Started By
Message

re: F250?

Posted on 4/20/11 at 4:25 pm to
Posted by tehmidget
Prairieville, LA
Member since May 2004
1249 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

I promise I speak from experience...

I have a 2005 6.0 F-350. At 99,837 miles, I had my first problem, but it was a bad one. I thought maybe it was thermostat, since I was overheating frequently. Took it to the dealer, and found out it was the EGR Valve and Oil Cooler. $3600 large. Also found out that...although I still had less than 100,000 miles, I was 2 months past the 5 years, so warranty didn't apply.
-
I have since learned that this was a pretty common problem in the first 6.0s, and it is no longer a problem with later 6.0s...or those that have been repaired. Aside from that, I think it's a great engine. But yeah, if I could find an older one in decent shape with fairly low mileage, say 100,000>, I'd rather the 7.3. Too bad they quit making the good stuff.


Did they kick you in the nutz too? That really sucks.
Posted by YOURADHERE
Member since Dec 2006
8516 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Whats i dont understand about the 6.0"s is that they are so hit and miss. I had a friend who bought one from the same dealership on the same day and he had nothing but problems after the first month. Ford ended up buying it back


That always seemed to be the word on those. It always seems like the guys that got good ones will argue until their death that the 6.0 is a great engine. Screw that. They're definately hit or miss. The 06 6.0 that was in our family had 33,000 miles put on it in 11 months with zero issues, the 07 had the common dissappearing coolant issue likely due to stretched headstuds before 50,000 miles. A buddy of mine's father has a 04 6.0 with over 200,000 miles thats also starting to burn coolant.

I'll hang on to my 03 7.3 as a collectors item...maybe I'll run it across Barrett Jackson one day. The older (01ish) Plantinum edition F250s will always be one of the finest trucks ever made.

Posted by DieselTiger1
9 Dragon
Member since Oct 2008
13672 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 4:45 pm to
that yours?
Posted by YOURADHERE
Member since Dec 2006
8516 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 4:50 pm to
I wish. When I was looking for a diesel I missed out on one. Mine is just a plain looking F350 crew cab single wheel long bed Lariat. 2 wheel drive


Mine looks exactly like this but 2wd currently still full of dust and equipment from Mudfest.

This post was edited on 4/20/11 at 4:55 pm
Posted by Bone06
USA
Member since Feb 2008
1878 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 5:49 pm to
LINK

Read this thread about the powerstroke. It is what the mechanic was telling me about. At the end of the thread it shows a fix for the problem, the mechanic told me it would cost 2,500 for this fix but it looks like they found it cheaper. Has something to do with the EGR cooler.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20654 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 5:54 pm to
Stay away from the 6.0
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 7:10 pm to
Buddy's got a 7.3 that is a damn fine truck and has been very good to him with almost 200k on it. I'm going to say something that may sound negative regarding that truck. Compared to the new trucks, it feels like it wouldn't pull a sick whore off a piss pot. Now, if the new Super Dutys are thought as well of in 11 years, I will say that hands down, they are superior trucks. Time will tell.

I have an 09 and I LOVE it. No complaints so far, but it only has 65k in it.
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 7:13 pm to
Oh, and for the record, Diesel's truck is a damn fine truck. On par with any F250 I've seen. I did hunt with a guy from Arizona who had a white mega cab that was f'n gorgeous.
Posted by YOURADHERE
Member since Dec 2006
8516 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Buddy's got a 7.3 that is a damn fine truck and has been very good to him with almost 200k on it. I'm going to say something that may sound negative regarding that truck. Compared to the new trucks, it feels like it wouldn't pull a sick whore off a piss pot. Now, if the new Super Dutys are thought as well of in 11 years, I will say that hands down, they are superior trucks. Time will tell.

I have an 09 and I LOVE it. No complaints so far, but it only has 65k in it.



I can agree with this. By no means is the 7.3 underpowered and will haul pretty much anything within reason you can throw at it, but compared to the more modern Ford diesels it's a turd. This was evident the first time I pulled our enclosed trailer and then turned around and pulled it my dad's 6.4 F350. My 7.3 will tow it just fine, I can set the cruise at 75 and never have it kick into overdrive for hours as long as Im on flat ground. However, the truck definately knows it's there. The 6.4 on the other hand merges into traffic with the trailer as if it doesn't exist and tows as if there's nothing hooked up at all.

On a side note one of the most impressive things to me about the 6.4 is they're able to gain more hp than my 7.3 makes with just a tuner. My 7.3 with a tuner, intake and 4" turbo back is good for about 280-300hp at the rear wheels. There's a company making a 310hp tune that combined with a DPF delete and intake is good for getting the 6.4 in the 550-600hp range. How well do they hold up is the questoin.
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 8:20 pm to
I've owned a 7.3 and now own 06 6.0 psd. 7.3 is way more reliable with less maintainence and way less known issues.

Honestly I wouldn't get a 6.0 or a 6.4 knowing what I now know
Posted by El Josey Wales
Greater Geismar
Member since Nov 2007
22710 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 8:23 pm to
No love for a duramax around here? I'm on my 2nd one and have loved them both. Rides better than any Ford or Dodge.
Posted by BrewMasterFlash
Mize, MS.
Member since Dec 2008
132 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 8:32 pm to
Dmax
Posted by Buckshot
Over Here
Member since Aug 2004
253 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 9:05 pm to
After reading all this and the link from earlier I think I'll start looking for a duramax
Posted by El Josey Wales
Greater Geismar
Member since Nov 2007
22710 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 9:23 pm to
You wont be disappointed with a duramax. Mine has never had any trouble with anything i have hooked to it, gets pretty good mileage, rides good, and has had no trouble. It is an 08 with 120 k miles on it.
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12502 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Did they kick you in the nutz too? That really sucks.
FWIW, I was in Chicago 8 months last year working (and in Chicago working again right now, for that matter). I had no choice but to get it done QUICKLY. I did however call my hometown dealership to get THEIR price for the same repairs. It was about $325 cheaper, but that's the difference in Chicago IL and Purvis MS. I had to get it done...then I had to stay up here longer to pay for it!
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

with a DPF delete and intake is good for getting the 6.4 in the 550-600hp range.


I just drove one and holy shite. It is truly impressive.

As far as the Duramax, if you could get one with a Ford wrapped around it you'd have something. As long as they are dropping them in half ton trucks with IFS, they'll be sucking hind tit. Buddy has one that will run like a three legged ape, but it just doesn't have the aesthetics.
Posted by MoreOrLes
Member since Nov 2008
19472 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 10:00 pm to
Duramax is an Isuzu Diesel and I don't really know much about them.

6.0 and 7.3 I know more about so here goes.
The 7.3 was quite simply a beast of a motor. The only issues for the fords that had em was certain granny's were pro to failure prior to 100k miles The fuel injectors in the 7.3 have orifices large enough to burn the most viscous of fuel including home made biodiesel.

Our beloved government decided to change the law regarding diesel emissions effective for 2003 I believe. Subsequently Ford applied pressure to international who made the 7.3 to get the 6.0 ready. You see international had already had 6.0 in ambulances and small busses with good
results. However, those 6.0's fall were not subjected to the emissions control systems the residential 6.0 would have.

When the 03 & 04 6.0's rolled out many had major issues. Wire harnesses were rubbing the engine at points causing major issues. But the worst was the the EGR emission system. EGR stand for exhaust gas recirculating system. I don't know what brain scientist came up with it but diesels, even running on low sulfer diesel, have dirty exhaust. This exhaust is partially returned to the engine causing premature turbo failure and additional heat to the engines operation. Also the EGR coolers which use coolant through radiant exchange to cool down the oil also fail and when that happens the damage could result in blown head gaskets as well as EGR cooler and oil cooler replacement. Or even catastrophic engine death.

I'm my opinion Ford improve on the 06 and 07 6.0's but only to a point. Many of the same issues will occur just at a later mileage.

Ford experienced many lawsuits over the early 6.0 motor and they then switched to the 6.4. It too has had issues. In 2011 ford has decided to manufacture their own psd motor. Jury is still out

Btw rumor has it that ford has for along time owned cummins. I don't know if that's true or not. Internet rumors have Toyota and Nissan talking to cummins to see which one will make a half ton diesel first.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 10:04 pm to
So the consensus is that Ford built a lot of shitty engines, but people insist on buying them anyway.

I don't get it.
Posted by YOURADHERE
Member since Dec 2006
8516 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 10:16 pm to
Back a few years ago I remember Toyota releasing their concept of a 1 ton diesel dually back in 2007 or 2008 or so. From what I remember reading Toyota was about to pull the trigger to put it into production right before diesel went from about $1.50/gal to $3.00+/gal. After that the diesel market fell behind a little but so they scrapped the project.


What sucks the most about recent Ford diesels(6.4 and 6.7) is that since they're so new it'll be a few years before you can honestly determine of they're a quality engine. A majority of these are way under 100,000 miles and it'll be years before you start seeing these engines with 200,000+ on them. It's hard to live up to the hype of the 7.3. While less powerful, 300,000+ on orginal engines is pretty impressive and may be hard for modern diesels to live up to.



Posted by Labsolut
Wilmington, NC
Member since Aug 2009
358 posts
Posted on 4/20/11 at 10:17 pm to
You are correct, stricter emissions controls are what has demolished the historically bullet proof nature of almost all diesel engines, and it is getting worse. Mechanical diesel engines were one of the simplest and most reliable creations ever made. With the Tier IV controls that went into effect in January of this year, most diesels will actually have cleaner exhaust than the air being ingested at the intake. Navistar owns International, and all of the Ford versions mentioned in this thread are made by Navistar. Ford is considering a swap to Cummings, but Navistar and Caterpillar have just partnered on a line of vocational trucks (concrete, trash, lowboy tractors, etc), so there is a hope that there will actually be a CAT engineered and branded Navistar available to the pick-up market in the future, which would be sweet.
My Dad has a 2001 F250 with 240,000 miles, has replaced the tranny at about 200K, but is otherwise bullet proof.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram