Started By
Message
locked post

What many are missing from AGC

Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:09 pm
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:09 pm
I've read many an argument for both proponents and opponents of anthropogenic climate change.

My purpose here is to clear the air (pun intended) and offer real data and logical interpretations on climate effects that we are seeing today from deep in Earth's history.

You might know some of this already. Many arguments only touch the surface of this, or state it incorrectly. That's because it's a slightly complex series of events and nuances of those events.

Just in case anyone is wondering, my background is in geology, specifically paleontology, specifically the part of paleontology that studies past environments: Paleoecology.

Let's get started.

About 40 Million years ago (40 Mya) the continents of South America and Antarctica separated at Drake's Passage, which 1) put Antartica in it's polar position that it is in to this day, and 2) allowed for ocean circulation around Antarctica.


The current that flows around Antartica is the circumantarctic current/circumpolar current. What is powerful about this and the globe is there is land seated at the South Pole and this land is surrounded by a current, where one acts to cool the other, and cool it well. This circumantarctic current feeds into the rest of the ocean currents/ocean conveyor and cools down the rest of the planet.




When the planet is cold and a landmass at the poles is extremely cold, then ice forms there. When ice forms, one important thing happens to solar radiation that would normally be trapped by greenhouse gases, it bounces back into space due to albedo of ice.

This graph shows the drop in global temperature and first formation of glaciers on Antarctica.

So, we're cooling the globe by basically installing a refrigerator that is Antarctica at the pole and the current around it.

Now that we've seen a 65 My long temperature curve, let's see everyone's favorite temperature curve, The Hockey Stick model.


First off, I need harp on one very important point: For climatologists, the term "climate" is the 30 year average of weather. So, the Hockey Stick, spanning from 1000 to 2000 only has 33.3 real data points, and really only, from 1850-2000 just 5 data points in the most debated part of the model. It is important to think about this, because much of what we all need to consider here is scale. So, let's up the scale from 2000 years to 450,000.



This shows tmeperature data for the undulating Ice Ages we've had for the last 2-3 million years. Note here that at 0 years, now, there is very little ice volume compared to just before, which was the most ice volume and coldest temperature for that particular cycle. Reading a glacial cycle from left to right on this graph you should spot one interesting detail, every time there is a drastic rise in temperature (little ice volume) it is followed by a more gradual cooling down to high glacier cover, or an Ice Age.

The most important thing to get from this is that every time there is a warming period during this state in Earth's history where Antarctica is at the South Pole with a cooling current surrounding it, warming causes the planet to shift into a cooling state.

How does this happen? Well think about it: How do you increase ice volume? Add snow. How do you add snow, increase precipitation. How do you increase precipitation? Increase evaporation. How do you increase evaporation? Increase temperature.

When the Earth warms we increase precipitation, which increases ice volume, increased ice volume then leads to increased albedo. Remember, the more ice the more reflection of radiation, and the cooler it gets.

That is the model for how warming in an inter-glacial period can drive the globe into a glacial period.

What's going to happen next? The Hockey Stick says temps are increasing. Temperatures are going to do what they have done for the last few hundred thousand years, they will drop. The current warming trend will start us on the track of cooling to another Ice Age.

In fact it will continue to do this as long as A) Antarctica stays at it's polar position, and B) there's a current that's going around Antartica and bringing this cool water all over the globe.

Seeing as plate tectonics will be the only thing that can drive this, as it created it, then this will take millions of years to change.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45905 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:20 pm to
In other words.... you haven't applied for a research grant so can freely speak your beliefs, right?
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
24280 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:21 pm to
Great read and interesting prediction. You see a global cooling coming due to increased global temperatures from climate change?
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26691 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:24 pm to
Wow, who knew they had SUVs and coal-fired power plants 340 million years ago?
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37141 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:25 pm to
Great information and write- up

Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

Great read and interesting prediction. You see a global cooling coming due to increased global temperatures from climate change?



I don't really have a prediction, more of a model-broadening perspective.
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16969 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:33 pm to
So, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

I'm hip.

Good work.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
91107 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:34 pm to
Good post and good information.

And your actual science shows that there is nothing we can do, or our Governments, to stop this cycle because it is natural. The whole Climate Change pushed by liberals is bullshite in the fact that they think any regulations would keep this from happening.

It's a good ruse though..most people are too dumb to understand this science so they buy into the propaganda.

quote:

Seeing as plate tectonics will be the only thing that can drive this, as it created it, then this will take millions of years to change.


Obviously we need to stop Hydraulic Fracking....
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

model-broadening

what place does that have in a settled science?

(i'll show myself the door)
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 9:53 pm to
I really like BBQ
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119247 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Good post and good information.

Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 10:16 pm to
on the PT, this is a political issue. Scientific discussion is actively discouraged. Beliefs are created via news bites.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262608 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 10:24 pm to
quote:


I don't really have a prediction, more of a model-broadening perspective.



Good stuff
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 11:13 pm to
That was a fantastic read.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36736 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 11:19 pm to
Good stuff, Pectus
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 12:06 am to
Fascinating.

So it looks like IF humans have any bearing on the climate, it's temporary. The Earth will have the final say, and we may or may not negligibly speed up a process that will happen anyway.

:omg:

That's perfect a perfect reason for government control of our lives!
This post was edited on 4/7/14 at 12:08 am
Posted by carbola
Bloomington, IN
Member since Aug 2010
4308 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:35 am to


Great read.

I was wondering, is it possible to use this same data to argue the other side of the coin? I'm curious to see how the same data is used to say we are changing the climate since, as you point out, they only use a 2000 year scale rather than a 450,000 year scale
Posted by Zahrim
McCamey Texas
Member since Mar 2009
7667 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:05 am to
Bookmarked the post, thanks!
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27837 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:14 am to
quote:

So it looks like IF humans have any bearing on the climate, it's temporary.


Changes in environment, even temporarily, can have a pretty huge impact on us. Heat waves, monsoons, winter storms, etc will have big impacts on people. I'm not one to defend AGC but we shouldn't scoff at the "noise" in a 2000 year period.
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 6:21 am to
I didn't read though your whole post byway of the instant noting of the using of millions of years in your OP. Given that as being a fact I now have a greater cause for laughing at the climate changers arguments about what needs to be done in the next century or else bad shite will happen.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram