- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman Attacks Man Driving Porsche Because She Hates Fancy White People
Posted on 4/6/17 at 9:51 am to StrongSafety
Posted on 4/6/17 at 9:51 am to StrongSafety
quote:
I'll give you socioeconomic factors that REAL people deal with every day
Maybe your definition of "REAL" people shouldn't include those that have multiple kids out of wedlock to multiple different absentee fathers and live off the government.
Yeah, sure it's harder to get ahead born in that situation. But maybe as a society if we stop accepting this as some kind of norm and rewarding it with more free government services, then their number would dwindle and what you consider "REAL" people would have a better shot.
Growing up in a stable home with parents (or parent) who work for a living (as opposed to voting for a living) should be the norm of "REAL" people, not a "privilege".
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 9:52 am
1
Posted on 4/6/17 at 9:51 am to Wolfhound45
He got called every racial epithet but the n word PUBLIClY for 8+ years and he's thin skinned? He never reacted once to the pathetic betaness of some of his insecure distractors and opponents.
Trump is still trying to settle a score with a man he never even lost to.
Trump is still trying to settle a score with a man he never even lost to.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 9:53 am to StrongSafety
Obama was pretty thin skinned, brah.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 9:58 am to StrongSafety
quote:Baw, no, just no. That is revisionist garbage from a thin skinned man and his supporters. You are imagining things. He expected everyone to bow before his greatness and was outraged when they did not. Damn dude, he had a super majority in his first two years and he barely got his signature legislation passed. He is not a consensus builder. He is not a leader. And if it makes you feel any better, neither is Trump.
He got called every racial epithet but the n word PUBLIClY for 8+ years and he's thin skinned? He never reacted once to the pathetic betaness of some of his insecure distractors and opponents.
Take a nap. You will feel better.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 9:59 am to Loungefly85
quote:
Maybe your definition of "REAL" people shouldn't include those that have multiple kids out of wedlock to multiple different absentee fathers and live off the government.
very unamerican statement by you. Why would one American be less than another
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:01 am to StrongSafety
quote:
very unamerican statement by you. Why would one American be less than another
There are contributors and there are takers. Yes, one is of greater value than the other.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:03 am to StrongSafety
quote:
very unamerican statement by you. Why would one American be less than another
You're the one who emphasized REAL in all caps. Why are you insinuating that one American is more REAL than another?
Very unamerican.
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 10:04 am
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:04 am to Wolfhound45
C'mon, u guys are putting me on. SS is clearly a really bad troll.
No one could be this stupid on an hourly basis on here
No one could be this stupid on an hourly basis on here
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:08 am to RogerTheShrubber
There are takers and contributors amongst all socioeconomic groups --- many social scientists would argue that our greatest takers/exploiters are actually those with the most opportunity/most resources
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:09 am to StrongSafety
quote:
the whole "pull your self up by your bootstraps" mantra is trash
This mantra is ruining our country.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:10 am to StrongSafety
If he shot her, would the state laws of Virginia and the prosecutor been favorable towards him?
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:10 am to Loungefly85
The problem is that I wasn't insinuating that some are more American than others.
Based off our framers definitions, to be considered a real American all you have to do is be born here or be a citizen and then you're protected by the bill of rights and the 20+ amendments.
I should correct myself and say the other posters comments were very unpatriotic.
Based off our framers definitions, to be considered a real American all you have to do is be born here or be a citizen and then you're protected by the bill of rights and the 20+ amendments.
I should correct myself and say the other posters comments were very unpatriotic.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:11 am to StrongSafety
quote:
Does this person have kids?
Again, personal responsibility.
quote:
You give me a "blueprint" and I'll give you socioeconomic factors that REAL people deal with every day that make your so "simple
And easy path" harder than it seems
No one said it was easy. Its hard. That's why people don't do it.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:14 am to StrongSafety
quote:
There are takers and contributors amongst all socioeconomic groups --- many social scientists would argue that our greatest takers/exploiters are actually those with the most opportunity/most resources
They would be wrong.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:15 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
If she said that during the attack, then I sure hope she is charged with a hate crime. Unfortunately she probably won't be and a plea deal will be worked out. She will get some kind of probation
If the ethnicity of the two individuals were reversed the Caucasian attacker would do time for a felony offense almost certainly.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:17 am to SeeeeK
quote:
C'mon, u guys are putting me on. SS is clearly a really bad troll.
No one could be this stupid on an hourly basis on here.
Yes, completely full of shite, but with a bright shiny hook ... or the most delusional kool-aid guzzling moron I've come across.
... For his sake, I hope it's the former; otherwise, he needs help tying his shoelaces every morning. 
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:22 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
There are takers and contributors amongst all socioeconomic groups --- many social scientists would argue that our greatest takers/exploiters are actually those with the most opportunity/most resources
They would be wrong.
What he is saying is the rich have the power and resources to further exploit.
An example would be a rich real estate developer pressuring public officials to condemn a building filled with poors so that he can easily demo and rebuild for his own gain. One rich man is able to impact the lives of a thousand individuals. One poor man does not have the same ability.
One side will see the argument as the rich man's actions were good for society whereas the other side of the coin would see it as abusive of the poor.
JP Morgan is arguably the "greatest taker" in american history
I'm not saying I agree with the Social Scientists, but their idea has some merit.
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 10:24 am
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:29 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
What he is saying is the rich have the power and resources to further exploit.
Yes, I've taken enough Marxist laden sociology to understand what he meant and disagree, because it's based purely on ideological interpretation and cherry picks
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
There's a group that literally takes our tax money to live off of and there's a group that literally pays taxes to support others.
These are objective facts.
Whether redeveloping or gentrifying poor areas is good or bad for low socio-economic groups is purely subjective and a completely split argument.
Is bulldozing your neighbors house and building a million dollar home, thus doubling your property value, a bad thing for you? Some people say it is, which I think is absurd, but I do agree is subjective.
These are objective facts.
Whether redeveloping or gentrifying poor areas is good or bad for low socio-economic groups is purely subjective and a completely split argument.
Is bulldozing your neighbors house and building a million dollar home, thus doubling your property value, a bad thing for you? Some people say it is, which I think is absurd, but I do agree is subjective.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 10:39 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Is bulldozing your neighbors house and building a million dollar home, thus doubling your property value, a bad thing for you? Some people say it is, which I think is absurd, but I do agree is subjective.
It's bad for you if it wasn't the neighbor's choice to bulldoze and you're the next one in the crosshairs.
Again, I'm not defending/promoting this line of thinking.
I generally try to see things from all perspectives as it helps me not to hate/judge harshly those with opposing viewpoints.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News