Started By
Message

re: Revolver recommendations for a 70 year female

Posted on 4/23/21 at 10:02 pm to
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76532 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Is modern rimfire reliable enough for self defense?


It’s reliable enough IMO. Not very powerful but better than nothing.

I’ve never once had a dud in decades of shooting .22.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
25071 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

I’ve never once had a dud in decades of shooting .22.


I’ve seen plenty and have had plenty.

Heck, on my son’s trap team, we average around 1 squib per practice/match. All factory shells.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76532 posts
Posted on 4/24/21 at 12:22 am to
Guess I’ve been lucky
Posted by beauxgy
LA
Member since Feb 2007
3471 posts
Posted on 4/24/21 at 2:50 pm to
There was a recall on Rossi 38s. You might want to Google it.


Rossi 38 recall
This post was edited on 4/24/21 at 2:54 pm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68176 posts
Posted on 4/24/21 at 4:26 pm to
You could look for an older revolver in 38 S&W.

I have one, very gentle shooter and accurate with about the same power as a .380
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28139 posts
Posted on 4/24/21 at 4:47 pm to
My brother recently bought a Heritage arms single action revolver 22LR/22wmr for his mother in law. They are lower priced guns but I was pretty impressed with it. The hammer and trigger both had very light pulls. The one he bought had a 4 1/2" barrel.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
28139 posts
Posted on 4/24/21 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

I’ve never once had a dud in decades of shooting .22.

I have had some occasionally on 22lr, but I can't ever remember having a misfire on .22mag + they pack a pretty decent punch.
This post was edited on 4/24/21 at 6:53 pm
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 4/24/21 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

I’ve never once had a dud in decades of shooting .22.

A. How much was fired thru a semi-auto pistol (rifles and revolvers are definitely more reliable at igniting the primer material).

b. You've been lucky. Or you shoot quality ammo.
Posted by Kattail
Member since Aug 2020
3342 posts
Posted on 4/24/21 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

The featherweight .38 is not a fun gun to shoot, at all. The weight of the gun (or lack of) contributes to the heavy recoil.


This is true
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76532 posts
Posted on 4/25/21 at 9:39 am to
quote:

A. How much was fired thru a semi-auto pistol (rifles and revolvers are definitely more reliable at igniting the primer material).

b. You've been lucky. Or you shoot quality ammo.


Mostly a Marlin bolt action rifle. Guess that’s the reason.
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 4/25/21 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

The featherweight .38 is not a fun gun to shoot, at all. The weight of the gun (or lack of) contributes to the heavy recoil.
quote:

This is true
This is VERY true. And they have lousy sights. And they have heavy triggers. The end result is that most people don't practice with them because it's very uncomfortable - so they never get proficient with their weapon.

A snub-nosed .38 is an expert's gun - not a beginner's gun. And it's certainly not a good choice for an arthritic 70 year old mom. That demographic will be much better served with an M&P .380 EZ.

P.S. I have had several "little old ladies" (and two middle aged men) who failed the shooting portion of the CCW class using snub-nosed .38's. Two of them missed the silhouette at a distance of six feet.
Posted by 007mag
Death Valley, Sec. 408
Member since Dec 2011
3873 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 7:11 am to
quote:

who failed the shooting portion of the CCW
Only a dickhead would deny someone their 2A right by failing them in a useless bureaucratic money grab.

ETA: I have taken the CCW so I know what I'm talking about. Hunters ED has more useful info than CCW class. In my opinion the missed round probably went through the same hole as a previous round. Who am I to judge, I cant see a bullet in flight.
This post was edited on 4/26/21 at 7:18 am
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 4/26/21 at 7:28 am to
quote:

better served with an M&P .380 EZ.


Very low recoil due to having no ammo
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram