- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2nd release of UFO's out today.....
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:41 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:41 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
For things like the pyramids or the Barabar Caves, thet actually do have multiple independent lines of evidence: surviving tool marks, unfinished quarries, experimental archaeology, worker settlements, and comparable techniques still used in traditional stoneworking
1
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:41 pm to AlterEd
This is a nonsensical response. Youre flailing.
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:42 pm to Jake88
quote:
For things like the pyramids or the Barabar Caves
Yet no written record of their construction, contrary to what you tried to claim.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:47 pm to AlterEd
quote:I dodnt say there were ancient written records of their construction, many ancients didn't do that regularly as I posted earlier. I said we know now how they were created based upon evidence at the site.
Yet no written record of their construction, contrary to what you tried to claim
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:54 pm to Jake88
quote:
I said we know now how they were created based upon evidence at the site
Here is what you actually said.
quote:
They do know how they were created. There are texts that discuss it.
And it is not true. There are no texts discussing their construction. What you have is a wholly retarded hypothesis that relies on them essentially sanding granite into perfect symmetry by hand. It is ridiculous in every way.
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:55 pm to AlterEd
Modern texts, as in textbooks.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:56 pm to Jake88
quote:
Modern texts, as in textbooks.
What you said is incorrect and changing it to say "textbooks" doesn't make the hypothesis any less retarded.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:56 pm to AlterEd
And it is not perfect. There are gouge marks in the Barbarar Caves, especially in the Lomas Rishi cave.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:58 pm to Jake88
quote:
And it is not perfect.
Repeating a lie doesn't make it magically true.
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:02 pm to AlterEd
You posted that already. What's the source of the summary of AGP/Art's study? I see Instagram at the end of that sentence.
Here is Lomas Rishi, several imperfections can be seen..the arch is not as round onnthe right as it transitions from vertical. The blocks under the arch more on the foreground are not equally spaced or sized.
Here is Lomas Rishi, several imperfections can be seen..the arch is not as round onnthe right as it transitions from vertical. The blocks under the arch more on the foreground are not equally spaced or sized.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:02 pm to Jake88
quote:
I saw imperfection.
Think about what you’re saying.
People like you desperately stare at a granite arch and floor that was almost perfectly cut and polished, or a granite vase that was so precisely cut you can shine a flashlight through it, and write it off as nothing.
Even though they were done thousands of years ago supposedly using rudimentary hand tools.
Could we do the same thing today, the same way, to the same precision?
No, a carpenter framing your 4’x8” half bathroom can’t even square in the room properly.
It’s clear they (and those at other ancient sites younger and older) had knowledge and technology far ahead of their time, then somehow that technology was lost to history.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:14 pm to riverdiver
quote:
Think about what you’re saying.
The guy is an imbecile. Now he's looking at perceived imperfections that are more than likely illusions due to lighting/shadows and eyeballing it in to try and discredit frickin laser scans.
At the end of the day, every single picture I have shown displays technological capabilities far in advance of what his "textbooks" would have you believe these people possessed. And it's obvious if given the tiniest amount of thought.
In Egypt there are found over 1,500 of these statues of Ramses of varying sizes. And they all possess the exact same proportions. Perfectly symmetrical. Supposedly carved with copper chisels into granite and then also polished to a mirror finish.
There has to be some sort of cognitive dissonance going on here because once you actually consider what they're trying to tell you was the official cause of all of this monumental stonework, even granting their retarded hypotheses, you quickly realize that there aren't enough laborers to cut all these stones. Copper tools, even using sand as an abrasive, cuts through granite at a rate of something ridiculously slow like 4 millimeters per hour. And they cut millions of enormous granite blocks.
Their stupid theories make absolutely zero practical sense at all.
The symmetrically perfect Ramses statues cut from granite, supposedly by hand, with copper tools.
: 
Here is a good video explaining the symmetry in an undeniable way. Take a picture of it, cut it in half, take one side, reverse it, and it matches what you actually see. It's perfect.
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:15 pm to riverdiver
quote:I didn't write it off as nothing. I wrote it off as not a sign of some advanced tech.
and write it off as nothing
quote:Probably, yes.
Could we do the same thing today, the same way, to the same precision?
quote:They dont have years to build my house, they have weeks and don't care about precision.
No, a carpenter framing your 4’x8” half bathroom can’t even square in the room properly.
quote:No, its not at all.
It’s clear they (and those at other ancient sites younger and older) had knowledge and technology far ahead of their time, then somehow that technology was lost to history
quote:
Highly skilled artisans today (and historically in a few traditions) can make pottery around ~1 mm thick that is remarkably uniform and visually “perfect,” but it’s extremely difficult.
Used historically in places like Jingdezhen
Produces some of the finest “eggshell porcelain” known
Real-world precedent: “eggshell porcelain”
There are historical and modern ceramics that reach ~0.5–1 mm thickness.
These pieces are:
translucent when held to light
The main places it happens are:
1) Jingdezhen, China (the global center of fine porcelain)
Jingdezhen is the most famous modern hub for this kind of work.
Here you’ll still find:
“eggshell porcelain” specialists (sometimes called dan tai ci)
cups and bowls so thin they glow when held to light
highly trained throwers and slip-casters working in family workshops or state-supported studios
This post was edited on 5/22/26 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:19 pm to AlterEd
quote:Show me the original laser scan study not a summary by some goofy site.
to try and discredit frickin laser scans
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:22 pm to Pragmatist2025
Exactly, the chit got real really fast after that. For our part we never laughed so much. On the other friends part I have never seen anyone throw someone out the door and use anything remotely close to a liquid, shampoo, shaving cream, beer, water, soap and whatever else was in that room to scrub himself. Our laughing brought a promise to kick our arses if word got out, as he 6’-5” and framed as linebacker we agreed. But it was funny as chit then and looking back
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:35 pm to Jake88
quote:
Highly skilled artisans today (and historically in a few traditions) can make pottery around ~1 mm thick that is remarkably uniform and visually “perfect,” but it’s extremely difficult. Used historically in places like Jingdezhen Produces some of the finest “eggshell porcelain” known Real-world precedent: “eggshell porcelain” There are historical and modern ceramics that reach ~0.5–1 mm thickness. These pieces are: translucent when held to light The main places it happens are: 1) Jingdezhen, China (the global center of fine porcelain) Jingdezhen is the most famous modern hub for this kind of work. Here you’ll still find: “eggshell porcelain” specialists (sometimes called dan tai ci) cups and bowls so thin they glow when held to light highly trained throwers and slip-casters working in family workshops or state-supported studios
I’m talking about vases cut out of a piece of granite, polished, and cut thin enough you can shine a flashlight through the granite.
You’re talking about clay and ceramics.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:39 pm to WAR TIGER
I’m so glad he’s getting the important things done. This is fascinating!
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:39 pm to riverdiver
quote:
I’m talking about vases cut out of a piece of granite, polished, and cut thin enough you can shine a flashlight through the granite.
Those vases zero out metrologist tools as well. Again, perfect symmetry. Something like that would require some sort of diamond tipped multi-axial cnc lathe to reproduce today.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 9:54 pm to riverdiver
quote:
1. “Semi-translucent granite” is basically a red flag
Granite is an interlocking crystalline rock (quartz + feldspar + mica). Even when highly polished:
It is not translucent
It cannot be milled thin enough to become “semi-transparent” in any meaningful sense
If something looks translucent, it is almost certainly:
Alabaster (calcite) ? naturally translucent when thin
Or another fine-grained stone, not granite
2. “Millimeter-thin granite vases” are not known in the archaeological record
There are no verified museum or excavation reports of granite vessels that are uniformly milled to ~1 mm thickness.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News