- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/13/22 at 11:49 am to jclem11
quote:Righteous anger is as close as I get to "staying mad" - that's actually the Left's domain, and probably their only only advantage, seeing as primal, childish emotion can rally lots of other low thinkers and still get stuff done, however illegal, immoral, or unethical.
The film made huge claims that it did not back up. There was likely some frickery in the election but the film did not live up to the hype.
You bring your best evidence forward if you have the goods. The film did not deliver but it did deliver red meat to the true believers but did nothing to convince anyone outside of hardcore MAGAtards.
You can stay mad but that is reality.
That said, the purpose of the film was not, nor ever claimed to be, lifting the curtain on the entire operation, which would be impossible or close to it. What it DID seek to do was to provide some evidence (it did), revive interest in the topic (it did), and give others some insight into how to continue their own investigations (it did).
So for someone like you to act like it was a failure because it fails to miss some goal you set that moves when you need it to, and then to act like we're the ones having trouble coping with reality... like I said: irony.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 11:58 am to VolcanicTiger
Keeping coping but nothing will come of this just like the Kraken.
This film is simply red meat confirmation for the true believers but will do nothing to convince skeptics or the suburban wine moms. That is just reality.
This film is simply red meat confirmation for the true believers but will do nothing to convince skeptics or the suburban wine moms. That is just reality.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:06 pm to jclem11
quote:That's a meaningless taunt and logically inconsistent. Nothing needs to "come of this" to make it valid and honest, and thereby make you wrong. That is already a done deal, which is why you are left with this weak tap-dancing routine.
Keeping coping but nothing will come of this just like the Kraken.
quote:
This film is simply red meat confirmation for the true believers but will do nothing to convince skeptics or the suburban wine moms. That is just reality.
There are skeptics, and then there are "skeptics". An honest skeptic will analyze it objectively; a "skeptic" like you has the opinion he wants and doesn't accept facts he doesn't want to believe and fully believes he's being intellectually honest with himself and others because he lacks the requisite intellect to make the distinction.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:11 pm to VolcanicTiger
quote:
That's a meaningless taunt and logically inconsistent. Nothing needs to "come of this" to make it valid and honest, and thereby make you wrong. That is already a done deal, which is why you are left with this weak tap-dancing routine.
Why are all of The Big Steal(TM) folks such pussies when they get in front of a court?
There has been a ton of huge claims made but it's always drip drip, trust the plan, we will reveal the goods next Thursday excuses.
If you have the evidence, you show your evidence. There has been nothing but vague speculation and just insane claims with specious evidence.
Even Dennis Prager was seeing through this bullshite. lmao.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:16 pm to jclem11
quote:Name one instance of this?
Why are all of The Big Steal(TM) folks such pussies when they get in front of a court?
quote:
There has been a ton of huge claims made but it's always drip drip, trust the plan, we will reveal the goods next Thursday excuses.
Sidney Powell and Lin Wood do not speak for the 100,000,000+ who know the election was stolen.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:18 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
They don't have to meet you bizarre standard of evidence, loser. How is a movie supposed to download a petabyte of raw cell phone geo-tracking data and digital video metadata into your brain, you twit? They presented a summary of their case to the public, in documentary form, then turned over their evidence to the authorities in the states in question. This isnt a jury trial. Specifically in Georgia, election officials have already subpoenaed TTV's data and is launching an investigation. The standard for cause that the rest of non-psychotic liberal society follows has already been met.
You are a 12 year old girl aren’t you?
“They presented a summary of their case”
So they created a 1.5 hour documentary to NOT show us one good example of their case but to allude to things they had in this petabyte of data so we would be interested in more?
Did they Once show you cell phone path of one these 2000 mules with any video evidence they went to multiple drop boxes and/or voting organizations?
One time..did they do this?
Yes or no?
Without the paths that show a person going to multiple boxes (they say they have) or voting orgs (they say they identified) backed by their video (they say they have) they are simple showing a potentially legal act and wanting you to assume it is illegal because they added ominous music and said so.
Fwiw..even if a person did drop off multiple ballots that they weren’t allowed by law (gave you all the ways people can in GA drop multiple ballots) those ballots don’t get disqualified unless they themselves aren’t valid.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:21 pm to VolcanicTiger
quote:
Sidney Powell and Lin Wood do not speak for the 100,000,000+ who know the election was stolen.
How do you know the election was stolen?
This post was edited on 5/13/22 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:22 pm to RealDawg
quote:
Did they Once show you cell phone path of one these 2000 mules with any video evidence they went to multiple drop boxes and/or voting organizations?
Thats a good point, but…..
They did mention they tried to get video for some drop boxes but got denied due to some weird reason OR there wasnt video of a drop box period, which was against the law in of itself.
This would put a dent into being able to do that piece in the movie without having that video available to them……
This post was edited on 5/13/22 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:28 pm to jclem11
quote:
Keeping coping but nothing will come of this
I’m not sure how this squares with your idea that there was some shenanigans in the election.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:31 pm to jclem11
quote:
How do you know the election was stolen?
No one knows that.
But we don’t know a lot of things conclusively. We don’t know the mechanism of action for Ambien. We don’t know how life began. We don’t know the 2020 election was stolen.
Based upon the preponderance of evidence, there is a lot to suggest that the infusion of outside cash and targeted assistance in swing areas within swing states, along with greatly reduced rigor in voter regulations (including illegal procedures, practices and allowances) led to massive changes in what the vote would have been were it not for these things.
That’s inescapable. No one who has a brain refutes any of that. Let’s see where you end up. Brain or no?
Posted on 5/13/22 at 12:51 pm to jclem11
quote:Do you feel you know it wasn't stolen?
How do you know the election was stolen?
Now let's stipulate to the fact that we both believe it was stolen/not stolen and proceed:
Your evidence: how untrustworthy people (politicians and the MSM) reacted and explained it to you and gave you the reassurance you sought, so effectively confirmation bias.
My evidence: People in both parties that would do ANYTHING to get rid of Trump because he's an outsider. People who gave us the Russia hoax, the "Fine People" hoax, the "drink bleach" hoax, etc. Add to that the single most powerful position in the world, guarded by illegally changed voting rules, mail-in ballots (highly insecure), ballot drop boxes (highly insecure), and the typical Democrat machinery - getting nursing home residents, the homeless, the non-English speaking - to get fake votes. Then add to that the censorship (for the public good? Sure boss), the distributed script that this was "the most secure election in the history of humanity" (patently false), the statistical anomalies, the "busted water pipe" that wasn't, the blocked election observer windows, etc.
My evidence is MUCH greater, so as much as you "know" you are right, I "know" you are wrong by a factor of 20.
This post was edited on 5/13/22 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 5/13/22 at 1:02 pm to VolcanicTiger
Anyone with common sense has to question how an old man who was a failure as a Senator and Vice President and who campaigned from his basement got the most votes in presidential history. And why the votes from the districts needed to put him over the top all experienced similar, rare circumstances on election day.
This post was edited on 5/13/22 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 5/13/22 at 1:12 pm to VolcanicTiger
quote:
Do you feel you know it wasn't stolen?
I am not talking about feelings or the hundreds of different things from state to state Dems did to make things go their way.
I am talking this production and was presented as versus what it actually did. That’s all.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 1:17 pm to RealDawg
quote:
I am talking this production and was presented as versus what it actually did. That’s all.
If something has to be comprehensive or GTFO then that's a ridiculous standard.
If they have to name names that they may not have, which may be unethical and/or actionable to appease the unappeasable standards you've decided are convenient at this particular moment in time, then your opinions just aren't very good.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 3:24 pm to VolcanicTiger
The only evidence i needed was 98% of the MSM sounding like a choir echoing the same chorus that this was the "most secure election in history" They were regurgitating this non-stop in less then 24-36 hours of the election with no evidence.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 4:06 pm to Wolfhound45
In the video, D'souza references the Carpenter Supreme Court case and includes a suggestion that Geotracking can provide a "precise location".
He neglects to quote the operative language from the 2018 Carpenter case. The Carpenter Court said:
Carpenter Opinion, see page 15.
He neglects to quote the operative language from the 2018 Carpenter case. The Carpenter Court said:
quote:
As the number of cell sites has proliferated, the geographic area covered by each cell sector has shrunk, particularly in urban areas. In addition, with new technology measuring the time and angle of signals hitting their towers, wireless carriers already have the capability to pinpoint a phone’s location within 50 meters.
Carpenter Opinion, see page 15.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 4:17 pm to texridder
In case y’all wanna zoom in
Posted on 5/13/22 at 4:24 pm to VolcanicTiger
quote:
If something has to be comprehensive or GTFO
I wouldn’t call them giving a singular example comprehensive. Spent half the movie on the phone stuff and never tied it to anything we could see…it was a movie.
You accept what they handed you and that’s ok because you know cheating happened.
I also know it happened but know they didn’t actual show what they said they would- any actual geotracking tied to video evidence. I can’t come up with any good answer as to why they didn’t IF they have what they say.
Also their #ripchord as they called it- releasing all the data..hasn’t happened.
Posted on 5/13/22 at 6:19 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Is this going to turn into 19 pages of you being a collusion truther while simultaneously denying you are a collusion truther?
Why don't you post an example of when I did that?
Of course, you won't do that. You just make these stupid-arse statements to imply they are true.
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News