- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
6.5-300 Weatherby Reloading Data
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:13 pm
Load data is sparse for the 6.5-300 Weatherby. Using Barnes and Weatherby data I have some loads worked up to shoot this weekend. Does anyone here reload and have a pet load for this? At 85-92 grains of powder per trigger pull I sure would love to have a “this is an accurate and fast enough load” starting point. Thanks.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:16 pm to captdalton
quote:
85-92 grains of powder per
Fukin hell that's a shitload
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:37 pm to captdalton
I don’t but curious as to what bullet and powder you’re using?
H1000, Retumbo?
H1000, Retumbo?
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:44 pm to captdalton
I’m curious on barrel life?!?!?!
And if you can get it have you tried 7828ssc?
And if you can get it have you tried 7828ssc?
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:34 pm to captdalton
US869 shows the most accurate powder according to Barnes.
Someone used Barnes 120gr ttsx and used 3.600 COAL, 82.3gr of Retumbo and had good results.
Someone used Barnes 120gr ttsx and used 3.600 COAL, 82.3gr of Retumbo and had good results.
Posted on 10/24/24 at 8:11 am to saintsfan1977
quote:
S869 shows the most accurate powder according to Barnes.
Someone used Barnes 120gr ttsx and used 3.600 COAL, 82.3gr of Retumbo and had good results.
Whats the fps on that bad boy?
Posted on 10/24/24 at 8:17 am to Park duck
They got 3550. That 120gr bullet would put alot of animals down moving that fast. You'd get 3350ftlb of energy. You could take down an elk with it no problem.
This post was edited on 10/24/24 at 8:25 am
Posted on 10/24/24 at 8:18 am to captdalton
I have a 6.5-300WBY but never did any reloading for it. The 130gr Scirocco II from Weatherby have been great
Posted on 10/24/24 at 9:58 am to captdalton
quote:
Back to top
Load data is sparse for the 6.5-300 Weatherby. Using Barnes and Weatherby data I have some loads worked up to shoot this weekend. Does anyone here reload and have a pet load for this? At 85-92 grains of powder per trigger pull I sure would love to have a “this is an accurate and fast enough load” starting point. Thanks.
What powder do you have? Here is a table from QuickLoad. I just grabbed a 140 grain Berger bullet to make the table. I can run a model based on the powder & bullet you choose if you'd like.

This post was edited on 10/24/24 at 10:00 am
Posted on 10/24/24 at 12:12 pm to captdalton
Holy snickies!
I would not want to hold 100 gr. of Retumbo explosion ever....
Fixed it for ya.
I would not want to hold 100 gr. of Retumbo explosion ever....
quote:
“this is an accurate and SAFE enough load” starting point.
Fixed it for ya.
Posted on 10/24/24 at 12:42 pm to captdalton
See if you can find something in Handloader magazine archives and get a backcopy of that issue. I would want to know what other people's testing used for success before I went and started burning 80gr of expensive powder every pull.
ETA: Loaddata.com has 350+ recipes for 6.5 Wby, but then again, see my comment above.
ETA: Loaddata.com has 350+ recipes for 6.5 Wby, but then again, see my comment above.
This post was edited on 10/24/24 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 12/19/24 at 1:25 pm to Duckhammer_77
I settled on 90 grains of US 869 with the LRX 127. That gives me close to 3400 fps and 1 moa. I am going to tinker with COL to see if I can squeeze a little more speed out of it while still keeping it MOA. The 91 grain load wasn’t as accurate as 90, so I just loaded up 8 more with 90 grains and called it good enough. Both animals I have shot with it went about 24” straight down and didn’t twitch. Exit holes on both, shoulder shots, were about the size of a golf ball. And for those worried about safety, 90 grains is well under max and I showed zero pressure signs with 91 grains. I have a bunch of 120 sierra pro hunter bullets for my 6.5 grendels. I am sure I could launch them at 3500+ fps. That might be fun.


Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:08 pm to captdalton
This has to be the dumbest cartridge ever. Sending a bullet faster than its parent cartridge that was already to fast lol. Better not be tinkering with loads to much. It'll be time for a new barrel by the time you get it figured out.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:54 pm to duckaholic25
quote:
Better not be tinkering with loads to much
Why? That is the fun with handloading. Seeing what you can do with a cartridge. You should see what I have done to some shotgun shells working up TSS/steel duck loads and TSS/#4 buck 4 legged loads.
quote:
It'll be time for a new barrel by the time you get it figured out.
I will buy another one if that happens.
I have it figured out enough after 10 break in/sight in rounds, 20 something test rounds, and two shots that I feel fine with it out to 500 yards. I would want to tweak it for longer shots, but I don’t need to because I have a .300 win mag sendero sighted in with 172 grain LRX’s for that.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 4:21 pm to captdalton
What is the expected barrel life on that thing?
Posted on 12/19/24 at 7:43 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I am not sure but it is a killing machine. I have enjoyed mine, when I can pry it out of my son’s hands. Lol
Posted on 12/19/24 at 7:54 pm to Arbengal
Burning 90 grains behind a 6.5 bullet it's got to be measured in dozens
I want one. Would make a perfect narrow pipeline rifle. The shot might be 30 feet or it might be 450 yards and you've got about 3 seconds to make it work.

I want one. Would make a perfect narrow pipeline rifle. The shot might be 30 feet or it might be 450 yards and you've got about 3 seconds to make it work.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 8:46 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I would expect similar to a .257 weatherby. And I haven’t burned out the throats in either of those, and one of mine has at least 300 rounds through it. I have a .22-250, another overbore type cartridge burning lots of powder to push the bullet very fast. It is putting out similar velocities as the weatherbys and I have shot a LOT of rounds through it. It is still one of my most accurate rifle.
I have read that barrel life on weatherby mags can range from 400 to 2000 shots, depending on barrel and how it is treated. I doubt I will shoot any of my magnum bolt action rifles 500 times in my lifetime. I would guess very few hunters do.
Lots of people talk about burning up barrels. Yet I can’t say I have every met someone who isn’t a long range competitive shooter who has done it. And those guys consider a barrel shot out if group size increases from .5 moa to .8 moa. I have seen some of the torture tests they do on ARs shooting 10,000 rounds of 5.56 through them at over 3,000 feet per second, and it usually isn’t the barrel that dies, it is a gas tube, gas key; or bolt that dies.
I personally think the notion of burning up barrels is wildly exaggerated in big game rifles.
I have read that barrel life on weatherby mags can range from 400 to 2000 shots, depending on barrel and how it is treated. I doubt I will shoot any of my magnum bolt action rifles 500 times in my lifetime. I would guess very few hunters do.
Lots of people talk about burning up barrels. Yet I can’t say I have every met someone who isn’t a long range competitive shooter who has done it. And those guys consider a barrel shot out if group size increases from .5 moa to .8 moa. I have seen some of the torture tests they do on ARs shooting 10,000 rounds of 5.56 through them at over 3,000 feet per second, and it usually isn’t the barrel that dies, it is a gas tube, gas key; or bolt that dies.
I personally think the notion of burning up barrels is wildly exaggerated in big game rifles.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 9:29 am to captdalton
quote:
I settled on 90 grains of US 869 with the LRX 127. That gives me close to 3400 fps and 1 moa
Are you shooting over a chronograph to give you the exact fps ? IMO, if you don't use a chrono when working up loads you're wasting your time, bullets, powder and money. ALL barrels have an "accuracy node" where a specific velocity provides the most accurate load/smallest group. To identify the AN, you need a chronograph. Velocity is worthless if the rifle is shooting unsatisfactory groups. Would you rather shoot a 1.5" (100 yd group) at 3,510 fps, or a "clover leaf" group at 3,408 fps ? I'm taking accuracy all day long. This coming from a speed freak as I have rifles/cartridges that have achieved velocities over 4,500 fps. The accuracy node for one of my custom .17 caliber rifles is around 4,120 fps.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 9:42 am to duckaholic25
quote:always love these folks who think anything that wasn’t around when PowPow was doing it is dumb.
This has to be the dumbest cartridge ever.
Roy Weatherby had a vision and it’s been proven to be effective. Speed kills. He created the round way back in the day for himself. It’s fast, flat, and deadly.
Also the barrel life argument is weak for a hunting rifle. Let’s say it’s 2000 rounds. That would last most hunters multiple life times even with lots of practice.
Popular
Back to top
