Started By
Message

re: ACLU tricked the DOJ, thwarting review of immigrant abortion case

Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11723 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:37 pm to
No it can’t. And if what the government says is true, the ACLU lawyers will be disciplined for lying to kill an unborn baby.
This post was edited on 11/3/17 at 12:39 pm
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21451 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:38 pm to
This thread is fricking disgusting. Its one thing to disagree over abortion, its another to start celebratory trash threads like this.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476736 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

It can be..

how?

to be specific, how can a lawyer lie without being unethical and/or unprofessional?

now, to limit that further, how many of these examples involve misleading the Court itself?
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46862 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:40 pm to
So much work to kill an innocent human life.
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11723 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:41 pm to
The best part about this is that everyone knew the Govt. was seeking a stay. They called the Court itself and explained exactly what was occurring.

The ACLU director is saying they did nothing wrong, but if the LADB had this, those lawyers would be fricked.
Posted by CommoDawg
Member since Jun 2015
2322 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

how? to be specific, how can a lawyer lie without being unethical and/or unprofessional? now, to limit that further, how many of these examples involve misleading the Court itself?


Well actually in this case the ACLU attorney didn't lie to the DOJ, they simply didn't communicate everything to them. Which I believe was not required of them. But I can imagine a situation in which lying to prevent opposing counsel from using delay tactics can further the interest of justice
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45995 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

CommoDawg


I'm actually pro-choice, but you're one sick fricking sack of shite for celebrating this.

Posted by TheXman
Middle America
Member since Feb 2017
2984 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:43 pm to
Send her back!!
Posted by Perfect Circle
S W Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
7904 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:43 pm to
What ever happened to our right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476736 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

The ACLU director is saying they did nothing wrong, but if the LADB had this, those lawyers would be fricked.


100%

i mean it's clearly obvious that they, AT THE LEAST, withheld critical timing information that the UDSOJ needed for the stay

once the ACLU attorney knew the date, they purposefully took steps to have this abortion done prior to that date

that shows clear intent to deceive. that's disbarment-level stuff there, b/c it , in effect, misled the court itself
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122859 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Which I believe was not required of them.


Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Well actually in this case the ACLU attorney didn't lie to the DOJ, they simply didn't communicate everything to them. Which I believe was not required of them.

That is unethical, especially if it involved ex parte communication with the Court.
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11723 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:47 pm to
Yes. They flat out lied. You think the DOJ would be staking it’s reputation on this if they didn’t have the goods?

The DOJ was told that the girl could not get an abortion until Oct. 26. The ACLU told the district court that’s the abortion had to be delayed for a day. As soon as the Govt. announced it was going to seek a stay the following morning, the ACLU rushed to make it happen the next morning.

The govt. makes clear in brief that had the ACLU not deceived them and the court, the govt. would have filed Tuesday night.

Pretty cut and dry.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476736 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

the ACLU attorney didn't lie to the DOJ, they simply didn't communicate everything to them.

um

they changed the date of medical services once the DOJ advised its anticipated date. so the DOJ revealed its hand, as it has to, and the ACLU intentionally deceived the DOJ about the status of its client to avoid a stay. that's severely unethical behavior

Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122859 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:48 pm to
unethical behavior doesn't seem to bother people like OP
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

But I can imagine a situation in which lying to prevent opposing counsel from using delay tactics can further the interest of justice

Further the interest of justice? You basically just said you can imagine it being okay to lie if it serves your preferred end goal, which has nothing to do with justice. Justice is playing by the rules and securing a decision either for or against your end.
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
10376 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

CommoDawg


The baby is dead!!!
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85654 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:50 pm to
That’s closer to sanctionable behavior than it is to brilliant lawyering.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476736 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

The govt. makes clear in brief that had the ACLU not deceived them and the court, the govt. would have filed Tuesday night.

exactly

the ACLU intentionally mislead opposing counsel and the Court itself. that ain't good lawyering, especially when it's not even a legal issue/argument. we're talking about the most basic procedure (dates, scheduling, etc)
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85654 posts
Posted on 11/3/17 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Well actually in this case the ACLU attorney didn't lie to the DOJ, they simply didn't communicate everything to them. Which I believe was not required of them. But I can imagine a situation in which lying to prevent opposing counsel from using delay tactics can further the interest of justice


And in what state are you licensed to practice law?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram