Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

23 House Republicans suspect DOJ Cover-up in Progress? – Request “Prompt” Declassification

Posted on 6/16/19 at 9:19 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146956 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 9:19 am
quote:

Twenty-three House republicans request declassification of documents directly from President Trump as soon as possible. Despite the executive office directive to AG Bill Barr, the republican group seemingly do not trust the DOJ and FBI institutional interests.

It’s a smart move to keep the pressure on.



Two weeks ago Judiciary Committee member John Ratcliffe outlined his view of U.S. Attorney John Durham as a benefactor of the declassification insofar as Durham could gain information for his “review”.

Rep. Ratcliffe noted Durham was essentially a ‘special counsel’ and could use access to documents as a tool toward a grand jury review [ergo DOJ declassification would be needed]. However, along with noting a possibility of John Durham’s intent, Ratcliffe was direct in tempering expectations of any upcoming public declassification.

The possibility of Durham exploiting/using documents declassified by his boss, AG Bill Barr, could suggest some of the material may not be made public; indeed that’s the inference from Ratcliffe two weeks ago as he outlined to Maria Bartiromo.

If accurate, it is worthwhile considering what *could be* publicly declassified by AG Barr, and yet not run afoul of any investigative value for Durham. Example: the declassification of the Rosenstein scope memos to Robert Mueller (no longer a reason to be hidden) would not seem to materially affect the investigative intents of Durham.

So considering investigative value, what documents could be purposefully made public that would not impede Durham?

Continue reading:
quote:


LINK


This post was edited on 6/16/19 at 10:30 am
Posted by CoachMoorGut
Member since Sep 2018
725 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 9:34 am to
Mo Brooks doing work!
Posted by TOPAL
Member since Mar 2010
4532 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 9:45 am to
FBI/ CIA will cover their arse... getting nervous about Barr. Huber/Horowitz are career govt lawyers. The deep state is still in power. Trump needs to go solo.
This post was edited on 6/16/19 at 10:18 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146956 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 10:24 am to
How can you investigate the investigators when they want to cover-up-- under the guise of protecting the institutions? We can only hope and pray Durham is not influenced by the swamp.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146956 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 10:27 am to
fixed Mo Brooks link

LINK
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35412 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 10:29 am to
So Barr is Deep State now?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146956 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 10:43 am to
Wray sure seems to contradict Barr.

Wray says there is no evidence the agency spied on Trump’s 2016 campaign

Barr says ‘I think spying did occur’ against Trump campaign

Do you believe Barr or Wray? Being that it is out even in the news that Trump was indeed spied on. How can Wray justify his statement?
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23727 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 11:23 am to
Wray has one of the most slappable faces I ever saw. For that alone he needs a pink slip IMO.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24829 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 12:19 pm to
I'm glad these (R)'s put their name on this.

We know who deserves reelection when the time comes.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21640 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 12:36 pm to
I don't think they want it released because the dirty laundry is so dirty the public will be disgusted and insist that they be reorganized and put under more control and that's the last thing the FBI, DOJ and all of these huge government entities want.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30049 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Do you believe Barr or Wray? Being that it is out even in the news that Trump was indeed spied on. How can Wray justify his statement?


he is playing word games, investigate in secret is not spying its investigating which he says is their jobs.

its the old clinton defense of it depends on what each persons definition of the word is is



Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35412 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Wray sure seems to contradict Barr.

Wray says there is no evidence the agency spied on Trump’s 2016 campaign

Barr says ‘I think spying did occur’ against Trump campaign

Do you believe Barr or Wray? Being that it is out even in the news that Trump was indeed spied on. How can Wray justify his statement?


That's one hell of a deflection from a very simple question. Is Barr Deep State now?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35412 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

he is playing word games, investigate in secret is not spying its investigating which he says is their jobs.
The Trump Campaign was investigated. If you insist on calling it spying then go ahead even though you are wrong.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16746 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

That's one hell of a deflection from a very simple question. Is Barr Deep State now?


Depends on how Barr proceeds. If he’s hell bent on protecting the reputation of the DOJ, he will deal with the corruption behind the scenes. That would be a deep state response imo. He’s talked a good game so far. We’ll see.

I hope he exposes it all and prosecutes crimes. That’s what we need.
This post was edited on 6/16/19 at 3:22 pm
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30049 posts
Posted on 6/16/19 at 3:45 pm to
The Trump Campaign was spied upon. If you insist on calling it investigating then go ahead even though you are wrong.


unlike you and the rest of the dimms, i dont lie about truths
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146956 posts
Posted on 6/17/19 at 5:53 pm to
Paging boosie, boosie come in. Lawfare blog is purely partisan nimwits. AKA Comey's BFF's.

Posted by lsursb
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
11623 posts
Posted on 6/17/19 at 6:02 pm to
They let Steve King sign it, so it will automatically be dismissed as racist.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram