- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: American Curiosity: Disclose the Facts?
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:56 am to oogabooga68
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:56 am to oogabooga68
quote:Upvoting yourself again, Ooga?
Little man, you need to work on your Shtick....
You are an odd little person.
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 10:58 am
Posted on 7/30/20 at 10:59 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Most Americans would want to know the nature of that gathering, true or false?
We’d have to trace every place Cain was before he got Covid to pinpoint where he was infected. Maybe he got Covid at Walmart
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:04 am to SSpaniel
quote:Many indeed may not care, but 99.9% is obviously a ridiculous assertion.
I don't think that 99.9% of Americans care one whit how Herman Cain (or anyone else, for that matter) got Covid.
At a minimum, I think most DEMS would want this information. Let's call that 35% of the populace or so. Let's say about half of Independents ... maybe another 10% of the populace. Let's say only 5% of Republican voters would be interested and call that another 2% of the populace.
That is about 47% of Americans.
Why would the media NOT report something that is ... at a minimum ... "interesting" to almost half of all Americans? Because it might be interpreted as unflattering to the Great Orange Deity?
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 11:12 am
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:05 am to AggieHank86
Liberal Hank exposing himself yet again
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:10 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Liberal Hank exposing himself yet again

Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
If someone contracted COVID immediately after attending a protest event, I would have absolutely no problem with that fact being reported.
Seems to me that you’re completely missing the fact that YOUR liberal media would NEVER say something even remotely negative about the protests
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:21 am to AggieHank86
quote:
obviously a ridiculous assertion.
Something you know quite a lot about.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:22 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:First, I missed nothing. I was discussing one, distinct question. Feel free to present other questions to your heart's content.
Seems to me that you’re completely missing the fact that YOUR liberal media would NEVER (report on COVID exposure at a protest).
Second, your (silly) opinion is not a "fact"
Third, I disagree with that (silly) opinion.
Fourth, I addressed the substance of the issue presented by the poster to whom I was responding. Excuse me for not presciently responding to whatever random thought might pop into YOUR head.
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 11:29 am
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:26 am to AggieHank86
Little man, since you are so DESPERATE for attention, may I suggest getting a puppy?
Oh, .........
Oh, .........
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:28 am to AggieHank86
quote:
silly
quote:
silly
And... Hank with the insult... what's next, name calling, or did I already miss that?
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:31 am to SSpaniel
quote:
And... Hank with the insult... what's next, name calling, or did I already miss that?
For all his self-fellating about his imaginary "Super-Super-Superior Intellect", he really is a very simple, small, predictable person.....
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Agreed on both points.
And just to add to what I said, if they are definitively stating that he contracted COVID at the rally, then they are just amplifying the criticisms that they are agenda-driven. Again, I haven't watched any of the coverage.
I find it interesting that some posters are seemingly suggesting they would be content with no mention of the rally attendance. Much like with the frontline doctors, put the info out there and let people decide. So much for principles I guess.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:31 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Liberal Hank exposing himself yet again
Did he mention he is a lawyer?
A LAWYER!
He already did the "take a position and be a dickhole, while pretending not to take a dickhole position" thing in his OP. Spiking the football on Herman Cain's coffin.
Did he say "sweet baby Jesus" 36 times yet in this thread?
Ooooooh, or did he talk down to you yet and pretend that you "just don't understand"?
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 11:32 am
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:37 am to DeusVultMachina
quote:
Did he say "sweet baby Jesus" 36 times yet in this thread? Ooooooh, or did he talk down to you yet and pretend that you "just don't understand"?
You're got his shtick down perfectly!
Wait, you're not one of his alters who secretly upvotes his posts, are you?
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:41 am to oogabooga68
I'm not smart enough to be principledHank's alter, lol.
No one is.
No one is.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:45 am to DeusVultMachina
quote:
I'm not smart enough to be principledHank's alter, lol.
No one is.
We need to get Displaced unbanned... then find a subject that he and Hank vehemently disagree on. And sit back and watch.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:46 am to AggieHank86
My understanding of the logic of the mask is it protects others around you, not you. And it’s at best a 3% or so less chance with a piece of cloth...if that.
The mask narrative is silly.
The mask narrative is silly.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:47 am to SSpaniel
quote:
We need to get Displaced unbanned... then find a subject that he and Hank vehemently disagree on. And sit back and watch
Lol. I will bring the popcorn.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 11:49 am to SSpaniel
quote:
We need to get Displaced unbanned... then find a subject that he and Hank vehemently disagree on. And sit back and watch.

Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:My guesss is you're trying to work an equivalency between Herman Cain attenting a Trump rally and the spike that occurred after protests.
"Prominent American Joe Blow died today from COVID. He was diagnosed and hospitalized soon after attending a large public gathering at which attendees did not adhere to CDC recommendations for mask use and social distancing."
Most Americans would want to know the nature of that gathering, true or false?
But that would stupid (thus, expected). In one case you have a sample size of ONE, with a causal effect of ONE. In the other you have millions and a causal effect of millions.
Good grief.
Popular
Back to top



0






