View in: Desktop
Copyright @2023 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate Bill
Posted by ragincajun03


quote:
Middling oil producer Denbury Inc. emerged from bankruptcy in September 2020 with a collection of aging wells, pipelines to move around carbon dioxide and uncertain prospects.
Today, the Dallas-based company is one of the big winners of the Biden administration’s signature climate bill.
Denbury took on significant amounts of debt over the past decade acquiring oil properties and building out the pipelines, which ferry CO2 to depleted oil fields and coax out more crude. By 2019, debt equivalent to around 11 times its earnings was weighing on the producer’s finances, before Covid-19 lockdowns and falling oil prices pushed it into bankruptcy.
The company has since expanded into waste management, with plans to carry emitters’ CO2 through hundreds of miles of pipelines and bury it in rocky reservoirs—for a fee. Its stock is trading around $88—more than four times its price when Denbury relisted in late 2020. And analysts say that the company’s foothold in the carbon business makes it an attractive acquisition target for large oil companies.
quote:
Behind Denbury’s renaissance: billions of dollars of public money juicing carbon capture. Tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act, which President Biden signed into law last year, reward companies that store CO2 underground. Denbury won’t receive public funding directly in most cases—it will go to customers who capture the carbon—but the company will charge customers for handling their emissions.
Spurred in part by the incentives, Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and Occidental Petroleum Corp. have said they would spend billions of dollars increasing their carbon-collecting capacities this decade. Few companies, however, have as much of a head start as Denbury, analysts said.
About 900 miles of pipelines Denbury owns on the Gulf Coast snake through manufacturing hubs that emit hundreds of millions of metric tons of CO2 every year, and past future plants that will capture emissions to churn out low-carbon fuel. Crop nutrient company Nutrien Ltd., hydrogen company Clean Hydrogen Works and Mitsubishi Corp. have already signed large contracts with Denbury to gather CO2 from planned facilities.
Denbury’s pivot was made possible, in part, because starting a couple of decades ago it poured more than $1 billion into pipelines that can transport carbon, executives and analysts said. When it exited bankruptcy in late 2020, it had a clean balance sheet and 1,300 miles of pipelines in six states, allowing it to produce about 45,000 barrels of oil a day in the most recent quarter.
About a year later, the bipartisan infrastructure package funneled about $10 billion into carbon-capture projects. Then, in 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA, increased credits for industrial carbon capture and storage to $85, up from $50. Credits for capturing CO2 and using it in a process called enhanced oil recovery, in which carbon is injected into aging reservoirs to push out more oil, rose to $60 a metric ton, up from $35.
quote:
Still, the economics of trapping huge volumes of carbon underground remain unclear, and the feasibility of doing so on a large scale, remains unproven. Moreover, some environmental groups argue that carbon capture prolongs the use of fossil fuels and redirects investments away from clean energy.
quote:
Historically, Denbury had used CO2 almost entirely for enhanced oil recovery. Now, it says it wants to build something like a highway for CO2 on the Gulf Coast. It says it expects to find enough customers to ship and store between 50 million and 70 million metric tons of CO2 produced at industrial sites by 2030—roughly what it handled in 2021 in its enhanced oil recovery business—and deposit it in storage sites and oil fields, from Alabama to Houston. The company has secured seven underground storage sites with the potential to trap 2 billion metric tons of the gas, it said.
quote:
Until now, Denbury has been paying companies such as Nutrien and Air Products & Chemicals Inc. to take their CO2 for enhanced oil recovery. Now, Nutrien will pay Denbury to take and store 1.8 million metric tons of the gas a year from a planned ammonia plant in Louisiana, according to the companies.
quote:
The new business faces challenges, said analysts. For instance, obtaining permits to pump CO2 into geological reservoirs can take between 18 and 24 months, said Brian Velie, an analyst at Capital One Securities, creating uncertainty about when Denbury can start sequestering gas underground.
A Denbury spokesman said that the company was working with federal agencies to have sequestration ready by 2025.
The prospect of delayed cash flows could also damp the appetite of investors, said Gabriele Sorbara, an analyst at investment firm Siebert Williams Shank & Co.
LINK
This post was edited on 1/30 at 12:39 pm
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by Turbeauxdog
on 1/30/23 at 12:39 pm to ragincajun03

The big grift continues
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by MugMan on 1/30/23 at 12:42 pm to ragincajun03
We're getting closer and closer:


re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by el Gaucho
on 1/30/23 at 12:43 pm to ragincajun03

If we put carbon into the ground it’ll just turn into oil like the dinosaurs did and the oil companies will pump it out of the ground and make more global warming
The only way to solve global warming is to pump all of the oil out of the earth and burn it so oil companies will go out of business
The only way to solve global warming is to pump all of the oil out of the earth and burn it so oil companies will go out of business
quote:
If we put carbon into the ground it’ll just turn into oil like the dinosaurs did and the oil companies will pump it out of the ground and make more global warming

re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by EZE Tiger Fan on 1/30/23 at 12:51 pm to ragincajun03
So what member of that company has a relation with one of the top Dems in DC? I don't feel like reading all that to find out who the laundered money will go to.
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by ragincajun03
on 1/30/23 at 12:51 pm to el Gaucho

quote:
There were tons of them
Maybe, but enough to create all this oil?
The Earth itself is only 6,000 years old.
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by redstick13
on 1/30/23 at 12:52 pm to ragincajun03

I drilled some wells for Denbury once out in Mississippi. That’s all I have to add to this story.
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by GumboPot
on 1/30/23 at 12:54 pm to ragincajun03


TL/DR version.
Denbury has been doing CO2 enhanced oil recovery through out Mississippi and have developed an extensive CO2 pipeline network in Mississippi and Louisiana. They sourced this CO2 from an ancient volcano 13,000 feet under Jackson, Mississippi. These enhanced oil recovery projects appear to be winding down.
Enter the Inflation Reduction Act. Within the act the federal government will now pay CO2 emitters $85 per metric ton of CO2 sequestered. Denbury already has a lot of the CO2 pipeline infrastructure in place to get a good head start on these sequestration projects. They will get paid for the transportation of the CO2 from the emitters exhaust to the existing and new geologic formations that they are or will be tapped into.
Denbury has been doing CO2 enhanced oil recovery through out Mississippi and have developed an extensive CO2 pipeline network in Mississippi and Louisiana. They sourced this CO2 from an ancient volcano 13,000 feet under Jackson, Mississippi. These enhanced oil recovery projects appear to be winding down.
Enter the Inflation Reduction Act. Within the act the federal government will now pay CO2 emitters $85 per metric ton of CO2 sequestered. Denbury already has a lot of the CO2 pipeline infrastructure in place to get a good head start on these sequestration projects. They will get paid for the transportation of the CO2 from the emitters exhaust to the existing and new geologic formations that they are or will be tapped into.
TD Sponsor
TD Fan
USA
Member since 2001

USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor
to Everyone


Advertisement
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by ragincajun03
on 1/30/23 at 12:56 pm to EZE Tiger Fan

re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by ragincajun03
on 1/30/23 at 1:00 pm to redstick13

quote:
drilled some wells for Denbury once out in Mississippi. That’s all I have to add to this story.
That's the kind of contributions I was hoping for.

Denbury has that huge CO2 line that basically stretches the width of Louisiana, with current and future plants tying in, so figured it was relevant to the board.
This post was edited on 1/30 at 1:02 pm
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by GumboPot
on 1/30/23 at 1:02 pm to ragincajun03


quote:
Still, the economics of trapping huge volumes of carbon underground remain unclear, and the feasibility of doing so on a large scale, remains unproven.
As long as the federal government provides enough money to make these projects viable the projects will move forward. The risks is a new administration or congress. The tax credits can be taken away (and kill these projects) just as fast as they were initially passed.
From an environmental perspective it seems more like a oxygen mining project. The molecular weigh of CO2 is 44. 32 is Oxygen and 12 is carbon. That means 73% of the mass of CO2 is mined from the air in the form of breathable oxygen and put into the ground and thusly removing CO2 from the atmosphere.
This is all based on the assumption that man is creating the increase in CO2 concentration. This might be true but it also may be true that the seas are warming due to solar activity thus releasing more CO2 from the oceans. If this is the case these projects will make no difference. It's just virtue signaling.
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by GumboPot
on 1/30/23 at 1:03 pm to ragincajun03


quote:
I guess you can look and see who Denbury Resources donated to?
A lot of Mississippi politicians.

re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by el Gaucho
on 1/30/23 at 1:04 pm to ragincajun03

It just goes to show you that God always has a plan for us. First he gave us dinosaurs to ride on and then he turned them into oil to power our f250s
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by TheFlyingTiger
on 1/30/23 at 1:05 pm to ragincajun03

Literally pumping air around for billions.
Spin up the choppers
Spin up the choppers
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by ragincajun03
on 1/30/23 at 1:11 pm to GumboPot

You obviously understand the chemistry side of this stuff. I've got a grasp on some of the actual physical infrastructure of these operations, but not nearly smart enough to understand the chemistry.
I can see where the point-source sequestration (via pipeline directly from an emitter before it is ever released into the air) could be of benefit to the planet in the form of helping our petrochemical facilities put out less emissions.
However, it's the direct air capture stuff that has me puzzled and wondering if we aren't trading one perceived problem for another. Those dac facilities take a shit-ton of electricity and water to run, from what I understand. And what appears to be a bigger immediate issue now than increased CO2? Availability of energy (electricity) and availability of water.
Maybe on the water side, those things can run off of recycled oilfield and wastewater? Again, though water recycle facilities require a decent amount of generated power.

I can see where the point-source sequestration (via pipeline directly from an emitter before it is ever released into the air) could be of benefit to the planet in the form of helping our petrochemical facilities put out less emissions.
However, it's the direct air capture stuff that has me puzzled and wondering if we aren't trading one perceived problem for another. Those dac facilities take a shit-ton of electricity and water to run, from what I understand. And what appears to be a bigger immediate issue now than increased CO2? Availability of energy (electricity) and availability of water.
Maybe on the water side, those things can run off of recycled oilfield and wastewater? Again, though water recycle facilities require a decent amount of generated power.
This post was edited on 1/30 at 1:13 pm
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by Taxing Authority
on 1/30/23 at 1:39 pm to ragincajun03


re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by TheFlyingTiger
on 1/30/23 at 1:41 pm to ragincajun03

quote:
Those dac facilities take a shit-ton of electricity and water to run, from what I understand. And what appears to be a bigger immediate issue now than increased CO2? Availability of energy (electricity) and availability of water
Making energy more scarce than it already is... is the point. They say it out loud at all their conferences. Hell they're planning on paying the 3rd world Not to develop.
Watermelon environmental policies. Green exterior, all Red on the inside.
This post was edited on 1/30 at 1:48 pm
re: WSJ: Small Oil Producer Stands to Win Big From Climate BillPosted by dakarx
on 1/30/23 at 1:55 pm to TheFlyingTiger

Just show us a list of the top 20 stock holders, that will reveal the real motivation.
Popular
Back to top
