Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Urban Outfitters features "Vintage Kent State" sweatshirt

Posted on 9/15/14 at 8:57 am
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 8:57 am

quote:

In a strident display of bad taste, Urban Outfitters was selling a $130 "vintage" Kent State sweatshirt with fake blood splatter this weekend as an apparent homage to the 1970 shooting that left four dead. The sweatshirt is now listed as "sold out" in Urban Outfitter's online store. The shirt appears to have been a one-off sale, the site imploring customers, "We only have one, so get it or regret it!"


LINK



This post was edited on 9/15/14 at 8:59 am
Posted by BeaverPRO
Tampa
Member since Aug 2009
16250 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 8:57 am to
must be a DKE marketer
Posted by Phil0ndeeez
Houston
Member since Apr 2013
1387 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 8:57 am to
Damn lol
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51247 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:00 am to
This is still my favorite corporate PR misfire that has happened recently.

Posted by LewDawg
Member since May 2009
75242 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:04 am to
That's killer
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26173 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:05 am to
I can't even fathom their thought process in creating this.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:06 am to
That's pretty funny
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:17 am to
quote:

I can't even fathom their thought process in creating this.

Probably sitting around trying to be "edgy".
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10037 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:19 am to
Proceeds donated to the war on terror.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
77947 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:36 am to
quote:

I can't even fathom their thought process in creating this.


its urban outfitters, dude. this is nothing new

Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7855 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:24 pm to
As a debate topic, I'm curious why the 243 year old Boston Massacre was fair game for a massive clothing supplier...

but the 44 year old Kent State event is so taboo.




Is it the "age" of the event that matters the most? Or the magnitude of it? Or perhaps current politics? Something else?


Nike fully intended to keep these in production, but pulled them after the Boston Marathon Bombings. However, had those bombings NOT occurred, you could find these shirts, ostensibly mocking one of the most tragic events in American history (the 1770 event), aimed at a couple of baseball sweeps, worn and sold to this day.

quote:

Nike has pulled a sports T-shirt emblazoned with the bloodied words “Boston Massacre” in the wake of last Monday’s marathon bombings. A spokesman for Nike told ABC News the retailer has now pulled all of the “Boston Massacre” shirts from their outlet stores, as well as from large online retailers like Fanatics Inc. (ABC News)

The sweeps came to be known colloquially among fans of the Yankees-Red Sox rivalry as the first and second “Boston massacres.”
This post was edited on 9/15/14 at 9:26 pm
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141689 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

Is it the "age" of the event that matters the most?
"Satire is tragedy plus time" -- Lenny Bruce
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141689 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

the 1970 shooting that left four dead
For those who don't know, Nick Saban was a KSU student at the time:
quote:

Along with a roommate, he avoided being amidst the infamous Kent State shootings when they decided to eat lunch before walking to the rally area.
Posted by Diddles
LA
Member since Apr 2013
6981 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:34 pm to
If anything he deserves a raise. That's hilarious
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65533 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:45 pm to


Irony?
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7855 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 10:21 pm to
CAN a historical event, even a tragic one, be used for humor? Clearly, plenty of examples say yes. So that is not an arguable point.

So, given that fact, what is the "acceptable age" of a tragic historical event for grins/giggles?? I.e. how much elapsed time is required before one can joke about that? When is it "too soon?"

Is the magnitude of the tragedy important? Of course. Well at least I think so. Is the elapsed time more important? Probably... but considere these:

-- If you are an Auburn fan, the answer could be 12.5 months post-Katrina... FACT: I walked past a tailgate sign in September 2006, on-campus at Auburn, that read "Geaux Home LSU -- oh wait, you don't have a home" (I can tell you this one hit me pretty deeply, but I won't get into that today).

-- If you are the creator of Family Guy, getting a good laugh at the expense of Elizabeth Smart (the 14 year old girl raped daily for nearly a year), then just shy of four years is the answer.

-- And again, if you are Seth MacFarlane mocking the September 11, 2001 murders of 2,977 victims, then 5 years and 7 months is the answer. And again a few years after that. And yet again soonafter that.

-- If you are Jerry Seinfeld reenacting the JFK Assassination in jest, then it would seem to be 28 years.

-- If you are Nike and the event is Boston Massacre, then it seems 243 years is fine.

-- I could go on....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram