re: Andrew Weissman says McCabe is not in the clear

quote:

---

I read every word you say as long as you take me to the prom, Davy...

---

I'll be there to pick you up in mom's station wagon, corsage in hand.

quote:

---

And read this and let me know what you think...

---

Interesting article, but what jumps out to me at first glance is the fact that the McCabe announcement last week and doesn't have anything to do with seditious activity against the President. The "sedition investigation," to my knowledge, is still ingoing via the Durham investigation. If it comes to pass that a press conference or announcement occurs wherein the DOJ says "We've concluded the Durham investigation and find there are no prosecutable cases," then we have a potentially dangerous and volatile situation at that point. But it just hasn't come to pass yet. Not saying it won't, but I remain hopeful that that will not be the case.

In the meantime, it just seems dangerous itself, and irresponsible, to overly apply this very limited McCabe announcement to matters to which it doesn't relate. Those unrelated assumptions are causing people to believe the worst case scenario has occurred, when it simply has not as of this moment.

Also, I don't get the proposition that there must necessarily be protection of upper elements of the DOJ, lest there be an implosion of the integrity of the entire government. Why isn't it possible to simply identify wrongdoers, remove and prosecute them, replace with better and trustworthy people, and learn lessons to stay more vigilent from then on? After all, if a President is exposed for wrongdoing and is impeached and removed, it doesn't collapse the entire government....the VP is simply sworn in and it keeps on trucking from there.

quote:

---

Corsi came out and said

---

Jerome Corsi?

They are all going to get away with it.

Weissman is just assisting the MSM with a narrative for the Filth to swallow.

humor break



Video

quote:

---

Why would you need to “swap” a case? Bring all charges against him. All. There is a better chance of making a charge stick using the shotgun approach.

---

Of course.

And why does this one more inconvenient truth even have to be stated.

Were principals in this type of scandal reversed, the Dems at this point would be in their 3rd year of a Grand Jury/Indictment festival.

And they would be assisted by D.C. kangaroo courts and juries, and the enthusiastic, salivating national press pumping every proceeding into the nation's living rooms 24/7 with full malice aforethought that they were seriously impacting any chance of fair trials for the accused.

Convictions would be piling up on top of each other, and the makers of orange prison raiments would be hard pressed to keep up with the demand.

Have been aware for some time now of the reason for this level of "resolve," after hearing the early "admission" for the glacier-like malingering, stonewalling, and dancing from one of the Repub's own.

At the 9/20/19 point of this theater, the interview on local 990AM with former Colorado State Senator Ted Harvey who heads the "Committee to Defend the President."

He laid out all this committee was involved in and painted a rosy, frilly picture about what all these stalwart Repubs were doing for Trump.

Until the host reminded him of how Trump has had to drag so many of his Party across the finish line, and the tortoise-like actions by Horowitz and Barr.

And that's when the truth was squeezed out of the Senator.

His response was that the Repubs were "only going to press those cases that they felt they had a real chance of obtaining convictions."

And there it was - the "out" and the tack the Repubs had always intended to use as an excuse for their tepid, cautious approach to investigating the nation's worst scandal since Tammany Hall and Credit Mobilier - only a considerably worse threat to the Republic.

And with this approach they provide even more grist for the smug Left to continue mocking those expecting justice for attempting to give legs to what has been nothing more than a "conspiracy theory."

LINK

<3

So Bull shite Durham investigation

I mean lot of talk from tic toc and no action. Time will tell the tale and it’s always the next investigation. If nothing happens by July than you can write everything off as bS

That Sperry tweet precludes that there's a reason to interview McCabe, and/or that the evidence doesn't stand on its own.

None of us know what the USAs are looking at, to be sure, but that tweet is leading a premise that nothing will happen. Piss-poor journalism from Sperry.

Trust Weismann