Started By
Message

re: Night club shooting in Florida...

Posted on 6/12/16 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by Dodd
Member since Oct 2003
21122 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 12:54 pm to
I'm not voting for Hillary. Neither will I simplify an extremely complicated issue.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15074 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 12:56 pm to
This woman on MSNBC has been on a 10 minute rant on how the AR is an absolute "killing machine".
This post was edited on 6/12/16 at 12:57 pm
Posted by TheDrunkenTigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
18242 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Look at her history, there has been nothing but scandal, corruption and murder that has followed her for 40 years.


She's as dirty as a politician can get. I didn't vote for Barry and I won't vote for her, but I think people forget the NRA is one of the most powerful lobbies in DC. They aren't gonna go down without a fight. Again, Obama is as anti-gun as they come and even he couldn't do much beyond restricting the import of a few "armor piercing" rounds. I just don't like to see people get taken for a ride without considering all the info.

Another thing is, they can't push this one too hard. The fact that he's the son of muslim immigrants is something we've been told over and over not to be suspicious of people for. They're making it a big part of the campaign that neither immigrants or muslims are inherently bad, and this guy just gunned down 50 people. Watch and see, a few reporters may talk about guns, but the major lib players will try and let this one fade away just like they did the couple who shot up the xmas party in cali.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48794 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

This woman on MSNBC has been on a 10 minute rant on how the AR is an absolute "killing machine


well...it is
that is what it was designed to do
the fact that 99.9% of civilian owners of an ar type forearm use it for fun, or for hunting, doesn't change the fact that its design is elegantly functional for a specific purpose...to kill efficiently and quickly

this is the hurdle that most people in this country are unable to clear. They see a military type weapon being used in the way it was designed to be used (albeit against non combatants) and they say "why?" "Why is this legal?"

it is not that difficult to understand the "other side's" point of view. I enjoy my semi auto rifles very much, and quite obviously would never use them to engage innocents. It is an issue that will come to a head one day
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28642 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 1:45 pm to
So are knives
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48794 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 2:04 pm to
so is mustard gas
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
8033 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Remember when you could drink at 18, drive at 15? The only logical step after those two, and dem snappers, is all guns gon be takin from me.


It's as if the "pro hoarders" believe that government gun grabs had actually taken place in other countries... oh wait...
This post was edited on 6/12/16 at 2:24 pm
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28642 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 2:51 pm to
Admittedly never tried hunting with mustard gas.

Have you?
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
16982 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 3:30 pm to
The news won't stop talking about the gun issue
Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5360 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

The news won't stop talking about the gun issue


Of course they won't. The liberals want to ban any firearms that not a hunting firearm in their eyes.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48794 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 4:08 pm to
nope

never hunted with a knife as my primary weapon either although I'm sure many have. The point is that the auto loading rifle was designed to do one thing and one thing only and to ignore that many many many people do not understand why they are readily available to civilians is to be willfully ignorant. I own an ak, two sks's, two ar's and a mini 30. I enjoy shooting them very much. if I wanted to however I could use them for the purpose for which they were designed with terrible consequences as we have seen today.

at some point the majority will rule here and the majority would prefer that 50 people not be able to be killed so efficiently by a lone gunman with legally acquired tools. I understand that opinion and I am sympathetic to it
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28642 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 4:14 pm to
Or we could address the issue of moral decay, the religion of Islam (responsible for the last two mass shootings), or how the hell that this guy who was on the terror watch list and investigated (I believe I heard twice) by the FBI was able to go out and buy two gun this week legally.

PC bullshite ties law enforcements hands. They probably had a good idea that this guy was about to do something but due to all the horse shite, the FBI couldn't stop it until blood was already shed.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48794 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 4:18 pm to
you know and I know the easier way to "stop this" will be to severely restrict or ban semi auto rifles. to deny that is to just not be paying attention

the push is going to be to take these rifles out of everyone's hands so that they don't fall into the wrong hands. Agree or disagree on what that will accomplish, but the fight is coming
Posted by bluemoons
the marsh
Member since Oct 2012
5868 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 7:01 pm to
America is so polarized on so many issues. Always looking for someone to blame. We could argue about what the root of this problem is until the cows come home, but the bottom line is that there are ALWAYS going to be crazy humans that do shite like this. There always have.

I understand that everyone has political ideaologies they "believe in," and that's great. I respect the hell out of people's sincerely held beliefs, regardless whether I agree with them, so long as they're at least moderately informed.

That said, my problem with the entire thing is simple. Why can't it just be a tragedy? Why does there need to be anyone to blame other than the nutcase that shot up that night club? Every time this happens, everywhere you look, someone is pushing an agenda; liberals, conservatives, republicans, democrats, special interest groups, etc. The media makes these assholes famous. All that does is divide this country further, which is exactly what those that call us enemies want. A divided nation is much easier to defeat than a unified one, and it seems that instead of respecting each others' humanity/beliefs, people are just looking for more shite to fight over.

Call it whatever you want, but I sure wish people would just get over that.
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

You're the type of person who causes availability to plummet by proclaiming the great gun and ammo grab is coming, yet it never does. Demand goes through the roof and people pay out the arse for guns that were in no danger of being banned in the first place, then six months later people are trying to sell them at a loss. Makes me question if you have a few you're trying to make your money back on.


You must have me confused with someone else. I don't plan on selling any of the guns I have. I've sold exactly one gun in my life, and that was because I needed the money for something else.

If you can point to a post where I've said "the great gun and ammo grab is coming" then please do so.

I do believe at some point the government will try this. I've seen what government has done in situations like Waco and Ruby Ridge, so pardon me if I'm not as trusting of government as you are.

LC
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

well...it is
that is what it was designed to do
the fact that 99.9% of civilian owners of an ar type forearm use it for fun, or for hunting, doesn't change the fact that its design is elegantly functional for a specific purpose...to kill efficiently and quickly


It's easy to kill a bunch of people efficiently and quickly when they are unarmed, with an AR-15, an M-16 (perhaps you should look up the difference between the two) or even a pump-action 12 gauge shotgun.

Just like politicians do, you are concentrating on the easy way out, on the simplest so-called "solution" to the problem.

It is way more complicated than this, I'm sure you know that.

LC
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
19279 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

we should not be selling automatic weapons


Pretty much all guns are automatic. Semi-automatic.

It boggles me that the lefties and media all continue to spout non-sense about lack of background checks. Every time I have bought a gun at Academy or gun show I've had one done.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48794 posts
Posted on 6/12/16 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

's easy to kill a bunch of people efficiently and quickly when they are unarmed,


of course it is
that's not the point
the point is that it is likely that a majority of Americans would prefer that they not need to go armed to a nightclub, and that one way to make that more likely is to restrict access to such an efficient weapon.

doesn't matter if you or I or any other gun owner agrees with that...it's coming nonetheless
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 6/13/16 at 2:11 am to
quote:

doesn't matter if you or I or any other gun owner agrees with that...it's coming nonetheless


Then they will have to try to ban them all. Let them try. Most people will not comply with such BS.

LC
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
12227 posts
Posted on 6/13/16 at 7:13 am to
quote:

the point is that it is likely that a majority of Americans would prefer that they not need to go armed to a nightclub


How does one lone incident mean that every individual in the country must be armed to go to a nightclub? The statistical chances of it happening are a virtual zero. However, I would prefer to not need to be armed when I'm driving through north Baton Rouge but I know I'm much better off if I am because statistics.

quote:

and that one way to make that more likely is to restrict access to such an efficient weapon.


The AR15 is the most popular rifle in the country. With millions in circulation a ban would be a virtual feel-good measure. It would take decades to actually limit them. It's also worth mentioning that rifles of all kinds account for less than 3% of murders committed with firearms each year.

If politicians really want to at least pretend they care about a "gun" problem, how come cities like Chicago, Washington DC, and New Orleans don't get around-the-clock coverage? This may be one of the first weekends ever that those cities were outnumbered in murders by the city of Orlando, Florida.

And that's what bugs me so much - politicians and the media choose to bring the "gun issue" to the forefront when it's convenient to them. They see an awful event like this one where it isn't expected (not like the ghettos where it's commonplace) and springboard off of it to be representative of everywhere.
This post was edited on 6/13/16 at 7:16 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram