- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3/24/25 1:30PM *LIVE Oral Arguments Judges Henderson, Millett, Walker-Tren de Aragua
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:51 pm to bleedpg
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:51 pm to bleedpg
ICE determines in what appears to be a border State. (Texas) 5 were removed from the plane. The female judge IMO wrongly claimed the others were not able to appeal.
IN NEWS ONLY I READ: Some with the gang tats were trying to lie and said they had the tats to be safe and were not horrid gang members...
Now we are on why was it brought to a very leftist DC court. <---my words
The ACLU lawyer at least has a brain. IMO that female Judge was a mess.
IN NEWS ONLY I READ: Some with the gang tats were trying to lie and said they had the tats to be safe and were not horrid gang members...
Now we are on why was it brought to a very leftist DC court. <---my words
The ACLU lawyer at least has a brain. IMO that female Judge was a mess.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:56 pm to cajunangelle
Right.
They had the same amount of time as those 5.
They had the same amount of time as those 5.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:58 pm to cajunangelle
cajunangelle:
Thanks.
What a mess. I believe the judge is changing the original ruling by the first Judge to state that it's all about whether they are a part of the gang or not right?
I believe this has to go before the U.S. supreme court.
Thanks.
What a mess. I believe the judge is changing the original ruling by the first Judge to state that it's all about whether they are a part of the gang or not right?
I believe this has to go before the U.S. supreme court.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 1:58 pm to Jjdoc
Lol... wait.. did the ACLU attorney say that a TRO is not be appealed.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:01 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The ACLU lawyer at least has a brain. IMO that female Judge was a mess.
It all sounds like it's over my head but the ACLU lawyer is not advocating for the gang members to come back correct?
Full disclosure. I stopped listening a little after the ACLU lawyer started talking because I have to get back to work.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:02 pm to Jjdoc
First female judge.... vote against gov.
Second judge male.... vote for the gov.
That leaves the last female judge.
Second judge male.... vote for the gov.
That leaves the last female judge.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:03 pm to Jjdoc
Our people? These are not “our people”.
Hence…deportation.
frick the ACLU.
Hence…deportation.
frick the ACLU.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:03 pm to Jjdoc
Lol... he won't answer why they went to DC and not where they are being held.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:03 pm to TigerNAtux
So the final decision comes from the Bush appointee?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:05 pm to cajunangelle
If I'm not mistaken, didn't Millet bring up the fact that these gang members were denied Habeas Corpus, but that they didn't ask for a review? Who's fault is that? These assholes were certainly schooled on how to play the system by NGA's
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:09 pm to Jjdoc
Now arguing that the case should not be in appeals.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:11 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
all over the place and confusing
quote:
female
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:14 pm to Meauxjeaux
Sir you get 5 minutes.... but I'm going to talk instead
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:20 pm to Jjdoc
I do believe the President said on national tv (and the AG) to deport yourself back to where you came from or we will hunt you down and send you back.
That was notice.
That was notice.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:21 pm to TigerNAtux
So this whole thing should’ve been avoided on standing, like 2020 cases?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:23 pm to Meauxjeaux
Can someone explain this to me like I'm 5?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 2:23 pm to Meauxjeaux
She is currently him hawing. And hey now
she is a democrat- but she is a judge. but she just giggled and sounds plain dumb arguing strictly partisan.
Popular
Back to top



4







