- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:46 pm to rungunz
quote:
rungunz
are you in the industry? or just a hobbyist? you've been all over the board the past few days
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:47 pm to DeoreDX
quote:
SS barrels have a shorter lifespan than nitride or chrome lined.
What if its Nitride coated SS?
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:50 pm to DeoreDX
quote:
SS barrels have a shorter lifespan than nitride or chrome lined. I built an upper with a stainless barrel with a 12 power optic because I use it for shooting paper. If you are mag dumping and plan on throwing a lot of rounds through it I wouldn't get a SS barrel.
I can't imagine why anyone would get a SS barrel unless they were planning on using it for competition.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:51 pm to Carson123987
quote:
are you in the industry? or just a hobbyist? you've been all over the board the past few days
Just a shooter!
I've been around firearms since I came out of the womb.
I thought I'd join a local forum, and hopefully meet some like-minded guys.
I'm here to learn, and hopefully contribute what I know!
This post was edited on 7/18/16 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:54 pm to NOLAGT
quote:
SS barrels have a shorter lifespan than nitride or chrome lined.
I don't know why anyone would treat the bore of a SS barrel.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 1:58 pm to rungunz
quote:
I don't know why anyone would treat the bore of a SS barrel.
That did throw me off...first time i had seen that but im relatively new to all the ins and outs of the AR platform. First time building one.
Is it a bad idea to look for light weight barrels on a 10.5 sbr?
Posted on 7/18/16 at 2:03 pm to rungunz
quote:
Colt, the original owner of the M16 FOW TDP...
14.5" Colt M4/6921: 0.062"
10.3" Colt Mk18: 0.070"
Here is the Mk18 .pdf put out by NSW-Crane:
www.dtic.mil/ndia/2003smallarms/john.ppt
Manufacturer don't disclose their GP diameter to the public, but they can be measured with a pin gauge. It's not hard to tell when a barrel is over-gassed. Some manufacturers are ported more appropriately than others.
Great you found a manufacturer's power point. Cite the military specification. for instance, MIL-B-11595E is the material specification for small arms barrel steel.
What is the milspec gas port diameter for the 16" 5.56, 10.5 5.56, 18" .625 journal rifle length 5.56, any .300BLK, 6.5 grendel, 6.8 SPC, etc.? Thanks for the tip on the pin gauge.
quote:
Manufacturer don't disclose their GP diameter to the public
Some do
Posted on 7/18/16 at 2:12 pm to Propagandalf
quote:
Great you found a manufacturer's power point. Cite the military specification. for instance, MIL-B-11595E is the material specification for small arms barrel steel.
What is the milspec gas port diameter for the 16" 5.56, 10.5 5.56, 18" .625 journal rifle length 5.56, any .300BLK, 6.5 grendel, 6.8 SPC, etc.? Thanks for the tip on the pin gauge.
I listed the gas port diameters to two commonly fielded Colt (THE manufacturer for quite some time) weapons. You know, the company that owns the TDP, and manufactured the CQBR/Mk18 per NSWC.
From this data, one can infer what should be an efficient range for gas port sizes for barrels within 10.3" - 14.5". The lengths in this range (11.5, 12.5, 13.7) are obviously not milspec.
I don't know why you're so opposed to accepting this data.
We know most commercial gas ports are over-gassed. Just install an adjustable gas block and move on.
This post was edited on 7/18/16 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 7/18/16 at 2:29 pm to rungunz
quote:
I listed the gas port diameters to two commonly fielded Colt weapons. You know, the company that owns the TDP...
From this data, one can infer what should be an efficient range for gas port sizes for barrels within 10.3" - 14.5".
For a manufacturer producing barrels where the ammo used is known. Aftermarket barrel producers do not have the luxury of knowing exactly what ammo you'll be using and at what pressure ranges so they overgas them to function with the widest variety. As you've probably realized though your googling trying to prove me wrong the military does not make specifications for gas port diameter. Especially in barrel lengths and profiles most commonly used in the AR-15 (consumer) market. Making an 'inference' based on one manufacturer's port size for 2 barrels does not equal a spec. That's an opinion which varies from manufacturer to manufacturer based on what they think will reliably cycle the ammunition most widely used/available in the US market.
quote:
I don't know why you're so opposed to accepting this data.
Because you show up regurgitating ARFCOM BS as fact, and I'm petty, so I'm calling you on it.
To quote the great Clames:
"I'm right, you're wrong and there's nothing you can do about it."
Posted on 7/18/16 at 2:37 pm to Propagandalf
Anyone happen to have a good link with info on a step by step of how to go about filing for a SBR tax stamp for a rookie? I'd like to apply for one. Also, any idea on a turnaround timeframe now that ATF has been bombarded with forms due to the recent changes?
Posted on 7/18/16 at 2:39 pm to Mark Makers
With 41f being inplemented they said to expect times to be doubled.
Probably looking at close to a year for approvals now
Probably looking at close to a year for approvals now
Posted on 7/18/16 at 2:42 pm to Propagandalf
quote:
quote:
For a manufacturer producing barrels where the ammo used is known. Aftermarket barrel producers do not have the luxury of knowing exactly what ammo you'll be using and at what pressure ranges so they overgas them to function with the widest variety. As you've probably realized though your googling trying to prove me wrong the military does not make specifications for gas port diameter. Especially in barrel lengths and profiles most commonly used in the AR-15 (consumer) market. Making an 'inference' based on one manufacturer's port size for 2 barrels does not equal a spec. That's an opinion which varies from manufacturer to manufacturer based on what they think will reliably cycle the ammunition most widely used/available in the US market.
Because you show up regurgitating ARFCOM BS as fact, and I'm petty, so I'm calling you on it.
To quote the great Clames:
"I'm right, you're wrong and there's nothing you can do about it."
Those are some bold assumptions.
It's not "ARFCOM BS".
TDP = Colt
I'm well aware of why manufacturers over-gas. If it wasn't for everyone shooting weak .223, I could still get a BCM or KAC tuned to run 5.56.
REGARDLESS, there are gas port diameters (+/- adj gas block) that allow smoother function.
We agree that most commercial ports are over-gassed - great. Can we move on?
This post was edited on 7/18/16 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 7/18/16 at 2:56 pm to Propagandalf
quote:
Aftermarket barrel producers do not have the luxury of knowing exactly what ammo you'll be using and at what pressure ranges so they overgas them to function with the widest variety. As you've probably realized though your googling trying to prove me wrong the military does not make specifications for gas port diameter. Especially in barrel lengths and profiles most commonly used in the AR-15 (consumer) market.
Throw in the fact that a military contractor knows - for a fact - that the customer will be using 2 - and only 2 - receiver extension/buffer/spring combinations and your point is even more well made.
But, what the frick do you know, Prop - you've only built the stupid things from a myriad of mismatched parts and made them go bang, right?
quote:
Because you show up regurgitating ARFCOM BS as fact, and I'm petty, so I'm calling you on it.
I'm going to admit, this made me chuckle, IRL. And I don't know this poster, just showed up the past couple of days. Clearly some sort of Colt "queer" (NTTAWWT).
quote:
"I'm right, you're wrong and there's nothing you can do about it."
(This feels like an OT thread, suddenly. That's not a good thing.)
This post was edited on 7/18/16 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 7/18/16 at 3:02 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
feels like an OT thread, suddenly. That's not a good thing
It does have that aroma
Posted on 7/18/16 at 3:04 pm to NOLAGT
I just wanna know if I can get away with a $25 gas block or if the $55 gas block is a good investment.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 4:13 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I just wanna know if I can get away with a $25 gas block or if the $55 gas block is a good investment.
A $25 gas block is fine. My philosophy on pretty much anything is buy the absolute best you can that won't make you fret about how much you spent.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 4:37 pm to Mark Makers
I am quickly becoming overwhelmed with all the available parts.
I liked walking into the store yesterday and getting what I needed.
I need to find all my upper parts.........and since this is my first one I want to gear it up. Optics.....flash lights and all that shite
I liked walking into the store yesterday and getting what I needed.
I need to find all my upper parts.........and since this is my first one I want to gear it up. Optics.....flash lights and all that shite
Posted on 7/18/16 at 4:40 pm to CBLSU316
quote:
Optics.....flash lights and all that shite
Aimpoint and Elzetta or Surefire.
Popular
Back to top



0





