Started By
Message

re: All You Had To Do Was Critically Investigate 911 And None Of This Would Be Happening

Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:46 pm to
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18160 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

Yes Toomer Al Qaeda was definitely a US Created entity.


With that mind, any attack by al-Queda could arguably be categorized as a false flag attack. And that includes 9/11.

Now am I suggesting that the CIA actually organized and planned the attack? No.

But I am suggesting that elements in our wholly corrupt national security apparatus certainly were aware that an attack on such a horrific scale was possible. And that such an attack would not only galvanize public opinion for further entanglement in the Middle East, the resulting War on Terror® could be used as a justification to initiate an era of unending war.

With such a mindset, 1000s of innocent citizens killed in a terrorist attack are simply seen as a form of collateral damage that are necessary to fulfill those goals. These are wholly amoral entities we are talking about.
This post was edited on 8/1/21 at 5:57 pm
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18160 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

Why do I have the feeling that OP probably thinks sandy hook never happened





Ask him directly and maybe he will answer….
This post was edited on 8/1/21 at 5:49 pm
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38261 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

You hadn't because you were perplexed by the concept of dustification. This was new to you in this thread.




I know all of the stupid conspiracy theories. I baited you.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28505 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

the concept of dustification. This was new to you in this thread.

So to make sure I understand...there was a upward pointing nuclear bomb exploding through the elevator shaft that "dustified" everything?

Do I have that correct?
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18160 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

Was Rumsfeld in on it? Or looking for truth?


Talk about a career Deep State toady: any case of Rumsfeld looking for the truth is wholly incidental.

Is it too soon to piss on his grave?



Oh well. Tough titty.

Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
54238 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:56 pm to
They even gave you the playbook.
quote:

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28505 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 5:58 pm to
My question stands though.

If he was in ANY WAY connected to destroying evidence of the missing trillions, why announce said trillions the day before? You know he couldve postponed that PC
This post was edited on 8/1/21 at 5:59 pm
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38261 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Do I have that correct?


Yeah, you do.
Posted by allrightX3
Lone Star
Member since Jul 2021
140 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

My question stands though.

If he was in ANY WAY connected to destroying evidence of the missing trillions, why announce said trillions the day before? You know he couldve postponed that PC



I think filling in the blanks with assumption/theory is not important and derails the progress of anyone trying to take a journey of growth-in-understanding.

It's more important for people to become aware of all or as many puzzle pieces as possible so they can at least see that there is a puzzle to assemble.

2.3 trillion missing is a puzzle piece. The fact the budget analyst office was destroyed at the Pentagon is a puzzle piece. The fact that information + the SEC info was housed at the destroyed WTC7 site is another puzzle piece.

Acquiring these puzzle pieces, and the thousands like them is how growth-in-understanding occurs on this topic.


Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18160 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

If he was in ANY WAY connected to destroying evidence of the missing trillions, why announce said trillions the day before?


FWIW, I’m not claiming Rumsfeld was involved in destroying the evidence or that Rumsfeld was involved in plotting the 9/11 attacks.

But to answer your question, the shortfall was announced in the same manner as any other massive Beltway scandal — to get in front of the story and offer spin.
This post was edited on 8/1/21 at 7:00 pm
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38261 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 6:44 pm to
I forgot to add this in with the Pentagon stuff from earlier

The engines punched through to the C ring of the Pentagon where they were found

LINK

LINK

LINK
This post was edited on 8/1/21 at 6:45 pm
Posted by allrightX3
Lone Star
Member since Jul 2021
140 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 6:51 pm to
Well, good thing you've added them now.

Thanks for sharing a picture of a hole in a wall and a small part of an engine.

Now that we see a hole in the wall and some small fragments of plane debris we can rest assured there was no foul play involved in destroying the Pentagons budget analyst office and WTC7, where information on the missing 2.3 Trillion was housed, on the same day.
This post was edited on 8/1/21 at 6:54 pm
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18160 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

See my posts in the thread


I read your post where you claimed you offered “bait” for the OP.

Look, after following these debates for a long time, I don’t think arguments over “dustification” is a discussion that will shed any light on the topic.

Yet on the same token, neither will playing games of “gotcha!”

Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38261 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Now that we see a hole in the wall and some small fragments of plane debris we can rest assured there was no foul play involved in destroying the Pentagons budget analyst office and WTC7, where information on the missing 2.3 Trillion was housed, on the same day.


Yet again, I’m not talking about anything held inside the buildings. That isn’t what I’m concerned with. Just trying to prove that the building was indeed struck by a plane.

quote:


Look, after following these debates for a long time, I don’t think arguments over “dustification” is a discussion that will shed any light on the topic.

Yet on the same token, neither will playing games of “gotcha!”



I wanted him to bring up “dustification” for that reason.
This post was edited on 8/1/21 at 7:01 pm
Posted by allrightX3
Lone Star
Member since Jul 2021
140 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 7:01 pm to
He had no genuine interest in dialogue.

He was here to fortify his firewall and validate his internal comfort.

In a way, I think it's almost better to stay comfy. I can empathize with people who avoid existential crisis. It makes sense to protect our internal comfort.
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38261 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 7:09 pm to
If you can come up with something more worthwhile than saying that nuclear material was detonated under the WTC maybe I’d listen.

Make some actual connections and back it up with proof instead of just repeating the same lines ad nauseam and saying “isn’t that suspicious?”

Yeah all of 9/11 is suspicious, dude. I don’t doubt that some level of the government could’ve been hanged for either being incompetent or maybe even helping execute the attacks.

ETA: our government is corrupt to the core. They don’t give a shite about the people. The Pentagon is used to funnel money into peoples’ pockets all the time. This isn’t news. Eisenhower warned us about it in the 50s.
This post was edited on 8/1/21 at 7:12 pm
Posted by allrightX3
Lone Star
Member since Jul 2021
140 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

If you can come up with something more worthwhile than saying that nuclear material was detonated under the WTC maybe I’d listen.



Laugh.

Like talking about the 2.3 Trillion missing and the correlation between those missing funds and the locations destroyed at the Pentagon and WTC7? You continue to openly show no interest in those verifiable facts.

You are clearly either limited intellectually to the point you can't even notice how dumb you're being or you're just not a good person and enjoy shitting all over a genuine attempt to have discussion.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28505 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

where information on the missing 2.3 Trillion was housed, on the same day.

Your first missing puzzle piece is assuming people wouldve cared about the findings of this money.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
18160 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

It makes sense to protect our internal comfort.



The good news is that after the sh*+-storm that has been unleashed upon the American people over the past year and half, more and more people are coming out of their comfort zone and awakening to the reality that the deeply embedded entities that control all the true levers of power in Washington D.C. are aligned with a bottomless evil.

The bad news is that after suffering through a year of (lab created?) pandemics, forced quarantines, economic lockdowns, orchestrated street riots and stolen elections, it is frightening to contemplate what horrors will be inflicted upon us next.

Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38261 posts
Posted on 8/1/21 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

Like talking about the 2.3 Trillion missing and the correlation between those missing funds and the locations destroyed at the Pentagon and WTC7?


Go ahead and enlighten us


quote:

You are clearly either limited intellectually to the point you can't even notice how dumb you're being or you're just not a good person and enjoy shitting all over a genuine attempt to have discussion


Oh geez. I’m not the one claiming that steel that is falling through dust is steel turning into dust instantly
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram