Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

"Assault weapons" have no significant purpose for citizens BUT

Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:56 pm
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41607 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:56 pm
should still be allowed. A ban would do nothing to stop violence, whether or not liberals want to admit it.
This post was edited on 2/21/18 at 2:02 pm
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
4653 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:56 pm to
Well then I guess sho is enough of a reason to own one.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101407 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

BUT sho



Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57221 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:57 pm to
I understand they're awesome hunting rifles.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35491 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:57 pm to
Fo sho
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118782 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:57 pm to
What is an assault weapon?
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16572 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:59 pm to
Love to see you define this lack of significant purpose, especially in the context of the 2nd Amendment and applicable US Supreme Court decisions.
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 1:59 pm to
I own some lazy arse assault weapons because they just lie around all day not doin' nuthin'
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89531 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Assault weapons" have no significant purpose for citizens


The hell you say - they're VITALLY important to the core purpose of the Second Amendment.
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
22089 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

The hell you say - they're VITALLY important to the core purpose of the Second Amendment.



This, this, this.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 2:06 pm to
You don't think self defense (against criminals and government) is significant?
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25986 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 2:09 pm to
They are weapons of war!



















J/k
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24817 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

no significant purpose for citizens
They're gonna be pretty useful when the dems drop our border security enough that the commies waltz in and invade.
Posted by Presidio
Member since Nov 2017
3060 posts
Posted on 2/21/18 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

I understand they're awesome hunting rifles.


As a matter of fact they are, particularly if you're hunting government tyrants; which is, after all, the purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
This post was edited on 2/21/18 at 2:48 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram