- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2 km deep cylindrical shock pillars found below pyramids
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:10 pm to TyOconner
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:10 pm to TyOconner
Enough people and time, with basic tools. Hasn’t the feasibility been shown several times? None replicated exact results at scale, but that’s more a matter of not taking 50 years to prove something when a reasonably representative smaller sample does the job.
0
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:11 pm to TyOconner
quote:
I would be willing to be you can’t explain how the pyramids were built. Why then would it be so crazy that something else you can’t explain is attached to them?
Jeez, I can't even explain how the Superdome was built. Does that explain the cemetery underneath it?
Hmmmm...
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:11 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Simply put, human beings of that time, did not have the ability to go build infrastructure TWO MILES below the Earth's surface.
It's 2 km, not two miles. It's a tad under a mile-and-a-quarter - a little over 6,500 feet. But back to your statement that humans of that time did not have the ability to build two [kilometers] underground... By all reckoning, they didn't have the ability to build those structure out of cut and shaped rocks that weighed over 20 tons each, yet the evidence is standing right there staring all our sophisticated, modern homo sapiens sapiens right there in the face and essentially tea-bagging our whole species.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:21 pm to Harry Boutte
Someone knows how the superdome was built. No one knows how the pyramids were built.
To those saying they rolled blocks, that has been debunked over and over. I know that was the leading theory for a long time so it’s easy to latch onto but engineers have tried to replicate that process numerous times and no one has bern able to do it.
I know it’s difficult to believe that whoever built the pyramids had technology that we don’t but everything points to that being true. Does that mean they were more technologically advanced than we are today? Maybe. It could also mean that they had one trick up their sleeves that would seem obvious to us if they told us but we haven’t found that one for whatever reason.
To those saying they rolled blocks, that has been debunked over and over. I know that was the leading theory for a long time so it’s easy to latch onto but engineers have tried to replicate that process numerous times and no one has bern able to do it.
I know it’s difficult to believe that whoever built the pyramids had technology that we don’t but everything points to that being true. Does that mean they were more technologically advanced than we are today? Maybe. It could also mean that they had one trick up their sleeves that would seem obvious to us if they told us but we haven’t found that one for whatever reason.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:22 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
I don't see anyone signing off on a vertical excavation 2KM deep below the heaviest constructed structures on earth.
Maybe it was built before the pyramids. And the pyramids are a marker for where they are?
This seems like it should be a TPA thread…
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:26 pm to Kjnstkmn
The pyramids are fascinating but this has bullshite written all over it.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:30 pm to TyOconner
quote:
I know it’s difficult to believe that whoever built the pyramids had technology that we don’t but everything points to that being true. Does that mean they were more technologically advanced than we are today? Maybe. It could also mean that they had one trick up their sleeves that would seem obvious to us if they told us but we haven’t found that one for whatever reason.
Pretty much this.
For another example, look up Roman concrete.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:31 pm to Bard
How did they get those granite stones to fit so precise?
Puma Punku and Gobekli Tepi as well.
Amazing structures.
Paging TPA.
Puma Punku and Gobekli Tepi as well.
Amazing structures.
Paging TPA.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:32 pm to Ag Zwin
Greek fire, Damascus steel, etc.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:33 pm to TyOconner
quote:
The old idea that they were built 3-6,000 years ago has been thoroughly debunked.
No it hasn't.
quote:
The main theory now is that the Egyptians didn’t build the pyramids, a civilization before them did and then the Egyptians formed a city around them.
Lol. No it isn't.
You know, there has been organic matter found between stones of other periods that date them? Yep. 3 to 5 thousand years ago.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:35 pm to Kjnstkmn
Big Geology homos will be disappoint in this thread.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:36 pm to GumboPot
My mind is open to except the possibility that the human race was far more advanced than we are now many years ago and was wiped out for some reason. The survivors would have had to start over and the knowledge would eventually be lost or watered down for the most part.
There are people throughout history and today who possess gifts of intelligence, abilities to create music and art and such much more advanced than the rest of us. These abilities would have been passed down through generations through genetics.
The possibility of the pyramids being much older than thought and being a source of electrical power is not out of the realm of possibility.
That’s all I’ve got to say about that other than having alex jones presenting anything discredits it immediately.
There are people throughout history and today who possess gifts of intelligence, abilities to create music and art and such much more advanced than the rest of us. These abilities would have been passed down through generations through genetics.
The possibility of the pyramids being much older than thought and being a source of electrical power is not out of the realm of possibility.
That’s all I’ve got to say about that other than having alex jones presenting anything discredits it immediately.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:36 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
Roman concrete.
I’m not an expert in concrete but it’s probably the use of volcanic ash compared to ash from coal
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Damascus steel
We know who and how Damascus steel was made.
No need to recreate it. We have large varieties of steel that are significantly better. By magnitudes.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:39 pm to BayouBlitz
We also have written history of the area.
Now, I know the common default response from the alternative history crowd is to claim all that evidence is fake/fabricated, but we also have written history from OTHER civilizations.
The Bronze Age Collapse was around 3k years ago.
We also know that Nanni around 1,000 years prior to that was very upset with the quality of copper from Ea-nasir
Now, I know the common default response from the alternative history crowd is to claim all that evidence is fake/fabricated, but we also have written history from OTHER civilizations.
The Bronze Age Collapse was around 3k years ago.
We also know that Nanni around 1,000 years prior to that was very upset with the quality of copper from Ea-nasir
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:48 pm to Kjnstkmn
I'm struggling first to grasp how the Egyptian gov could 1. allow this study to happen and 2. allow the information to be released.
Towing the official Egyptian claims that scoff at even a far older date of the Pyramids & Sphynx is something to which they fiercely adhere. The mere claim of a 'secret vault' under the Sphynx is itself loudly and vehemently rejected by conventional Egyptologists.
But this????
Towing the official Egyptian claims that scoff at even a far older date of the Pyramids & Sphynx is something to which they fiercely adhere. The mere claim of a 'secret vault' under the Sphynx is itself loudly and vehemently rejected by conventional Egyptologists.
But this????
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:50 pm to TyOconner
quote:
I know it’s difficult to believe that whoever built the pyramids had technology that we don’t but everything points to that being true.
Meh.
The pyramids were built sometime around 4,500 and 4,600 years ago. Since that time there have been numerous "dark ages" when civilizations declined and previous technology was lost, notably around the "First Intermediate Period" between the Old Kingdom and the Middle Kingdom of Egypt. During the Dark Ages between the fall o0\f the Roman Empire and the Renaissance, much Roman technology was lost. Hell, I don't even believe they still know how to make Damascus steel.
There's no guarantee that humans will always advance technology.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:50 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
I'm struggling first to grasp how the Egyptian gov could 1. allow this study to happen and 2. allow the information to be released.
quote:
But this????
bullshite via extremely faulty methodology.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:51 pm to BayouBlitz
What you’re seeing is the old guard of archaeology cloning onto the old theory. All of the recent evidence suggest the pyramids are much older than previously thought. I tried to follow your last sentence where you make your point but I believe there is either a typo or it the wording just doesn’t make sense.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
The most elaborate fairy tale or lie is still just a lie at the end of the day.
Page 4 of 18
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News