you would really have left is to verify the codes on the ones printed in color. Again though, this would depend on the printing company and whether the AZ ballots had a mandatory color beyond black/white (if even one thing on the document is anything beyond the black/white/grey scale then the printer considers the whole thing to be "color").
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:16 am to AUauditor
quote:
Gateway Pundit articles are so hard to read with all of their pop-ups and advertisements in the middle of articles.
Clearly that invalidates EVERYTHING alleged by Pulitzer, published elsewhere and merely reported by the GWP.
Congratulations! You've dEbOOnKeD! the entire election fraud morass by arguing against perceived poor website design.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:22 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
Everyone knows they can ID printers.
Hoping 'not everyone'. As many know (and was pointed out by the OP), this was to track the easy counterfeiting because a color copier (at the time) could do a great job...
Anyone try to copy money today? Make certain it isn't hooked to the internet.. (I kid about the last part... but only barely). Most copiers won't copy. Many printers won't print. But if they do, there is always the embedded printer ID.
The government said it was a problem... I hope it hangs liberals here.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:28 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
If they catch them on that, I
They have been "caught" on 20 different things and no one cares or ever does anything about it.
This is another instance of overwhelming cheating by the Filth. But the question remains, will anyone do anything?
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:32 am to Kjnstkmn
Tic toc tic toc...
I'd love for any of the proof in AZ, GA, Penn, etc. to be true, but lets be real, its not going to be.
Too far down the path at this point. Stuck with this trainwreck of an administration for another 3.5yrs.
I'd love for any of the proof in AZ, GA, Penn, etc. to be true, but lets be real, its not going to be.
Too far down the path at this point. Stuck with this trainwreck of an administration for another 3.5yrs.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:38 am to Lsut81
What are you talking about. It’s taking this long because Democrats have tried to kill the audits and stall them. They are also being thorough because anything not airtight will give the media holes to poke through. You are displaying terrible ignorance of what has actually happened
This post was edited on 8/20/21 at 7:39 am
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:39 am to Kjnstkmn
Ballots certainly should be as secure as $100 bills.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:39 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
In the video you can see borders around the ballot created by the special printer process that are not visible to the naked eye spectrum
Its not borders. Its dots further down in the actual image. They look like un-filled dots. Watch again.
Same principle though. (Splitting hairs but wanted others to know what they're looking at)
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:50 am to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
What are you talking about. It’s taking this long because Democrats have tried to kill the audits and stall them.
I wouldn’t even pin it solely on opposition.
This has to be ironclad, irrefutable, proof. There needs to be a detailed account of everything. It needs to be done in a way where nobody can claim there is a legal issue.
To operate in those bounds takes time.
Posted on 8/20/21 at 8:21 am to Kjnstkmn
I hope this is true, but like Powell, Giuliani, Wood, Montgomery, and Lindell, Pulitzer carries baggage (questionable business, appeared on the Treasure of Oak Island tc show, name change) which undermines his findings. I loathe the Democrats who are destroying our country, but we need more credible people to expose the fraudulent election. Up until now, it has been easy for the evil ones to attack the messenger which buries the fraud from most Americans who have the attention span of a 3 year and gets their info from mainstream and social media which are agents of the Dems.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News