re: All You Had To Do Was Critically Investigate 911 And None Of This Would Be Happening

quote:

---

The USS Cole was not a false flag. It actually WAS done by Al Qaeda and a small motorboat riding up next to the Cole with waving occupants that crashed into the ship

---

Yes but we should not overlook the reality that al-Queda itself had origins that are linked to our nation’s wholly corrupt national security apparatus. al-Queda was an offshoot of the CIA’s clandestine funding of Afghan rebels (Operation Cyclone) during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

In a similar manner Saddam Hussien — like Osama bin Laden — was once an asset to our nation’s wholly corrupted national security apparatus.



Continuing this pattern, ISIS was also partially a creation of this apparatus. The following headline from March of 2016 sums up the circular futility of our nation’s war efforts in the Middle East for at least the past 25 years or so:



And isn’t it odd how when Trump ended Operation Timber Sycamore — the CIA’s covert funding of “moderate” jihadists in Syria — the molt of ISIS was greatly decreased across much of the Middle East?



Behind the Sudden Death of a $1 5Billion Secret C.I.A. War in Syria: The shuttering of the C.I.A. program, one of the most expensive efforts to arm and train rebels since the agency’s program arming the mujahedeen in Afghanistan during the 1980s, has forced a reckoning over its successes and failures....

After we repeatedly witness these same patterns over and over again, the logical fallacy at play here is to assume that it is all an unfortunate accident that our nation’s national security apparatus routinely aids and funds our enemies to further it’s corrupt agenda.

Why do I have the feeling that OP probably thinks sandy hook never happened

quote:

---

In 1987 I stood on the 92 floor, (I believe), that had been cleared of all interior walls, for Asbestos abatement. I was shocked at the view. I could see clearly all around, because other than the elevator shafts, there seemed to be nothing to hold it up. That is when it was brought to my attention that the "Outer Skin" was the support.

Interwoven steel beams that were designed to survive just such an "accident" from a commercial airliner.

The few beams on the inside were caked with a thick layer of sprayed on asbestos, for fire retardance.

---

They were built to withstand the impact of a 737. The was a plaque on the observation floor depicting a plane crashing into the building that stated this fact.

quote:

---

There wasn't nearly the amount of rubble that should have been there.

---

You realize that buildings have massive empty spaces for people to use, right? Most of the space was occupied by empty air. It’s not like you’re going to see the exact same outline of the building as it was standing if it’s collapsed on the ground.


That’s like me putting together a 10in by 10in cardboard box and then smashing it flat and calling it a conspiracy because the box is no longer 10in by 10in when it’s smashed flat.

quote:

---

And this right here shows your limitations in your research and understanding.

---

Okay let’s entertain your superior research and understanding.

quote:

---

Again, I ask, what was referred to as 'ground zero' prior to 9/11/01. It was a universal term for something.

---

This one?

quote:

---

the point on the surface of the earth or water directly below, directly above, or at which an atomic or hydrogen bomb explodes.

---

Go ahead.

quote:

---

You realize that buildings have massive empty spaces for people to use, right? Most of the space was occupied by empty air. It’s not like you’re going to see the exact same outline of the building as it was standing if it’s collapsed on the ground.


That’s like me putting together a 10in by 10in cardboard box and then smashing it flat and calling it a conspiracy because the box is no longer 10in by 10in when it’s smashed flat.

---

Nah, it'd be nothing like that.

Really bad analogy.

quote:

---

Imagine pushing aside 2.3 Trillion Dollars and ignoring that both locations that housed that data were destroyed on the same day with the idea that had anything other than a plane hit the Pentagon the damage would've been bigger. Imagine being that afraid to see.

---

That’s not an argument for what we’re discussing.


You’re basically saying “they would want to preserve the French Quarter and CBD! That’s why they blew the levees!” without providing any evidence that the levees were intentionally breached.

quote:

---

Okay let’s entertain your superior research and understanding.

---

If you asked how it would be turned to dust, you obviously have not come into contact with the research you claim to have.

Dr Judy Wood explains her ideas for dustification via directed energy.

It's more likely to have been nuclear from underneath, which plays in line with the first-hand accounts of explosions from under the building before impact above.

Never mind....youre clinical

quote:

---

If you asked how it would be turned to dust, you obviously have not come into contact with the research you claim to have.

---

No, I have. I just wanted you to post it for everyone so that they could see how frickin bonkers you are.