- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: HR 391 (Water Access Rights) Passes 5-3 in committee
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:00 am to SpeckledTiger
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:00 am to SpeckledTiger
quote:How low?
But he could fly over your yard and you couldn't do shite about it.
1
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:07 am to cave canem
quote:
Nope the story is who the hell were the 10 pro barn sex votes?
10 people who realized we don't need a new law banning something that is already illegal.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:11 am to AlxTgr
quote:
How low?
Whatever minimum level predetermined to be legally navigable.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:20 am to HotKoolaid
So there is a canal, a canal that did not exist until someone built it...someone built it with their money to access their land in the marshes of Louisiana. Marshes that make this the most effective way to travel thru their land.
Now people have convinced lawmakers that they should have access to these canals, canals that never existed until someone else built them?
I really have not paid attention to this at all, but is that the gist?
Now people have convinced lawmakers that they should have access to these canals, canals that never existed until someone else built them?
I really have not paid attention to this at all, but is that the gist?
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:22 am to SpeckledTiger
quote:Ok, if the water is 500 feet, you can go wherever you want
Whatever minimum level predetermined to be legally navigable.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:25 am to tigerfoot
quote:
canals that never existed until someone else built them?
Canals filled with public water
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:32 am to pointdog33
Your backyard covered with public air.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:33 am to AlxTgr
fenced in land covered with public deer?
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:35 am to pointdog33
quote:
Canals filled with public water
The ownership of the water has never been called into question. Publicly owned things on private property can have restricted access. Even a pond on private property contains fish that are owned by the public, and in some cases even water that is owned by the public. Restricting access to public things is nothing new.
The issue here is not who owns what but how the property is defined. It's not like river front property where your lot is described as having a boundary of the high water mark or to the middle of a publicly owned water bottom. The Amite and Comite rivers are examples. Property lines in the marsh are drawn as if the property were land meaning you can restrict access to anything within those boundaries with the exception of already existing state owned water bottoms.
Right or wrong, no time machine exists to go back and do a more accurate survey before the property was divided up and sold. As for private canals contribution to land loss, I have no idea how that should be handled but I am a firm believer in you should not punish people for decisions made by those before him.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:36 am to HotKoolaid
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:36 am to AlxTgr
You're welcome to it at a minimum of 500 ft above it like has been determined by FAA.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 10:53 am to pointdog33
quote:
Canals filled with public water
Water must have s bottom the water doesn’t exist without the bottom. The bottom that was bought and paid for and created by a landowner.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 11:02 am to pointdog33
quote:No, I want to hover at about 6-8'.
You're welcome to it at a minimum of 500 ft above it like has been determined by FAA.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 11:06 am to AlxTgr
quote:
No, I want to hover at about 6-8'.
It's not really about what you want. That's not the law.
Contact you rep and get him to introduce the bill. That's the only way that can change.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 11:12 am to maisweh
And you were so close to coming hunt this year too baw.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 11:12 am to pointdog33
quote:
It's not really about what you want. That's not the law.
Posted on 4/11/18 at 11:15 am to AlxTgr
I thought you'd like that homage to the Alx response on waterways 
Posted on 4/11/18 at 11:17 am to joebuck
quote:
And you were so close to coming hunt this year too baw
its to prove a point to the "put up a levee and fence in your fish" crowd.
I still have no objections to going merk a doe or yearling with a crossbow
Posted on 4/11/18 at 11:24 am to dpd901
quote:
you’re a douche who thinks wealthy land owners should have exclusive access
<---------------------------
Posted on 4/11/18 at 11:33 am to maisweh
Funny how its goes all communist in this type of deal. Land owners pay taxes for their marsh land, hell everyone here pays taxes in one way shape or form
"WE PAY TAXES FOR COASTAL RESTORATION" Show me where my Louisiana State taxes go to pay for coastal restoration.
Guys I get it, I love fishing more than I love to deer hunt, but what gives me a right to come on someone else's property in order to catch fish?
I've said it before , I lived on a private canal that was dug for the subdivision, it had a gate, it has no trespassing signs and is a dead end canal. People ignored that and fished it anyway.
#inb4animalsbelongtothestate
"WE PAY TAXES FOR COASTAL RESTORATION" Show me where my Louisiana State taxes go to pay for coastal restoration.
Guys I get it, I love fishing more than I love to deer hunt, but what gives me a right to come on someone else's property in order to catch fish?
I've said it before , I lived on a private canal that was dug for the subdivision, it had a gate, it has no trespassing signs and is a dead end canal. People ignored that and fished it anyway.
#inb4animalsbelongtothestate
Page 6 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News