Started By
Message

re: The administration's plan on Red Snapper

Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:35 am to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56204 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:35 am to
quote:

I dont see how our President really has any impact here but would point out that the original red snapper restrictions went into place in 2008 under a guy named GW Bush.


what does this have to do with, well, anything?

I didnt like him either.
Posted by wiltznucs
Apollo Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2005
8961 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:38 am to
quote:

what does this have to do with, well, anything?


The OP squarely laid blame for the snapper restrictions on Obama. Utter nonsense, but I felt it necessary to make sure the record was clear that the snapper restrictions went into place before Obama took office.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
22666 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:41 am to
How is it utter nonsense? I mentioned a continuing plan which would fall under this administration. I didn't lay blame for the initial restrictions on anyone. Make no mistake, the Obama administration is pushing policies that restrict recreational fishing.

If bush did it too, so be it.
Posted by WaterLily50
Fort Worth
Member since Jan 2012
491 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:50 am to
Why not attend the meeting this evening on regional management?

LDWF Urges Public to Attend Meeting on Regional Management
quote:

The LDWF strongly urges the public to attend this meeting and voice their opinions. This is the best opportunity for you to make suggestions or raise concerns before the Council begins developing an amendment. The Louisiana meeting is scheduled as follows:

Monday, January 14, 2013, 6 p.m.
Doubletree by Hilton 4964 Constitution Avenue Baton Rouge, LA 70808
This post was edited on 1/14/13 at 8:51 am
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56204 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 8:51 am to
quote:

. To this day, there is no reason why redfish shouldn't be able to be caught by commercials


it would be like putting Sandusky back in charge of a boys camp
Posted by Mung
NorCal
Member since Aug 2007
9054 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:33 am to
quote:

i didn't like him either


me too!

quote:

commercial refishing equated to Sandusky boys' camp


Good analogy. I doubt CCA would ever let it happen, but if you limited them to 5 per person like the recs have, I could see doing this. Maybe get some La redfish back in restaurants on a limited basis.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:37 am to
quote:

i didn't like him either




me too!

One of the greatest Presidents ever.
Posted by Mung
NorCal
Member since Aug 2007
9054 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 10:02 am to
don't send me to National Review. I don't link Mother Jones on here.

Clinton FTW. Economy was great, BJs determined not to be "sex".
Posted by JasonL79
Member since Jan 2010
6397 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 10:13 am to
quote:

quote:


commercial refishing equated to Sandusky boys' camp


Sure. I don't seem to catch any more redfish recreationally now in Venice than I did in the late 80's and 90's. Gill nets and redfish have been banned for over 16+ years. And the Venice area probably has the largest or close to the largest redfish population in the country. Venice is where my family's seafood dock was. Most of the overfishing was with bull reds caught offshore in seine nets.

I do agree it needed to be heavily regulated but not an outright ban. It should have been a limited gill net season with quoatas similar to what they do in Alaska. At the very least it should have been a rod n reel quoata.

A regulated commercial industry is no different than a regulated recreational industy. All that matters is total pounds harvested.

quote:

I doubt CCA would ever let it happen


That's because the CCA is a much larger lobbying group than anything the commercials ever had and had a lot more political pull and money also. This is exactly what I said earlier in this thread. The truth is in what happened. The CCA got their way. Louisiana politics at its finest.




Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81604 posts
Posted on 1/14/13 at 10:19 am to
quote:

don't send me to National Review. I don't link Mother Jones on here.
Typical. You don't even know what it says.

quote:

Clinton FTW. Economy was great, BJs determined not to be "sex".





He did more damage than your warped mind can begin to comprehend.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29148 posts
Posted on 1/19/13 at 8:24 am to
I hope the OB posters are chiming in with input to the Gulf Council. Point out that if the administration is so worried about the snapper and other reef fish populations, they should quit paying all that money to his campaign contributors that are removing all the habitat at a record clip. I wonder where the enviro wacko's are as the explosions while removing rigs full of fish cause massive fatalities. Guess they are too worried about the possibility that Ted Nugent might stick an arrow in one deer to worry about thousands and thousands of fish perishing at the flip of a switch.

Comment on-line here-only takes a second:

Just Say No!
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram