- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: All we want is for the 6 contested States with election fraud allegations to be...
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:37 pm to WDE24
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:37 pm to WDE24
quote:
They did a hand audit recount to confirm the results.
94% of Fulton County ballots were "adjudicated." The adjudication replaces the original scanned ballot with a "corrected one." Recounting adjudicated ballots is meaningless. To claim otherwise is either stupid or dishonest. A forensic hand count of the original paper ballots would with a fair and honest team to examine each one would establish actual numbers.
The old dem trick for ballot stuffing is to have one of their own switch party and become the "Republican" counter. After that it is stuff, stuff, stuff to the dem's delight.
0
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:43 pm to ApexTiger
Was there only massive fraud in these six states? Everywhere else was just fine?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:43 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
All of them are crap with no substance.
Every state in question changed their voting laws without their legislature. Breaking the constitution.
Isn't that illegal?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 8:03 pm to Tigers0918
How many of the suits you refer to were taken up for evidentiary hearing? How many were denied out of hand with no hearing? I want to know the numbers here, not just your talking point, so put up or shut up.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 8:04 pm to GregoryD
quote:
This is what happens when your mom gets box wine drunk every night of her pregnancy with you. Go look at the judge's rulings
Link it dickbreath.
The SC case.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 8:12 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
heard by a balanced Congressional committee including individuals elected from these states in question.
why? all these allegations have long ago been disproven
truth about voter fraud
Rumor vs Reality
Posted on 1/10/21 at 8:18 pm to thejudge
quote:
Every state in question changed their voting laws without their legislature. Breaking the constitution.
Isn't that illegal?
that is up to those states... so apparently, it isn't.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:27 pm to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:
Trump's lawyers are on record with the courts saying that they were not alleging fraud took place. They made statements about fraud to the public, but when they were in the courtrooms, and the judges point blank asked them if they are alleging fraud, they said no.
I guess his lawyers are part of the deep state??
Yeah when I heard that it got me to scratch my head. Was this actually said by one of Trump’s lawyers of record? Too tired to research.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:29 pm to Otto Scorzany
quote:Yeah, some lawyer named Rudolph said it during a hearing in one of the Pennsylvania cases. He wasn’t the only one.
Was this actually said by one of Trump’s lawyers of record?
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:30 pm to Demshoes
quote:
Was there only massive fraud in these six states? Everywhere else was just fine?
Good question...
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:33 pm to cigsmcgee
quote:
trump even whines about the emmy's being rigged.
Many actors have complained they are...some of them black
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:34 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
All of them are crap with no substance.
You are wasting your time presenting facts to this crowd...they have a conspiratorial answer to everything. Trump lost 54 court cases, with judges across the political spectrum calling the allegations "meritless," "without evidence," and having "no basis in fact or law." He won a single case, that was about a mostly inconsequential matter (from a vote tally standpoint) in PA. So he went 1-54.
Though it is fascinating to see how a significant number of people were so utterly duped by Trump. Then again, Trump goes way back as a con man...he started perfecting his craft in the early 70s in NY.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:37 pm to WDE24
I actually started to tune out the stolen election mantra when I heard something about this. Ok, you alleged fraud to the public, let’s get to a court of law and see it.
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:49 pm to ApexTiger
Get over it already
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:50 pm to TheWalrus
Trump won 49 states including California
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:54 pm to victoire sécurisé
it was a sting against your side
your hero Biden was stung
he never even realized it
your hero Biden was stung
he never even realized it
Posted on 1/10/21 at 10:19 pm to Otto Scorzany
quote:
Judge:“In your petition, which is right before me — and I read it several times — you don’t claim that any electors or the Board of the County were guilty of fraud, correct?” asked the judge. “That’s correct?”
(Lawyer) Goldstein: “Your Honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” Goldstein replied. “And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the DNC or anybody else involved in this a liar.
Judge: “I am asking you a specific question, and I am looking for a specific answer. Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?”
“To my knowledge at present, no,” Goldstein replied.
The judge pressed on. “Are you claiming that there is any undue or improper influence upon the elector with respect to these 592 ballots?”
“To my knowledge at present, no,” Goldstein replied.
This is just one of them. I keep seeing folks on here claiming the cases were thrown out on "technicalities" or bc they didn't have standing. Sure, that's true for some of them, hell there were something like 60 cases tried? But there were also many that went before a judge and the Trump lawyers wouldn't claim fraud because they knew there wasn't any.
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 1/10/21 at 11:02 pm to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:So what are the excuses being used to explain this away? Any of you that are alleging fraud able to give an explanation?
Judge:“In your petition, which is right before me — and I read it several times — you don’t claim that any electors or the Board of the County were guilty of fraud, correct?” asked the judge. “That’s correct?”
(Lawyer) Goldstein: “Your Honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” Goldstein replied. “And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the DNC or anybody else involved in this a liar.
Judge: “I am asking you a specific question, and I am looking for a specific answer. Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?”
“To my knowledge at present, no,” Goldstein replied.
The judge pressed on. “Are you claiming that there is any undue or improper influence upon the elector with respect to these 592 ballots?”
“To my knowledge at present, no,” Goldstein replied.
Posted on 1/11/21 at 12:19 am to ApexTiger
How about law enforcement investigate the alleged election crimes witnesses saw being committed in front of their face?
Posted on 1/11/21 at 12:28 am to Boogalie
My understanding is that almost every suit that was ruled upon were decided on legal technicalities. Standing, laches etc. Thus the actual evidence was never judged at all.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News