Started By
Message

re: Among those you know, is the City of St. George issue partisan?

Posted on 1/6/14 at 11:54 am to
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36618 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:

It's not too late. All it takes is a City Parish Ordinance to incorporate new areas.


So why don't they???????

I'll tell you why, they don't want "us" in.

Am I wrong? If so why haven't they taken in more areas that would be "profitable"?
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53119 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 12:12 pm to
Here's a question.

If St. George claims that 2/3 of the tax base resides within St. George. And if others say that this is not true, and that St. George does not contribute that much in taxes.

Then why is Baton Rouge expected to crumble if the taxes from St. George are no longer there?

If the push to keep St. George from incorporating, is to save Baton Rouge from economic decline, wouldn't that infer that St. George contributes a very large tax percentage to the area?

Also, if St. George does not produce a substantial sum of taxes towards BR city gov, then how could a "break away" hurt BR?

If St. George does not produce a large sum of taxes to the BR city gov then, if a break away happens, the city should still be able to sustain itself in present form correct? If not, then you are admitting that St. George puts in, more than they benefit from, in terms of the city government taxes.
Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15418 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

It's not too late. All it takes is a City Parish Ordinance to incorporate new areas.


So why don't they???????


They don't have to incorporate us if they pull this heist off.

quote:

East Baton Rouge Parish officials are trying to pass an ordinance that would lock tax funds collected from unincorporated parts of the parish into the city-parish budget.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127355 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

claims that 2/3 of the tax base resides within St. George. And if others say that this is not true
quote:

Then why is Baton Rouge expected to crumble if the taxes from St. George are no longer there?
Stop being so melodramatic. Baton Rouge will NOT crumble.

And anyone who thinks the SG area is responsible for 2/3 of the total tax revenues of EBR and the city of BR is a complete idiot. Dr. Richardson estimates in his report that BR will lose $53 million in taxes. The budget for EBR is almost $800 million. The SG organizers say the loss to BR will be $14 million.

The loss of taxes will be hurt BR mainly from the loss of sales taxes from the retail outlets at the Mall of La and surrounding stores.

But that loss won't happen. Those areas will either be incorporated into BR or the tax proposal linked in one of these SG threads will be passed, either of which means SG will not see the sales taxes from the Mall of La.

Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

wouldn't that infer that St. George contributes a very large tax percentage to the area


There's multiple things going on here. Part of it is because the city-parish general fund pays for parish-wide infrastructure and that the proposed new city will keep the infrastructure but would like to not have to pay for (some of) the bond debt which is funded mostly through sales taxes.
This post was edited on 1/6/14 at 2:09 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36618 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Also, if St. George does not produce a substantial sum of taxes towards BR city gov, then how could a "break away" hurt BR?


St. George is NOT trying to break away. They want to incorporate. They want to remain in EBR Parish.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36129 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:17 pm to
quote:



St. George is NOT trying to break away. They want to incorporate. They want to remain in EBR Parish.





THey want the benefits of living near a city without having to pay for them.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36618 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

There's multiple things going on here. Part of it is because the city-parish general fund pays for parish-wide infrastructure and that the proposed new city will keep the infrastructure but would like to not have to pay for (some of) the bond debt which is funded mostly through sales taxes


I agree, it is a complex situation and it is designed that way.

It's almost like a street corner shell game where people try to identify under which cup the marble is located.

I believe it's by design, and to maintain the status quo for the city who sucks money out of the parish taxpayers at every turn.

Look at the sewer user fee that everyone pays, but few no what for and whether or not it is being well managed.

We start off in one direction with a sewer plan, another mayor gets elected, and an alternate plan is enacted supposedly to save us money.

Have you seen any of the savings yet?

All I see is rising sewer bills and sewer work all over town. I see a sewer plant closing, I see one being expanded. I never hear why just that the EPA made us do it.

Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36618 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

THey want the benefits of living near a city without having to pay for them


Where did you come up with that notion?

I suspect people living close to BR would want city police and fire services.

In fact I bet there are thousands of people living outside the city but believe they are in it. Many do not know where the boundaries are.

Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96920 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Many do not know where the boundaries are.


Bingo.

The boundaries of the city are arse-backwards if you're looking at where all the development has been in the past 30+ years.


Essen, Bluebonnet, Siegen, Jones Creek, etc., are either partially or completely outside BR.

If you look at a map, there's a giant hole in the southeastern part of the parish, from roughly Essen at Perkins to Sherwood Forest, where they could easily have incorporated but chose not to do so, as it would have filled a gap between two different parts of the city which had been incorporated since about 1973 and 1983, respectively.
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

THey want the benefits of living near a city without having to pay for them.


They City wants the benefit of their money but not their input. Works both ways.

How about this. They keep their money and the city keeps theirs. Talk about fair!!
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

How so? I'm pretty sure you're wrong about that


CATS is a prime example.

CATS runs outside of the city and into the parishes.

However they didn't want to allow a Parish wide vote. They had to limit the vote to the city where they knew they could pass the increase in property tax.

There is one example.
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:48 pm to
Does St George plan to fully account for legacy costs as well as their portion of all bond debts for infrastructure provided to the area? Will they promise no new taxes for city services (schools don't count)?

Will Lionel Rainey and Bodi White agree to sign a legal document saying that neither they or their immediate family will win a contract with, be employed by, or sell land to the new city or any of its contractors? If the answer is no..
Posted by skinny domino
sebr
Member since Feb 2007
14353 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

CATS runs outside of the city and into the parishes.

BS - Cats does not leave EBR.
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:53 pm to
quote:


CATS runs outside of the city and into the parishes.



BS - Cats does not leave EBR.


Read my post.

It runs outside of the city of Baton Rouge - FACT

It may not run outside of EBR and maybe I should of stated that better, however it runs outside the city of Baton Rouge into areas that were not allowed to vote on the tax increase.

FACT
Posted by skinny domino
sebr
Member since Feb 2007
14353 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

maybe I should of stated that better
Posted by Elcid96
Member since May 2010
5465 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Does St George plan to fully account for legacy costs as well as their portion of all bond debts for infrastructure provided to the area? Will they promise no new taxes for city services (schools don't count)?


I don't know or care.

I am sure the people in the proposed area wouldn't mind paying more if they actually got something back for their money or a better return on it.

quote:

Will Lionel Rainey and Bodi White agree to sign a legal document saying that neither they or their immediate family will win a contract with, be employed by, or sell land to the new city or any of its contractors? If the answer is no..


What does this have to do with anything?

Yeah, I am sure people will profit, politics are in most regards dirty. The people will decide in a vote. Period.

If a family thinks it will improve their situation they will vote for it and not give two shits if someone elses families benefits from a contract. You wanna know why? Because right now they aren't being heard anyway!!!
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

It may not run outside of EBR and maybe I should of stated that better, however it runs outside the city of Baton Rouge into areas that were not allowed to vote on the tax increase.


Correct. People in St George do NOT pay for CATS even though it serves their area. OMG, BR city subsidizes St George!
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36618 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Correct. People in St George do NOT pay for CATS even though it serves their area. OMG, BR city subsidizes St George!


CATS is a regional transit system. It gets parish funds and not just city funds.

Read their budget.
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 1/6/14 at 3:01 pm to
You don't care about corruption and don't mind paying more for it. Got it.

What extra city services are you expecting, btw?
This post was edited on 1/6/14 at 3:02 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram