- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:10 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
Mueller has said a hundred times that he was not allowed to indict the president
Such a bullshite excuse to hide behind.
That OLC policy is a guideline. Do you really believe that if a sitting President were to gun somebody down in cold blood in the Oval Office in front of witnesses, he wouldn’t be indicted?
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:10 pm to cajunangelle
You guys don't get too moved by all the hundreds of pages of evidence laid out in the Mueller report, because you can just choose to ignore it.
but this "Moscow Mitch" thing.
That's the type of thing that sends a bit of a shiver down the spine, doesn't it?
That's the type of thing that sticks with the masses and you certainly see it as your weapons being turned back at you.
but this "Moscow Mitch" thing.
That's the type of thing that sends a bit of a shiver down the spine, doesn't it?
That's the type of thing that sticks with the masses and you certainly see it as your weapons being turned back at you.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:12 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
Mueller went so far to say that he couldn't exonerate the president, and from that we should be able to take a hint what he meant by that.
It's not a prosecutor's job to exonerate. I'm not surprised you don't know this
quote:
Mueller's testimony that encrypted messages by members of Trump's campaign and lies that were told
You mean where Mueller left out key portions of the Dowd transcript?
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:12 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Such a bullshite excuse to hide behind.
I agree. Trump should have been indicted hands down.
That policy needs to be changed by Congress.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:12 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
You guys don't get too moved by all the hundreds of pages of evidence laid out in the Mueller report, because you can just choose to ignore it.
Stop embarrassing the state.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:14 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:Why are you ignoring my counterpoints to your posts?
PygmalionEffect
Because you aren't here to discuss. You are here to fling your leftwing shite around.
I genuinely feel sorry for people like you. I really hope you seek mental help
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:14 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
That policy needs to be changed by Congress.
You’re missing the point.
If there were rock-solid evidence of a crime committed, he could be indicted, policy or no policy. No one is above the law, remember? There’s nothing for Congress to change.
He didn’t do anything. Deal with it.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:15 pm to L.A.
Of course it would. Senate will vote along party lines. It would be a waste of time.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:16 pm to Bunyan
quote:
It's not a prosecutor's job to exonerate. I'm not surprised you don't know this
Those were Mueller's words trying to explain to the American people why Trump wasn't indicted.
One of the pub congressmen had a problem with it, (yeah I watched the testimony)
Reminded me of another defense where someone said it depended on what your definition of "it" was.
Just lawyer parlor tricks to try to avoid talking about all the evidence that Trump broke the law multiple times and is an illegitimate president.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:17 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
PygmalionEffect
Maybe you’re going for Rex and not Peej with your posts.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:18 pm to PygmalionEffect
The Republicans will uphold their constitutional duty by finding Trump not guilty.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:20 pm to L.A.
Remember when this a-hole was so brave that he would risk prison to release the truth and damn the classification and along with that remember him stating repeatedly that he had "seen the evidence" of Russian collusion, not merely obstruction?
I do.
I do.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:20 pm to Godfather1
quote:
You’re missing the point.
If there were rock-solid evidence of a crime committed, he could be indicted, policy or no policy. No one is above the law, remember? There’s nothing for Congress to change.
He didn’t do anything. Deal with it.
There was rock solid evidence of a crime committed, multiple crimes. Over 900 former federal prosecutors that read the report all agreed that Trump committed obstruction of justice.
Of course you're not going to believe them, you're going with the opinion of alex Jones, Hannity, Limbaugh or some other totally unbiased expert to back up your opinion I guess.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:20 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:what? How?
is an illegitimate president.
Our constitution makes clear that the winner of the majority of electoral college votes is the winner of the presidential election.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:20 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
Trump broke the law multiple times and is an illegitimate president
Link where he's illegitimate. And don't post any Russia collusion nonsense because that has been fully debunked...a fairy tale
Mueller's own Russia indictments even concluded that no Americans were involved and no votes were changed
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:20 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
Mueller went so far to say that he couldn't exonerate the president, and from that we should be able to take a hint what he meant by that.
Exoneration is not possible by any court, DA, or AG. There is no power to exonerate in the entire legal code. That is why it is such a sham for Mueller to say he could not exonerate Trump. He claimed that sentence was included in case Barr did not know he could not exonerate Trump. Tell me what fool believes that?
THERE IS NO POWER TO EXONERATE!
This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:21 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
Over 900 former federal prosecutors that read the report all agreed that Trump committed obstruction of justice.
And please explain how that proves Trump is guilty.
Be detailed
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:22 pm to PygmalionEffect
Posted on 7/28/19 at 5:22 pm to L.A.
No way! He has sworn for over a year that he has the evidence.
What a worthless bunch of frikers in the media.
What a worthless bunch of frikers in the media.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News