Started By
Message

Wreck of SMS Scharnhorst found

Posted on 12/5/19 at 4:54 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98195 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 4:54 pm
quote:

The Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust is pleased to announce that the wreck of SMS Scharnhorst has been located off the Falkland Islands. The Scharnhorst, an armoured battle-cruiser and the flagship of Admiral Maximilian Graf von Spee’s East Asia Squadron, was sunk on 8 December 1914 during the Battle of the Falkland Islands, a crucial naval battle in the early days of the First World War.

This discovery is a major breakthrough in the quest to locate all of the ships that comprised the German squadron lost during the battle. The search began on the centenary of the Battle in December 2014 but was initially unsuccessful. Five years later, the mission was resumed using state of the art subsea search equipment. Working from the subsea search vessel, Seabed Constructor, the search operation involved the deployment of four Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs), exploring a search box of approximately 4,500km2 of the seabed. Working methodically through the designated search area, and using equipment including side-scan sonar and a multi-beam echo-sounder, Scharnhorst was discovered on the third day of the search 98 nautical miles south-east of Port Stanley at a depth of 1610 meters.


quote:

The Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust is pleased to announce that the wreck of SMS Scharnhorst has been located off the Falkland Islands. The Scharnhorst, an armoured battle-cruiser and the flagship of Admiral Maximilian Graf von Spee’s East Asia Squadron, was sunk on 8 December 1914 during the Battle of the Falkland Islands, a crucial naval battle in the early days of the First World War.

This discovery is a major breakthrough in the quest to locate all of the ships that comprised the German squadron lost during the battle. The search began on the centenary of the Battle in December 2014 but was initially unsuccessful. Five years later, the mission was resumed using state of the art subsea search equipment. Working from the subsea search vessel, Seabed Constructor, the search operation involved the deployment of four Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs), exploring a search box of approximately 4,500km2 of the seabed. Working methodically through the designated search area, and using equipment including side-scan sonar and a multi-beam echo-sounder, Scharnhorst was discovered on the third day of the search 98 nautical miles south-east of Port Stanley at a depth of 1610 meters.








LINK
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37655 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 4:57 pm to
1610 meters .... so almost exactly 1 land mile deep.

Doesn't seem like much up here but imagine the PSI at that depth.
Posted by ElectricWizard0
Member since Jul 2017
2702 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 4:57 pm to
Germans
Posted by Fat and Happy
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
17022 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:01 pm to
Something about sunken ships, i have always found really interesting
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
65497 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Wreck of SMS

he does it to himself in every mike leach thread. dude is a clown
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142047 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Wreck of SMS Scharnhorst
This was Gordon lightfoot's first choice, but it just didn't have the ring of Edmund Fitzgerald
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
7748 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:11 pm to
Great pics from that depth.
Posted by crazyLSUstudent
391 miles away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2012
5520 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:20 pm to
Crazy that it landed perfectly straight up
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65121 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

1610 meters .... so almost exactly 1 land mile deep.

Doesn't seem like much up here but imagine the PSI at that depth.




Dive six.

Here we are again on the deck of Titanic. Two and a half miles down. 3,821 meters. Pressure outside is three and a half tons per square inch.

These windows are nine inches thick and if they go, it's sayonara in two microseconds.

All right. 'Nuff of that bullshite.
Posted by LSU Fan SLU Grad
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2006
4893 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Doesn't seem like much up here but imagine the PSI at that depth.


2362 psi
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
19532 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:41 pm to
I wonder what was worse for the crew of that boat: the knowledge that they were going to the bottom with the boat, or serving on a boat named “Scharnhorst”.



What, too soon?
This post was edited on 12/6/19 at 7:49 am
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49441 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Wreck of SMS

he does it to himself in every mike leach thread. dude is a clown


Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45783 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Doesn't seem like much up here but imagine the PSI at that depth.
2361.9 PSI at that depth.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38536 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

2361.9 PSI at that depth.



While in deep oil and gas wells high tech MWD/LWD tools can run in up to 30,000 psi.
Posted by LSU in Frisco TX
In the Green
Member since Oct 2006
752 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 6:14 pm to
Amazing. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34114 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 7:15 pm to
It's a tomb, leave it be
Posted by Soup Sammich
Member since Aug 2015
3301 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

It's a tomb


No it’s a ship.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98195 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 7:25 pm to
Interesting that it's roughly contemperaneous with the Titanic wreck, but looks to be in much better shape.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
8664 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 7:25 pm to
Sort of on topic:

If the sea levels change due to a catastrophic glaciation that drops sea level 200', does the pressure at that depth change even though there's 200' less of water above it?
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38536 posts
Posted on 12/5/19 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

If the sea levels change due to a catastrophic glaciation that drops sea level 200', does the pressure at that depth change even though there's 200' less of water above it?



Yes.

Water Depth x Water Density x 0.052 = psi
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram