Started By
Message

re: Aborting Down syndrome babies

Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:44 pm to
If more people were honest with themselves, they’d share your opinion. It’s silly how people grandstand on this issue and try to pretend it’s binary and “simple”. It isn’t.
Posted by TigerGM
Member since Nov 2014
1126 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:44 pm to
Not all Down syndrome children are defective. Most are active in communities, work and participate in life as others do. There are very high functioning Down syndrome adults that are fairly independent. They have great quality of life. We shouldn’t be able to choose for them.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116777 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

In China they'll abort a baby for it being female. I think the problem got so bad that China had to prevent gender screening. Not sure if that's still a thing there.


The research I did on this was way back in the 90s so things have probably changed. The big issue then was rural vs. urban. In urban areas the one child policy could be enforced by testing females for pregnancy and doing forced abortion if they already had a child.

In rural areas the family had to have a son to work the land so they just killed the female babies after birth and buried them.

The unintended consequence of the policy was a larger percentage of males in the Chinese population. This caused a huge number of young males who had no prospects for marriage. It increased gang crime.

Japan had a population control program in the 70s and 80s but it was not so coercive. It was PSA's (be a patriot and have only one child) and financial pressure (it's your kid, don't come to us to support it.)
Today, young Japanese women are using dogs as substitutes for children. They are fine with being childless and are going ape shite crazy over dogs. The free market is accommodating them and dog friendly hotels and restaurants are springing up.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:45 pm to
That’s not a valid argument against the position, I hope you realize.
Posted by wartiger2004
9X National Champions WDE RIP CK
Member since Aug 2011
20034 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:45 pm to
Exactly once again it boils down to taking responsibility for ones actions and that means you get someone pregnant raise the kid
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170714 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

The research I did on this was way back in the 90s so things have probably changed. The big issue then was rural vs. urban. In urban areas the one child policy could be enforced by testing females for pregnancy and doing forced abortion if they already had a child.

In rural areas the family had to have a son to work the land so they just killed the female babies after birth and buried them.

The unintended consequence of the policy was a larger percentage of males in the Chinese population. This caused a huge number of young males who had no prospects for marriage. It increased gang crime.

That's pretty much my understanding of it as well

And it lead to a lot of female abductions which is probably the gang crime you're referring to

Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116777 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

If you want to play your little cute semantics game with the topic of genocide by my guest.


It's not cute, it's the facts. I thought you were interested in facts. I guess not.

The difference between the Nazis killing deformed children and Americans CHOOSING to abort a deformed child in the first trimester should be obvious to anyone who is not retarded.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72289 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

more people were honest with themselves, they’d share your opinion. It’s silly how people grandstand on this issue and try to pretend it’s binary and “simple”. It isn’t


It’s human fricking life. Who the frick do you think you are to declare who’s life is worth living and who’s isn’t? What if I decided your life is not worth living and society would be better off if you were dead?
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:47 pm to
Being born with Down Syndrome is a sentence of misery. It's also very expensive on society and I find it ironic that any right-wing person would want to put that burden on society especially considering how much they don't like funding anything relating to healthcare.

Stopping someone from having to live life as a prisoner isnt even remotely close to Hitler creating a master race. I don't even understand how you would conflate the two
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170714 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Not all Down syndrome children are defective. Most are active in communities, work and participate in life as others do. There are very high functioning Down syndrome adults that are fairly independent. They have great quality of life. We shouldn’t be able to choose for them.

Sure

The more interesting topic on the horizon will be genetic modification

In the future it's unlikely that natural birth will be commonplace. If you could guarantee that your child wasn't born with any debilitating afflictions why wouldn't you?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116777 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Who the frick do you think you are to declare who’s life is worth living and who’s isn’t?


According to US law the answer to your question is:
The Mother.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:49 pm to
The fact is the vast majority of parents just do not want to have a retarded baby. In the US over 90% of them are aborted and the US is a mostly Christian nation. It’s sad.
Posted by Brazos
Member since Oct 2013
20557 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:52 pm to
Holy shite you people are cruel and twisted.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
23055 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:53 pm to
Why should you be surprised? We abort children for convenience. What could possibly be more inconvenient than say a Down’s syndrome baby

:smh:
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170714 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

In the US over 90% of them are aborted

link?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138153 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

You’re not the first to use this argument. Mr. Gobbles thought the same thing.


Jesus, dude. There's really no need for that.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

The fact is the vast majority of parents just do not want to have a retarded baby. In the US over 90% of them are aborted and the US is a mostly Christian nation. It’s sad.


I think it would be more sad for you to condemn a person to live a life where they can't even feed themselves
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:57 pm to
It’s no use trying to have a conversation with people like that. Only capable of arguing from emotion and shaming people who don’t have the same view.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Holy shite you people are cruel and twisted.


Cruel and twisted enough to make a person live life with downs? I don't think you're getting this
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78173 posts
Posted on 3/18/18 at 12:57 pm to
The mainstream, evil Left folks.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram