- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 30-30 vs 35 Whelen Question
Posted on 12/2/19 at 2:17 pm to Aubie Spr96
Posted on 12/2/19 at 2:17 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
The 30/30 was originally a black powder cartridge.
Actually, it wasn't. It was always a smokeless powder cartridge.
Posted on 12/2/19 at 2:19 pm to bbvdd
quote:
Like I said, if you'd actually read...
I did read. You said it's only effective to 150 yards or so... Which is ridiculous.
And, saying it's fine as long as you know it's limitations can be said for literally any rifle caliber out there.
This post was edited on 12/2/19 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 12/2/19 at 2:31 pm to Tiger 79
quote:
Not too worried about recoil
Than a single shot .35 whelen is by far the most practical choice.
Posted on 12/2/19 at 2:32 pm to ducksnbass
I believe it was the first that was designed around smokeless powder.
Posted on 12/2/19 at 2:44 pm to ducksnbass
The drop at 300 is 26 inches. At 400 it is 64 inches
Without laser rangefinders and compensating scopes this shot is impossible. With them it is irresponsible
This story proves the point of the inadequacy of the round.
Posted on 12/2/19 at 2:45 pm to ducksnbass
quote:
You said it's only effective to 150 yards or so.
I mainly say that because if sighted at 100yds a round nose 150 gr bullet at 200yds drops almost 8"
That's outside of the breadbox for pretty much all deer.
I have never researched the hornady lever revolutions. I understand that they are better but I haven't looked.
Posted on 12/2/19 at 3:10 pm to bbvdd
quote:
understand that they are better but I haven't looked.
They have a much better trajectory but in my experience piss poor terminal performance. You're better off shooting old school stuff and knowing where to hold.
Posted on 12/2/19 at 3:11 pm to Tiger 79
quote:
What brand/grain cartridge?
Like any rifle it will take some trial and error to see what groups the best, but as a first box I'd go with hornady superformance. They're 200gr, relatively easy to find and not too expensive, and have grouped well enough between three 35s I've sighted in. From there you can branch out, some swear by 180gr barnes, but my gun drives tacks with 225gr federal premium bonded bearclaws.
Posted on 12/2/19 at 3:55 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
The drop at 300 is 26 inches. At 400 it is 64 inches Without laser rangefinders and compensating scopes this shot is impossible. With them it is irresponsible
I agree with you 100 percent. But I also believe there aren’t that many people who should be shooting at deer at 400 yards with ANY rifle.
But again, why is the round inadequate? Just because you shouldn’t use it at 300 yards means you shouldn’t use it? Within the ranges it was meant to be used, 0-120 or 130 yards, which also happens to be the range most whitetail deer are shot, it kills deer perfectly. If you expect to shoot 200-300 yards you need more rifle. If you expect to shoot 400 yards you need to get closer. (My opinion)
Posted on 12/2/19 at 7:27 pm to upgrade
Did anyone say it was inadequate? Who said it shouldn't be used?
Posted on 12/2/19 at 8:43 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Did anyone say it was inadequate?
Yes actually. The poster I was replying to said it was inadequate. And you said it was irrelevant, but never stated why it was irrelevant. Most deer are shot well within the range that the 30-30 easily hits and kills them without rangefinders. That makes it still relevant.
Posted on 12/2/19 at 9:26 pm to upgrade
That post was in response to a post about a shot over 300 yards.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 8:22 am to upgrade
quote:there was conversation regarding a 300 plus yard shot going on, to which you agreed with my point
The poster I was replying to said it was inadequate.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News