Started By
Message
locked post

Leak under seabed rumor

Posted on 6/15/10 at 10:30 pm
Posted by Impotent Waffle
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
10071 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 10:30 pm
Is there any merit to it?
Posted by Oyster
North Shore
Member since Feb 2009
10224 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 10:37 pm to
no
Posted by tigerpurple84
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2010
971 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

no


So you're saying: Yes.
Posted by Impotent Waffle
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
10071 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

no


care to elaborate?
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
24966 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:10 pm to
I don't have any inside information on this. The way I understand it is the casing is ruptured. Oil and mud was going out this rupture when the top kill was being attempted.

Some people are hysterical over this. They should be hysterical if they are right about what it means. The believe this means we will not be about to kill the well with the relief wells. They believe a geological collapse of the ground over the reservoir is likely releasing all of the oil at once.

I don't believe this will stop the bottom kill once the relief wells finish.
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10629 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:13 pm to
would have caused the leak though ? just the riser falling down ?????
Posted by Impotent Waffle
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
10071 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:25 pm to
I looked around on google found this dudes blog.

LINK

Just really started looking through it but he is supposed to have video and photos of the underground blowout.



I really hope that none of this is true.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

I really hope that none of this is true.



if there is sub-seabed damage....

we all better hope there is a merciful God,
Posted by Impotent Waffle
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
10071 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

if there is sub-seabed damage....
quote:

we all better hope there is a merciful God,


I could not agree more. Hopefully, someone will come in here with knowledge and say this is bunk but for reason I do not think it is.
Posted by Impotent Waffle
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
10071 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:39 pm to
Posted by lsu1980
Member since Feb 2007
1991 posts
Posted on 6/15/10 at 11:40 pm to
I've also heard if there is a seabed collapse there could be a 20-80 ft tsunami. Scary shite.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
24966 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 1:06 am to
Rueters said that BP was going to have 80K barrels a day capacity by the end of this month. Which is wrong. They don't understand the the two new production rigs being brought in will replace the Enterprise and the Q4000. The just added up all the numbers and report that to the world. And I bet they never put out a retraction. Then people will claim that BP lied once again. When time after time it isn't BP but the stupid news media.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49511 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 6:40 am to
quote:

I've also heard if there is a seabed collapse there could be a 20-80 ft tsunami. Scary shite.



the common thought that petroleum reservoirs are void space in the rock filled w/ liquid is not true at all

when a reservoir collapses there is NO tsunami
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49511 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 6:42 am to
the FPSO they are bringing in is made to offload this cude easily
This post was edited on 6/16/10 at 6:53 am
Posted by guedeaux
Member since Jan 2008
13734 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 9:58 am to
quote:

the common thought that petroleum reservoirs are void space in the rock filled w/ liquid is not true at all


plus isn't the actual reservoir another 5 miles underneath the sea floor? So even if it was just a huge lake of oil, it would take a frick-ton of damage (e.g. tectonic plate movements or some shite hahaha) to collapse 5 miles of sea floor
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49511 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 10:00 am to
yeah the reservoir is like 30,000' subsea
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
61069 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 11:49 am to
quote:

when a reservoir collapses there is NO tsunami
Not at all. There are platforms in the gulf with mutliple boat landings. As the land under the platform subsided, they had to put new ones on. No tsunami have resulted...
This post was edited on 6/16/10 at 11:50 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
172464 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

I've also heard if there is a seabed collapse there could be a 20-80 ft tsunami. Scary shite.
.

Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
60888 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:36 pm to
Chad, give us your expert thoughts on the tsunami and this rumor. I am sure you have something to add. You always do.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
172464 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Chad, give us your expert thoughts on the tsunami and this rumor. I am sure you have something to add. You always do.


Obama is probably meeting with BP execs to discuss what type of bomb Obama wants placed in the well underneath the surface of the ocean to create said tsunami to wipe out the south for good.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram