- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Arguing over the ICE incident being a “good or bad” shot is completely missing the point
Posted on 1/11/26 at 8:18 pm to Bass Tiger
Posted on 1/11/26 at 8:18 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:Correct, and too many people are using that as their basis for determining her guilt.
All I know with 100% certainty is this, if that ICE officer would have been run over and killed by Ms Good no one on the left would give two shits and the Gaslight Media wouldn't either.
0
Posted on 1/11/26 at 8:26 pm to TX Tiger
The part of the video that blows my mind the most are what people do around the scene of the crime. After seeing someone shot at point blank range, the people run right at the person with the gun screaming at him. These people are so detached from reality their basic survival instincts are completely absent.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 8:30 pm to novabill
quote:
The shooter did wrong, killed when he could have avoided it.
You're not living in the real world. The ICE officer didn't "do wrong", sport, he reacted in a defensive manner towards a woman who refused clear and direct orders to stop and get out of the vehicle.
IT'S THAT SIMPLE.
No if's, no yeah but's, no nothing else you can dream up to make the situation something other than it actually was.
She did this. 100%
Posted on 1/11/26 at 8:59 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Punishable by death.
Nope, but you already knew that
Posted on 1/11/26 at 8:59 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
What are the rules on escalating an incident?
Once you cross a line, you just might get shot dead
Posted on 1/11/26 at 9:00 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
If her intention was to run him over, she had multiple far more direct opportunities before the incident ever happened.
Her intention is irrelevant.
This isn’t:
quote:
SHE chose to accelerate the vehicle with an agent in PLAIN SIGHT.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 9:04 pm to novabill
quote:
Too many are determining the shooting was bad because of their view on immigration.
Fixed that for you
Posted on 1/11/26 at 9:06 pm to novabill
The sequence of events is exculpatory for the LEO.
A two-woman team of trained obstructionists were unlawfully blocking a road.
When LEO approached the motor vehicle, one of the women, who was standing outside the MV, confronted the LEO with a verbal provocation that included insults, challenges and a firm indication that they had no intention of doing anything other than defying the LEO.
LEO ordered the MV operator to exit the MV. LEO were opening the MV door to further indicate that the MV operator was being taken into custody for questioning.
At that point, the woman outside the MV said to the MV operator "Drive!" while she was opening the passenger door to enter the MV.
MV operator ignored the clear LEO officer to halt and get out of the car. MV operator's response to the LEO command was to put her foot on the MV accelerator.
Was the LEO just supposed to pretend that they did not order the MV operator to halt and exit the MV? Just let it slide?
How was the LEO supposed to stop the MV operator who was attempting to flee from LEO custody?
Why would you want the LEO to take the risk of allowing these two fleeing suspected criminals to drive away in that MV? Was the LEO just supposed to trust to these two women's good nature that they wouldn't try to run over LEO? After all, the MV operator did slightly hit one LEO.
A two-woman team of trained obstructionists were unlawfully blocking a road.
When LEO approached the motor vehicle, one of the women, who was standing outside the MV, confronted the LEO with a verbal provocation that included insults, challenges and a firm indication that they had no intention of doing anything other than defying the LEO.
LEO ordered the MV operator to exit the MV. LEO were opening the MV door to further indicate that the MV operator was being taken into custody for questioning.
At that point, the woman outside the MV said to the MV operator "Drive!" while she was opening the passenger door to enter the MV.
MV operator ignored the clear LEO officer to halt and get out of the car. MV operator's response to the LEO command was to put her foot on the MV accelerator.
Was the LEO just supposed to pretend that they did not order the MV operator to halt and exit the MV? Just let it slide?
How was the LEO supposed to stop the MV operator who was attempting to flee from LEO custody?
Why would you want the LEO to take the risk of allowing these two fleeing suspected criminals to drive away in that MV? Was the LEO just supposed to trust to these two women's good nature that they wouldn't try to run over LEO? After all, the MV operator did slightly hit one LEO.
This post was edited on 1/11/26 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 1/11/26 at 9:08 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
The blood of this woman is purely on Jacob Frey and the Democrats
Eh, Frey isn’t any more culpable than any other stupid fricking liberal.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News