- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A small measure of trust restored in our judicial system
Posted on 6/17/21 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 6/17/21 at 12:54 pm
Supreme Court sides with Catholic foster agency that excludes same-sex couples in 9-0 ruling.
Even the shitty liberal activist and lukewarm milquetoast "conservatives" couldn't disagree on this one.
I almost can't believe this happened. Seems to be very out of touch with the rest of politics these days.
I am grateful that the Honorable and Venerable Antonin Scalia did not have to sit through this one. You know he would have torn some asses apart on this one.
LINK
Really terrible shite that the City of Philadelphia tried to do here by excluding Catholic relief from helping with foster children.
God cannot be happy with these people.
God forgive this country.
Even the shitty liberal activist and lukewarm milquetoast "conservatives" couldn't disagree on this one.
I almost can't believe this happened. Seems to be very out of touch with the rest of politics these days.
I am grateful that the Honorable and Venerable Antonin Scalia did not have to sit through this one. You know he would have torn some asses apart on this one.
LINK
Really terrible shite that the City of Philadelphia tried to do here by excluding Catholic relief from helping with foster children.
God cannot be happy with these people.
God forgive this country.
This post was edited on 6/17/21 at 1:00 pm
3
Posted on 6/17/21 at 12:58 pm to Rogelio
Looking at this 9-0 decision and the decision to dismiss the Odumbf*ckCare decision on a bullsh!t standing issue (if the states don't have standing then who the f*ck does?), I get the bad feeling that there is A LOT of dealmaking going on behind the scenes at the Supreme Court. THAT is not how our judiciary is suppose to work.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 12:59 pm to MMauler
I really hope you're wrong but something tells me sadly this is more right than wrong.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:00 pm to MMauler
quote:
I get the bad feeling that there is A LOT of dealmaking going on behind the scenes at the Supreme Court. THAT is not how our judiciary is suppose to work.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:01 pm to MMauler
The desire to protect his DC perception seems to be the only actual "principle" Roberts possesses.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:03 pm to Rogelio
They need to do something about divorces favoring women.
Dads should get presumption in custody battles for the boy. If my parents had divorced and my dad got me I'd be the same as I am today.
If mom got me I'd be a total lunatic today.
Dads should get presumption in custody battles for the boy. If my parents had divorced and my dad got me I'd be the same as I am today.
If mom got me I'd be a total lunatic today.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:04 pm to Rogelio
Did you read the majority opinion? It basically hinged on a provision in the city's contract that allows the city to override certain agency determinations. SCOTUS ruled that such a provision made the nondiscrimination policy in the contract no longer neutral or general and thus didn't meet strict scrutiny.
Basically, the city can change a single override provision in the contract and move forward with excluding the Catholic foster agency, CSS, from future contracts.
This isn't some big win for religious liberty.
Basically, the city can change a single override provision in the contract and move forward with excluding the Catholic foster agency, CSS, from future contracts.
This isn't some big win for religious liberty.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:05 pm to Zach
quote:so moms should get it for the girls????
Dads should get presumption in custody battles for the boy.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:08 pm to chalmetteowl
Well, I would say the parent who is most capable of taking care of them should retain custody. It need not always be the woman.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:08 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
so moms should get it for the girls????
Yes.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:10 pm to Rogelio
quote:
I would say the parent who is most capable of taking care of them should retain custody.
The word is 'presumptive'. It means tie goes to dad for boys. The mom would have to prove dad is a total jackass. Right now dad has to prove mom is a drug addicted whore.
Posted on 6/17/21 at 1:15 pm to TideCPA
quote:
Did you read the majority opinion? It basically hinged on a provision in the city's contract that allows the city to override certain agency determinations. SCOTUS ruled that such a provision made the nondiscrimination policy in the contract no longer neutral or general and thus didn't meet strict scrutiny.
That makes a lot more sense.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News