- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 140 inch 6 pt. Never seen a 6pt this big.(pic included).
Posted on 1/12/11 at 9:40 am to Ole Geauxt
Posted on 1/12/11 at 9:40 am to Ole Geauxt
Not Alex. I only know him through another Alex resident from same employer.
1
Posted on 1/12/11 at 9:46 am to LSUballs
I'm curious to see them
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:24 am to Rickie
Just hung up phone with him.
Basically it goes like this.
Main Beams-28.5 and 28.25 (do I need to go further) 56.75 inches
Circ Measurements.....H1 5.5, H2 4.5, H3 3.5, H4 3.5 (pretty much equal on both sides) 35 inches in circ
G1 6 and 5---11 inches
G2-12 and 10---22 inches
Inside.18.5
I just rounded the numbers up...and came up a little above 140...
He told me the main beams swept back and forward a pretty good bit.
Basically it goes like this.
Main Beams-28.5 and 28.25 (do I need to go further) 56.75 inches
Circ Measurements.....H1 5.5, H2 4.5, H3 3.5, H4 3.5 (pretty much equal on both sides) 35 inches in circ
G1 6 and 5---11 inches
G2-12 and 10---22 inches
Inside.18.5
I just rounded the numbers up...and came up a little above 140...
He told me the main beams swept back and forward a pretty good bit.
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:28 am to tigerfoot
That there is a monster 6pt.
This post was edited on 1/12/11 at 10:59 am
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:30 am to tigerfoot
The left G1 is about 5 inches and the right is about 3
I'll buy the tine length, although I'm sure they are giving it a generous measuring point, probably measuring close to the bottom of the main beam, not where they should be measuring from
I really dont buy they mass measurements though
If you look at his right hand it looks like he could easily wrap his index finger around the base and touch his thumb
I'll buy the tine length, although I'm sure they are giving it a generous measuring point, probably measuring close to the bottom of the main beam, not where they should be measuring from
I really dont buy they mass measurements though
If you look at his right hand it looks like he could easily wrap his index finger around the base and touch his thumb
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:32 am to AlxTgr
I need to remeasure all my deer. I was doing this part wrong:
quote:
Regardless of the number of points the buck has, you get four circumference measurements on each beam.
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:39 am to Rickie
quote:Keep in mind it is hard to judge from a picture.
I really dont buy they mass measurements though
This post was edited on 1/12/11 at 10:41 am
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:43 am to Nike1
I realize this
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:44 am to Rickie
quote:
I'll buy the tine length, although I'm sure they are giving it a generous measuring point, probably measuring close to the bottom of the main beam, not where they should be measuring from
There are very few B& C scorers in La.
I shot this over to one of them, he doesnt debate it at all.
quote:
I really dont buy they mass measurements though
The mass measurements are not large, so I dont know the complaints there...the deer was 6 inches at the pedicle and 5.5 at smallest point of the bases.
Like I said, I may be off a half or two here or there...he was on the road and just went off the top of his head.
He has shot quite a few large deer, and looks at tons of them on the hoof. He measured it initially at 139....then Simmons at 140.
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:50 am to tigerfoot
I miss the good ole days when you could just say it's a big fricking 6pt.
Posted on 1/12/11 at 10:51 am to LSUballs
Too much butthurt in this thread.
Posted on 1/12/11 at 11:15 am to LSUballs
Amen
Debating whether it is 137 5/8 or 140 from a pic is weird.
Debating whether it is 137 5/8 or 140 from a pic is weird.
Posted on 1/12/11 at 11:24 am to tigerfoot
It just happened
Posted on 1/12/11 at 11:45 am to Rickie
quote:
I'm sorry but that deer does not have the mass and wouldn't get it there
Doesn't have monster main beams, woudnt get it there
Doesn't have the tine length, woudnt get it there
That thing maybe, maybe hits 130
Actually we were debating the above.
Posted on 1/12/11 at 11:48 am to LSUballs
quote:
I miss the good ole days when you could just say it's a big fricking 6pt.
Posted on 1/12/11 at 11:55 am to LSUballs
quote:
I miss the good ole days when you could just say it's a big fricking 6pt.
+ONE MILLION
Like it makes us more or less of a hunter than the other guy if our deer happens to have 1" longer horns.
"My deer got to eat more acorns this year so you suck!"
Posted on 1/12/11 at 1:12 pm to TigerDeacon
Hard to believe someone is arguing a score on a deer from a pic.
Anyway, it's a huge cull deer.
Anyway, it's a huge cull deer.
This post was edited on 1/12/11 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 1/12/11 at 1:46 pm to bbvdd
Corey lives in Monroe married to my cousin
Posted on 1/12/11 at 2:14 pm to LSUballs
quote:aight balls, what did you edit?
LSUballs
Posted on 1/12/11 at 2:22 pm to Ole Geauxt
quote:
aight balls, what did you edit?
I got involved in the argument about how big the dudes deer was. Then I realized I could give two shits about the size of another feller's deer. So I struck my comments from the record.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News