Started By
Message

AZ audit preview - better than watermarks

Posted on 8/20/21 at 12:37 am
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
10534 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 12:37 am
Jovan Pulitzer Reveals It’s Not the ‘Watermarks’ on the Ballots – It’s Better (VIDEO)
LINK. - GP

Jovan Pulitzer surprised us all once again and likely scared the hell out of any election fraudsters in the process. In a video he released Wednesday on Twitter, Jovan explained that identifying markings are in fact on the ballots and are exactly what they were looking for during the audit! He explained it wasn’t bamboo paper as audit detractors claimed, and it wasn’t secret “watermarks” either.

It was, however, a secret printer identifying protocol established years ago by the Secret Service to help catch counterfeiters.
This post was edited on 8/20/21 at 12:49 am
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
48875 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 1:00 am to
quote:

It was, however, a secret printer identifying protocol established years ago by the Secret Service to help catch counterfeiters.



If they catch them on that, I'll laugh uproarously.

Everyone knows they can ID printers.
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
10534 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 1:08 am to
In the video you can see borders around the ballot created by the special printer process that are not visible to the naked eye spectrum
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
18948 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 1:26 am to
Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 1:27 am to
For reals this time!!!
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
16067 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 3:22 am to
Gfy
Posted by AUauditor
Georgia
Member since Sep 2004
984 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 6:08 am to
Gateway Pundit articles are so hard to read with all of their pop-ups and advertisements in the middle of articles.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5539 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 6:48 am to
Biden “cmon man that was like days ago”
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9904 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 6:54 am to
Sounds promising but I'm done getting my hopes up and then nothing comes of it.
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 6:57 am to
Wake me when state authorities kick the door in on Maricopa election officials with a search warrant in hand.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51488 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:12 am to
This is interesting.

Some printers specifically do not use this (although that's not common) and only color printers printing in color (ie: not in b/w mode) will print the microdots.

This means that if the SoS was not using a color printer and printing them in color then any which have micodots are fakes. It also means that if they were printing them in color from a color printer then any which don't make the correct microdot sequences are fakes.

There could be issues if the SoS used multiple printers (including both B/W and color) and printed in both formats. At that point all you would really have left is to verify the codes on the ones printed in color. Again though, this would depend on the printing company and whether the AZ ballots had a mandatory color beyond black/white (if even one thing on the document is anything beyond the black/white/grey scale then the printer considers the whole thing to be "color").
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59611 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:16 am to
quote:

Gateway Pundit articles are so hard to read with all of their pop-ups and advertisements in the middle of articles.

Clearly that invalidates EVERYTHING alleged by Pulitzer, published elsewhere and merely reported by the GWP.

Congratulations! You've dEbOOnKeD! the entire election fraud morass by arguing against perceived poor website design.
Posted by captainFid
Vestavia, AL
Member since Dec 2014
4692 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:22 am to
quote:

Everyone knows they can ID printers.



Hoping 'not everyone'. As many know (and was pointed out by the OP), this was to track the easy counterfeiting because a color copier (at the time) could do a great job...

Anyone try to copy money today? Make certain it isn't hooked to the internet.. (I kid about the last part... but only barely). Most copiers won't copy. Many printers won't print. But if they do, there is always the embedded printer ID.

The government said it was a problem... I hope it hangs liberals here.

Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
16396 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:28 am to
quote:

If they catch them on that, I


They have been "caught" on 20 different things and no one cares or ever does anything about it.


This is another instance of overwhelming cheating by the Filth. But the question remains, will anyone do anything?
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80101 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:32 am to
Tic toc tic toc...



I'd love for any of the proof in AZ, GA, Penn, etc. to be true, but lets be real, its not going to be.

Too far down the path at this point. Stuck with this trainwreck of an administration for another 3.5yrs.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:38 am to
What are you talking about. It’s taking this long because Democrats have tried to kill the audits and stall them. They are also being thorough because anything not airtight will give the media holes to poke through. You are displaying terrible ignorance of what has actually happened
This post was edited on 8/20/21 at 7:39 am
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19397 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:39 am to
Ballots certainly should be as secure as $100 bills.
Posted by Dandy Chiggins
Member since Jan 2021
498 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:39 am to
quote:

In the video you can see borders around the ballot created by the special printer process that are not visible to the naked eye spectrum


Its not borders. Its dots further down in the actual image. They look like un-filled dots. Watch again.

Same principle though. (Splitting hairs but wanted others to know what they're looking at)
Posted by fjlee90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
7832 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 7:50 am to
quote:

What are you talking about. It’s taking this long because Democrats have tried to kill the audits and stall them.


I wouldn’t even pin it solely on opposition.

This has to be ironclad, irrefutable, proof. There needs to be a detailed account of everything. It needs to be done in a way where nobody can claim there is a legal issue.

To operate in those bounds takes time.
Posted by Drury01
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2015
596 posts
Posted on 8/20/21 at 8:21 am to
I hope this is true, but like Powell, Giuliani, Wood, Montgomery, and Lindell, Pulitzer carries baggage (questionable business, appeared on the Treasure of Oak Island tc show, name change) which undermines his findings. I loathe the Democrats who are destroying our country, but we need more credible people to expose the fraudulent election. Up until now, it has been easy for the evil ones to attack the messenger which buries the fraud from most Americans who have the attention span of a 3 year and gets their info from mainstream and social media which are agents of the Dems.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram