- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another former J6'er dead
Posted on 1/29/25 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/29/25 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
She pointed it at the men.
According to who? Did they investigate beyond just taking their word for it?
Does she have a right to point a gun at people on her private property and tell them to leave? Are you capable of distinguishing between her private property and the public streets where the Rittenhouse thing went down?
1
Posted on 1/29/25 at 9:00 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Does she have a right to point a gun at people on her private property and tell them to leave?
You better be able to articulate reasonable and sincere feelings of threats if you're going to do this.
quote:
Did they investigate beyond just taking their word for it?
The lady was clearly in the process of a breakdown and her life was spiraling. If the 2 men had a legitimate reason for being there, what other reasonable explanation is there?
It's not like a shooting-homicide isn't going to be investigated thoroughly.
This lady wasn't some important person to execute. That makes no sense.
If she was executed by professionals, why would they do it in such a public fashion that would lead to the most intense of investigations?
Posted on 1/29/25 at 9:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I mean even the X post/tweet in OP has a video of the lady saying they had to break windows to get into the capitol, and how they were teargassed. Consider those comments in light of all the violence against LEO in the riot outside of the capitol just prior to that, and you get a better picture of what he's talking about.
Sure there was some violence. I said in my original post that it could be considered a riot. But calling it an "attack" brings about a completely different concept with a different end-goal. That is disingenuous language.
Posted on 1/29/25 at 9:55 am to the808bass
quote:
Almost none of that is accurate. You don’t need a stand your ground law in almost any state (perhaps with the exception of Minnesota) to defend yourself against someone brandishing a weapon.
This we will disagree on. As far as how accurate this is. But it's going to come largely from perspective. Mine is coming from the view of keeping ourselves out of jail or prison, when prosecutors come after us for exercising our rights.
It's 100% accurate that every state has its own definition of castle doctrine, and the states that have stand your ground, can vary on those laws from state to state.
It's also 100% accurate that there are states that do not have stand your ground laws.
it's also accurate that there are states who have twisted it, in regards to when you can defend yourself.
I'll refer back to NJ me. I lived there so it's familiar to me. Again, they are a duty to retreat state.
Say that I get into an argument with someone, and they end up punching me in the face. I then take them down. If cops get involved one or both of us could get arrested, in NJ.
Person who punched me in the face is most likely going to spend a couple hours in jail. Now, did I throw him to the ground and then remove myself to a safe distance? If so, I'm most likely ok.
Did I take him down, and then take further measures against him? I'm most likely going to jail too. Because I did not retreat.
You and I live in an amazing state, that gives us so much freedom to protect ourselves. States like New Jersey, and NY will find whatever measures they can think up, to punish those that do so.
Posted on 1/29/25 at 10:33 am to PsychTiger
quote:
Uh, why not?
Seattle, Washington
Posted on 1/29/25 at 12:57 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Is it typical that doctors will lose their medical licenses over unrelated (to their practice) misdemeanor convictions?
If they are Trump supporters? Yes. Just like they have done with attorneys who have represented and/or publicly supported Trump. Stripped them of their law licenses.
Posted on 1/29/25 at 1:27 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
Uh, why not?
Read below the video. She was being served papers for foreclosure on her house, she pulled out a shotgun on the servers and one of them shot and killed her.
Posted on 1/29/25 at 1:29 pm to Night Vision
I'm all for the 1/6 pardons but it seems like some of these 1/6 folks aren't the best and brightest among us
Posted on 1/29/25 at 1:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm guessing it was ruled self defense
Yeah, ok. We'll just ignore all the other "self defense" cases where the shooter was not allowed to walk as if nothing happened.
I'm guessing the cops are not investigating further due to who was killed and this occurring in Seattle.
Posted on 1/29/25 at 7:36 pm to boosiebadazz
Over half of them had prior convictions
Posted on 1/29/25 at 8:06 pm to Stonehenge
quote:
Over half of them had prior convictions
Half of who?
Page 6 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News