Started By
Message
locked post

80 mile levee in the GOM

Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:19 pm
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:19 pm
Just heard about the plans of the the Corps building this levee out in the GOM beginning in 10 days. It's going to cost them $250m and take up to 6 months. Sort of like building barrier islands like in Dubia. That would be amazing!!! Sounds like its almost a reality.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:22 pm to
Wouldn't they be trapping the oil inside of it?
Posted by Big L
Houston
Member since Sep 2005
5406 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:22 pm to
I don't understand how it's going to benefit the current disaster..do they expect that it will? The relief well should be drilled well before completion of that thing. I'm guessing it will be built in sections so multiple crews can work at one time and they will eventually meet up at intersecting points...until that point what will it do?
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:27 pm to
I am taking a guess that this is related to coastal erosion and not the current disaster?

ETA: USACE building 80 Miles for $250M, I'll take the over.
This post was edited on 5/10/10 at 5:29 pm
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:33 pm to
Supposed to act as a boom as well as hurricane protection. I don't understand it either.
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38725 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

$250M, I'll take the over.


For reals.
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
8466 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

I don't understand how it's going to benefit the current disaster..do they expect that it will?


They expect that the oil will wash up on the island levees instead blowing in to the marsh. Much easier to clean off of the sand than the marsh.

The only problem is the timing. Hopefully some can be built before too much oil gets to the marsh.
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
8466 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

I am taking a guess that this is related to coastal erosion and not the current disaster?


It is being billed as a stop gap measure for the current disaster but the coastal protection aspect will go a long way in BP saving face.

Of course this is all contingent on BP execs approving the work.

Posted by CoonassatTEXAS
Austin, TX
Member since Nov 2005
1047 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 5:57 pm to
eh?

this would be major for the future of living on the coast...

is there a link to this? where did you hear it?
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21368 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 6:02 pm to
Every little bit helps. Start building them.
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
8466 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 6:09 pm to

Heard some details about this from Karre Johnson in an interview with Plaquemines parish president Billy Nungesser on AM 690 about an hour ago. The meeting in Houma had just ended so there may not be much print media with a story yet.

This is a link from a story yesterday about the proposal before the meeting today. LINK
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 6:23 pm to
That's where I heard it.
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
116090 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

80 mile levee in the GOM


My best friend is going to be happy if this is true.
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38725 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Every little bit helps. Start building them.


I agree.
Posted by ottothewise
Member since Sep 2008
32094 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 8:06 pm to
tell that to the gov. he wanted it done in two weeks.
6 months.
Posted by Tiger Authority
Member since Jul 2007
29476 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 8:42 pm to
The litigation problems stemming from the value of the wetlands property is going to be very interesting. As I see it, the wetlands will be destroyed from this event to a large extent. Gonna be hard to calculate the value of those lands to the state of Louisiana. As such, building some sort of makeshift, 250 million dollar levee system, might be more economically efficient in the short term than having the unknown value of the wetlands destroyed that serve to protect our state. I don't know if this is the reasoning or not, just a guess, but seems like a possibility.
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
51050 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

250m


thats it?
Posted by Tiger Authority
Member since Jul 2007
29476 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 8:48 pm to
It would have to be more than 250 million I would imagine. If it was 250 this would have happened a long time ago.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
28335 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Sort of like building barrier islands like in Dubia.


I'm not sure they will do it to the extent they did in Dubai, i.e. I doubt they will start with a layer of rock and tarp over it, then fill in sand. I agree it's better than nothing, and doing it the Dubai way would cause the cost of the project to skyrocket.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 5/10/10 at 9:10 pm to
quote:



I'm not sure they will do it to the extent they did in Dubai,


No shite?? You mean they're not going to build huge islands then build multi million dollar resorts and have people actually inhibit the islands??? Damn.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram